• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Music
PI Michelles first single - unsurprisingly rubbish
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
DryHumper
21-12-2003
Heard Pop Idol Michelle's first single on the radio 1 chart show today, unsurprisingly a bland, forgettable ballad. No doubt its still a cert for no.1 though.

I wonder which song she'll cover for her second release? (I'd love it if someone asked her that on a phone-in )
JJenius
21-12-2003
Shell probably say:
Ive made it, to all those who have said i wouldnt look at me now. bla bla

Sob sob

In the words of Tim Lovejoy " Itll never last "
Goodfella
21-12-2003
It is a poor song and she was struggling with the low notes last night. Havent heard the CD version.
Ron Jeremy
22-12-2003
she's the new rik waller
Sazz
22-12-2003
She'll be singing on cruise ships within a year.

(Waits for best make sure she's in the middle otheriwse the ship will sink etc. jokes.)
loddellbosh
22-12-2003
Quote:
“(Waits for best make sure she's in the middle otheriwse the ship will sink etc. jokes.)”

Best make sure she's in the middle otherwise the ship will sink.

There you go. Wait over.






BTW. I do like Michelle, and voted for her.
Sazz
22-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by aanddfan
Best make sure she's in the middle otherwise the ship will sink.

There you go. Wait over.
”



I pruposely didn't vote for Sam the week he went, 'I'll save all my votes for the final that way i can spend more money on the final.' More fool me.

So i just wasted all the money on Mark instead.
Ron Jeremy
22-12-2003
the reason the fat beast won is that all the fat and ugly women in the country voted for her, don't worry she won't survive her first single and will go on to be a sumo wrestler
*Jon B - Somerset*
23-12-2003
The onoly person who should of won that competition IMO was the man who wore the glasses, "The Vicar" or something like that, I didn't actually watch the show.

Michelle isn't doing us any favours, all she will do is make the fat teenagers more confident to keep on eating.
TOML
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Ron Jeremy
the reason the fat beast won is that all the fat and ugly women in the country voted for her, don't worry she won't survive her first single and will go on to be a sumo wrestler ”


That's not very nice, i'll admit i do take the piss out of gareth but give her a chance. At least sam didn't win
Sazz
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by TOML
That's not very nice, i'll admit i do take the piss out of gareth but give her a chance. At least sam didn't win ”

Why should we give her a chance when you openly admit to riduculing Gareth? The difference is Gareth's problem he had no control over, Michelle's is probably due to her own overeating.
SwordFish
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Sazz
Why should we give her a chance when you openly admit to riduculing Gareth? The difference is Gareth's problem he had no control over, Michelle's is probably due to her own overeating. ”

Nope. Its a problem as far as Michelle is concerned. It is a problem for people who cant see further than pyhsical appearance. I suggest they deal with it. Michelle is quite happy the way she is.
Sazz
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by SwordFish
Nope. Its not Michelles problem. It is a problem for people who cant see further than pyhsical appearance. I suggest they deal with it. Michelle is quite happy the way she is. ”

Why has she tried and suceeded to lose weight on a diet then?
*Jon B - Somerset*
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by SwordFish
Nope. Its a problem as far as Michelle is concerned. It is a problem for people who cant see further than pyhsical appearance. I suggest they deal with it. Michelle is quite happy the way she is. ”

Perhaps I am one of those low lives, but I really dont find her "attractive" More of a turn off really, I mean lets be honest would you really pay to see her naked or given the chance would you want to see Susanne naked?!
iain
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Ron Jeremy
she's the new rik waller ”

yeah - right.

the trouble with rik was at the start everyone thought *give him a chance* - but then he turned out to be a complete tosser. oh well.

very unfair to compare Michelle to Rik, just because of their size.

Iain
iain
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Ron Jeremy
the reason the fat beast won is that all the fat and ugly women in the country voted for her, don't worry she won't survive her first single and will go on to be a sumo wrestler ”

you're quite offensive really aren't you?

Iain
iain
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by *Jon B - Somerset*
Perhaps I am one of those low lives, but I really dont find her "attractive" More of a turn off really, I mean lets be honest would you really pay to see her naked or given the chance would you want to see Susanne naked?! ”

thats hardly relevant tho', is it?

besides, do you have to pay to see naked women?

Iain
PhattMatt
23-12-2003
Obesity is just as unhealthy an image to portray as the anorexic models we see about. The "healthy" image of a female would be someone about the size that Kate Winslet was in Titanic, or Geri Halliwell pre weight loss.

Just as anorexia can cause numerous health problems, obesity is probably more dangerous, heart conditions, arterial disease, increased risk of cancer, and overall a decreased chance of being alive. I don't think all girls should be little sticks either, but they shouldn't be encouraged to think that obesity is a good thing.

The whole "appearance" arguement won't wash either because its not about how ugly or attractive she is, its about the fact that shes unhealthily overweight.
*Jon B - Somerset*
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by iain
thats hardly relevant tho', is it?

besides, do you have to pay to see naked women?

Iain
”

Iain is on the ball today!
Na not really that relevent but I still put in my €2 worth
June
23-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Ron Jeremy
the reason the fat beast won is that all the fat and ugly women in the country voted for her, don't worry she won't survive her first single and will go on to be a sumo wrestler ”

Well this fat(ish) and ordinary-looking woman didn't vote for her - or anybody else for that matter!

But she does have nice skin! And her singing voice really grates!
Jon Bon Jovi
23-12-2003
You guys are pathetic! Who cares what she looks like, I wasn't aware you could see images when listening to the radio. She's a nice lass, gotta a great voice and the singles pretty good so lay off and give her a chance I can't belive how openly offensive your being. All this shows why michelle is needed to show people that raw talent is more important than image.
*Jon B - Somerset*
23-12-2003
Yeah but she is Killing herself at the same time?!
Ron Jeremy
24-12-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by iain
you're quite offensive really aren't you?

Iain
”

not really, i complemented her on to become a sumo wrestler, not many people can achieve that
iain
24-12-2003
isn't there more to sumo wrestling than being that large tho'?

Iain
DryHumper
05-01-2004
Well, I guess I'm being a bit shallow bringing this up, but history seems to be repeating itself with Michelle. I heard a few days ago, that she is infact, supposed to be 15 stone, but looking at her on GMTV, she's either exceedingly short, has internal anatomy like an aero bar, or they are telling a few porkies about her weight. Because she looks over 20 stone to me.

I remember the same thing happened with "20 stone" Rick Waller. I thought to myself "No way that guy is only 20 stone, he's huge! He must be more like 30 stone" at the time. And when he ended up getting weighed on tv, he turned out to be just over.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map