• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Is Chiles two faced?
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
peely
24-05-2009
Originally Posted by paglialite:
“How are these things in any way connected?

If you separate from your partner does it mean your fellw FMs and the GBP public can't 'trust' you anymore?

Why the assumption that there's something necessarily morally wrong with divorce?”

I think its immoral to leave your children, particularly if you do so in order to pursue your own selfish dreams and desires. Marriages can always be worked on if people feel a moral responsibility to stay.

However, that doesn't automatically make him dishonest or immoral in other ways, so I don't know why its important to raise the issue, by anyone other than his family.
rob1973
24-05-2009
Originally Posted by The Net:
“I read somewhere that Adrian Chiles is the Frank Bough of the 21st Century. Cheery Sports presenter who converts easily to non sport. The One Show is a modern day Nationwide if anybody remembers that programme in the 70s and 80s.

He is excellent.”

Does this mean he's going to get caught with a huge bag of coke and some chaps wife at a swingers party?

Originally Posted by Minky_Bum:
“Chiles is only there to present. he probably has a producer screaming in his ear piece "be nice". Nonetheless, the man still looks like a croissant.”


Originally Posted by smudges dad:
“But also true...? Maybe it indicates the level of trust we can put in him?

I'll agree it's below the belt, but maybe reminding people that he's not a saint is also important.”

Trust him? He's a TV presenter not your bank manager!
paglialite
01-06-2009
Originally Posted by peely:
“I think its immoral to leave your children, particularly if you do so in order to pursue your own selfish dreams and desires. Marriages can always be worked on if people feel a moral responsibility to stay.”

You have no idea what's gone on between them and who, if either, is at fault.

I hope you never do jury service.
Deerd
01-06-2009
Originally Posted by peely:
“I think its immoral to leave your children, particularly if you do so in order to pursue your own selfish dreams and desires. Marriages can always be worked on if people feel a moral responsibility to stay.

However, that doesn't automatically make him dishonest or immoral in other ways, so I don't know why its important to raise the issue, by anyone other than his family.”

I find it more morally questionable to advocate staying together for the sake of the children (who are the first to sense when all is not well). Children invariably suffer in that scenario.
Tercet2
01-06-2009
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“You're Fired is basically candidate rehab. It's half an hour for the candidates to try to persuade the viewing audience not to throw crap at them in the street. The show will do everything it can to help them with this, because there's every chance they can be used for media appearances and to "consolidate the brand" in future (Weakest Link, pundit appearances on other shows etc). Pretty much the only exception to this was the Katie Hopkins episode, and she clearly WANTED to carry on being marketed as a villain.

Adrian Chiles' job is to make the contestant currently sat on the panel look as good and affable as possible. Often this will involve slagging off another candidate still on the show, to make the current fired person look as good as possible by comparison. Then THAT person is fired, and the process continues.

I think people need to bear in mind that it's not the case that the main show has an edit and You're Fired doesn't. It does. A very stringent edit. Just a different one. You get barely more of a picture of the "real person" on You're Fired than you do on the actual show.”

Exactly right. And hopefully get this thread back on topic
fanchon
01-06-2009
Originally Posted by k-bola:
“Yes. Given that a couple of weeks ago Chiles said that he couldnt wait to get that 'tosser' Ben on his show and when it happened he was bending over backwards to be nice to him. Two face Chiles - you're fired.”



What an ar*e. My opinion of him since the Carol Thatcher affair has lowered.
Tern
02-06-2009
Originally Posted by fanchon:
“What an ar*e. My opinion of him since the Carol Thatcher affair has lowered.”

I hadn't heard about that so just did a Google.

Well done Adrian!

Top man.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map