• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
That was totally unfair on the other 7 acts tonight!
CaroUK
29-05-2009
They should NOT have let her sing again.

If she couldn't cope with it tonight, how on earth will she deal with the increased pressure tomorrow?

And it wasn't fair on the acts which came after her either. They had to wait longer than they would have, knowing that she was going to get a massive sympathy vote as a result.

They may as well not have bothered coming on!
quelquechose
29-05-2009
I fully agree. She should not have had "another go".
Bella Trix
29-05-2009
I feel sorry for Greg. :'( He looked a bit gutted. I wonder if he would have got through if Hollie had sung through the first time round.
Glorfindel
29-05-2009
Originally Posted by Bella Trix:
“I feel sorry for Greg. :'(”

Oddly, I was just saying to my boyfriend that the little Good Evans girls should have gone for the sympathy vote and bawled on stage when Hollie had her little breakdown...

It IS unfair, as I don't think anyone else would have been granted the opportunity to sing again.
Eye Sea
29-05-2009
I was slightly unfair, I admit.
Anightlikethis
29-05-2009
why? they were rubbish - minus Aiden
evesapples131
29-05-2009
How was it unfair? they all got to finish their acts didnt they? Nothing was taken away from them? You don't make any sense!
aj_2000
29-05-2009
DCD should of gone through! Had alot of variety! The final could of done with a female dance act!
Bonny1
29-05-2009
horrid situation all round, left me with a bad taste in my mouth...
littlemissbb
29-05-2009
So, what happens next time someone else cocks it up and asks for another go?
Glorfindel
29-05-2009
Originally Posted by evesapples131:
“How was it unfair? they all got to finish their acts didnt they? Nothing was taken away from them? You don't make any sense!”

I think the point is that from the moment Hollie started to 'cry', she'd sealed her spot in the final...and she got the opportunity to sing again, which most acts likely woudnt' have done.
CaroUK
29-05-2009
Originally Posted by evesapples131:
“How was it unfair? they all got to finish their acts didnt they? Nothing was taken away from them? You don't make any sense!”

It was unfair as they are ALL nervous.

But the last acts had to perform knowing that they were on a hiding to nothing after Hollie was allowed her second chance.

That "performance" guaranteed her a place in the finals which may otherwise not have got
jake19801957
29-05-2009
Originally Posted by CaroUK:
“They should NOT have let her sing again.

If she couldn't cope with it tonight, how on earth will she deal with the increased pressure tomorrow?

And it wasn't fair on the acts which came after her either. They had to wait longer than they would have, knowing that she was going to get a massive sympathy vote as a result.

They may as well not have bothered coming on!”

agree
aj_2000
29-05-2009
It's not a really good advert for BGT around the globe! They must be laughing at us atm!
Angurdaval
29-05-2009
apparently Gregs cloack came off or something and he had to hold it back on
he should have cried and asked to start again
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map