Originally Posted by Pretty Polly:
“The lad is clearly being edited to look useless, and for that reason, I wouldn't be surprised if he turns out to do quite well.
If the losing PM is automatically in the board room on the basis the loss must be at least partly their fault, then the winning PM (which he was) must be deemed to have at least some of the credit.”
I do see this logic and I'd say that in most cases, the PM has a big impact on whether the task succeeds or fails. But it's not infallible. There have probably been the odd occasions when the PM in the losing task was not one of the three people most responsible for losing the task.
Equally, there are times when the winning team wins because of the efforts of other team members, apart from the PM. The whole team want to win - otherwise they're vulnerable. It's totally in their interests to win, even if their PM is crap. And the way Siralun saw it, that's the way it was with Noorul. There were strong team members who pushed it through.
I agree that they're all victims of their editing, but it's very difficult to make a dynamic, innovative team leader look useless. Noorul did plenty to help the editors. He didn't sell anything. He couldn't seem to make any decisions. He hasn't made a single postive impression in five weeks. I'd say Noorul looks useless because he is.
Most importantly, Nick and Margaret, who see the task as it is rather than the edited version, have a very low opinion of him.