...she was not good enough to go through on the grounds of talent or her performance tonight; so, to put her through for other reasons, her "bravery" is not good for a talent show.

I agree. I dont think her singing was that great tbh. It was shaky and some of it sounded out of tune

Completely agree. She had her chance. She blew it.

If only she could be as good as national favourites like Stavros Flatley...*sighs wistfully*

Cause Stone Cold said so?

I thought for sure the judges would put Greg Pritchard through (2 -1) and avoid any further hysterionics tom'w night. Also just because his act is so unique.

But then Amanda had to stick the boot in and say her performance was actually better. Greg didn't deserve that.

Bottom line is tonight was sh!te.

Aiden was the only one who acquitted himself with any competence. Even so, he wasn't 'world class' (but with great potential)

The public voted her in the top three.

Compared to Greg, even her first performance was better.

What could the judges do?

Bottom line - bad night all round.

I thought they'd have more sense than to make her go through it all again.....and as the others have said, I didn't think she sang that well either. I'm dreading having to watch her again.

(And Greg was sexy!)

I agree, i dont wanna put down i kid but i didnt think she deserved a final place and if she hadnt messed up the first time i would not of expected her to go through

Exactly. I think people are forgetting GREG IS UNIQUE and Holly isn't (and all "talent shows" are full of kids who have worked for years in stage school rather than someone with an actual talent).

The same crew put Jamie Pugh out for being too nervous - oh pllease!