DS Forums

 
 

Have Humax Abandoned the Foxsat?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29-07-2009, 15:20
scarlet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
That said, if the auto switching is seen on the Panasonic is something we're going to see implemented by many other manufacturers, it might be Humax have to reconsider a redesign in the long term.
Quite. Bob said there were implications to redesigning the bootloader, but there are implications to NOT doing so as well.

Many people will have a reasonable idea of how they expect such a product to function (and/or may develop one during the course of using it), and as long as Humax don't deliver that - unwanted activation of video ports, forced automatic creation of folders for series links / inability to delete folders from the media manager interface, etc. - then people will start to look if the grass is greener somewhere else.
scarlet is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 29-07-2009, 15:42
mikeydb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol.
Posts: 1,783
I WISH MY TV WOULD AUTO SWITCH, it would save having to push four buttons on my remote to get to the HDMI input selection option.
mikeydb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-07-2009, 15:59
jonesyboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,330
I WISH MY TV WOULD AUTO SWITCH, it would save having to push four buttons on my remote to get to the HDMI input selection option.
IS THAT ALL. I have to press 5 buttons to get to my HDMI input. I do live a bit further west than you in Somerset. I want autoswitching
jonesyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-07-2009, 21:00
hillel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 207
Tern,

Your glib response shows little consideration for facts to which you are not privy.
Bob,

Why not get him a job in Humax for, say, a week. I'm sure he'll have a new release finished for you in (irish) jig time. :yawn:
hillel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-07-2009, 21:17
Flyer 10
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,556
IS THAT ALL. I have to press 5 buttons to get to my HDMI input. I do live a bit further west than you in Somerset. I want autoswitching
Sounds like my mates Samsung, he wanted to sell it after a month of use.
Flyer 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 08:51
Bob_Cat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 1,302
Please note, if your TV doesn't auto-switch then it is not related to Humax, auto-switching is a function of the TV upon receiving an input. I am aware that some TVs have been manufactured to only support auto-switching on their primary HDMI but I cannot confirm which models.

Bob
Bob_Cat is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 09:14
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
Why not get him a job in Humax for, say, a week. I'm sure he'll have a new release finished for you in (irish) jig time. :yawn:
Hello, sleepyhead!

When you've properly woken up you might be embarrassed at the fatuousness of the above remark.

Do you belive that. overall, Hitler was bad at governing Germany?

If not, does that imply you think you could goven a country?

Do you believe that our trains are run perfectly?

If not does that imply that you think you could run a national railway system ?

Can you see where we're going with this?

Someone recognising that something has been performed, designed or implemented incompetantly does not necessarily imply that that person believes they could do a better job.

If a surgeon operated on you and left some instruments inside, you could certainly complain about their competance without some dimwit implying that because you are not a surgeon you should not be complaining.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 09:34
White-Knight
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,494
IS THAT ALL. I have to press 5 buttons to get to my HDMI input. I do live a bit further west than you in Somerset. I want autoswitching
That's just bad tv design I'm afraid.

I think whatever way you look at it, auto switching is a bad idea. Even if every connected device's vendor implements the signals properly, there will be problems from time to time and there's going to be nothing more annoying than your tv switching to the wrong input at some vital moment.
Far better to have manual switching.

Some manufacturers could do to take a leaf out of Pioneers design manual. Want to change input, they're right here:

http://img118.imageshack.us/i/pioneerremote.jpg/

Sometimes the simplest designs are the best!
White-Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 09:51
snaithg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,196
...............I think whatever way you look at it, auto switching is a bad idea. Even if every connected device's vendor implements the signals properly, there will be problems from time to time and there's going to be nothing more annoying than your tv switching to the wrong input at some vital moment.
Far better to have manual switching........
And I take the opposite view!

I think that TV inputs that "autoswitch" can be extremely useful.

If I was designing a TV, I would ensure that each input was capable of "autoswitching" but there would also be an option in the setup menu to switch this feature on/off for each input, individually. This should keep everyone happy.



Graham.
snaithg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 10:03
froxfieldrover
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 253
That's just bad tv design I'm afraid.
/[/url]

Sometimes the simplest designs are the best!
I had a similar problem with my Samsung tv. I had to cycle it 6/7 times after every time I went to my other device after using the Humax, the other (Sony) device had a rgb individual cables connection - experimenting (out of frustration) I changed that to a scart connection, letting the tv do the upsizing, as it didn't really make that much difference. Now it remembers where I was and I don't need to do the cycling anymore.

It made quite a difference!

Patrick
froxfieldrover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 12:40
jonesyboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,330
And I take the opposite view!

I think that TV inputs that "autoswitch" can be extremely useful.

If I was designing a TV, I would ensure that each input was capable of "autoswitching" but there would also be an option in the setup menu to switch this feature on/off for each input, individually. This should keep everyone happy.



Graham.
On balance I would agree with you. I really would prefer autoswitching rather than a badly designed Pioneer remote, with keys scattered around.
jonesyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 20:28
hillel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 207
Hello, sleepyhead!
Hello yourself.

Someone recognising that something has been performed, designed or implemented incompetantly does not necessarily imply that that person believes they could do a better job.
Thats absolutely true. However, you have taken a position on Humax that would indicate that you have considerable expertise in the area of software/hardware integration.
If that is not the case, your comments are somewhat rash.

I have many years of professional experience, in the software development area. I appreciate the level of effort required to bring a product of this nature to market. I don't disagree that there are some issues with the Humax box - indeed, mine has been turned off for a number of months now. However, the Humax box is easily the equal of the Sky HD equivalent. Considering the relative maturity of the Sky platform, and the development budget available to their suppliers, this reflects very well on Humax.
hillel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-07-2009, 23:23
White-Knight
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,494

If I was designing a TV, I would ensure that each input was capable of "autoswitching" but there would also be an option in the setup menu to switch this feature on/off for each input, individually. This should keep everyone happy.


Graham.
As I said above, the problem with that is when you get a glitch.

A glitch can't physically press a remote button, but it can make your tv change channels with auto switching when you don't want it to though ruining whatever you're doing.

Then there's always issues of compatibility, as we've already seen.

You're entitled to your view, and I'm entitled to mine, but somehow I think buttons are far safer and given its no harder than changing channels, I fail to see the hassle.
White-Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-07-2009, 09:35
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
Thats absolutely true. However, you have taken a position on Humax that would indicate that you have considerable expertise in the area of software/hardware integration.
If that is not the case, your comments are somewhat rash.
I do indeed have (too) many years such experience.

That's why I don't make any fuss about the delete 'feature' because I recognise that that is a complex issue relating to the interaction between the Humax software and the Linux file system.

Similarly I can make an educated guess that if Humax are saying they can't fix the 'input switch on boot' problem then that is down to port not being clamped and thus 'activating' as soon as the device is switched out of standby - i.e. before the bootloader has even started. If this is the case then it would need a hardware mod to fix. The idea that no one could make a simple change to the boot loader is a little weird unless it's for reasons I mentioned elsewhere.

On the other hand there is a good list of UI idiocies that should have been sorted out within weeks.

However, the Humax box is easily the equal of the Sky HD equivalent. Considering the relative maturity of the Sky platform, and the development budget available to their suppliers, this reflects very well on Humax.
I am on record as saying that the Humax is an excellent box and even if there is never an update I'll still be very happy with mine.

Nonetheless I bought the box as an early adopter on the basis of Humax's reputation for sorting out bugs quickly and efficiently so I don't think that let's Humax off the hook.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-07-2009, 10:35
Ardee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 121
I don't think that the auto-switching problem is anything to do with the bootloader. I suspect that it is simply that the pins on the SCART and HDMI switching pins have zero volts on them when the Humax is powered down, and when the power comes on the switching voltage is applied constantly because the Humax designers did not implement the facility properly. Most TV's don't yet have auto-switching on HDMI, and most people who buy the HDR do not use SCART, or the problem would be more noticeable. Panasonic, on the other hand, have stuck rigidly to the book. More manufacturers are likely to in the future, as auto-switching is a good feature when done properly.

It might be that the HDR was originally designed to have what I would consider to be a proper standby mode, where the power was left on the SCART/HDMI pins and the operating system stayed in memory, so the problem did not occur. Perhaps at a late stage some bright spark then suggested that it would save a few watts a year if it powered down completely, and nobody thought it through. Only conjecture, of course, but it would explain how such a glaring error slipped through the net.
Ardee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-07-2009, 10:53
emdee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 62
As I said above, the problem with that is when you get a glitch.

A glitch can't physically press a remote button, but it can make your tv change channels with auto switching when you don't want it to though ruining whatever you're doing.
I'll live with the glitches. Maybe I'm lucky but I don't think I've ever had a random autoswitch from SCART or from HDMI. So, autoswitching for me please. I'd even rather the Hummy's broken implementation than none at all.
emdee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 16:35
RobinB
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West London
Posts: 110
On the other hand there is a good list of UI idiocies that should have been sorted out within weeks.
True - On the whole I find I work around those oddities, but you're right. There are some issues which don't seem to involve high-risk changes, purely UI flow and it would have been nice to see some interim release - even if it had to be downloaded and USB flashed.

I am on record as saying that the Humax is an excellent box and even if there is never an update I'll still be very happy with mine.
I remember the first time we sat spooling up and down an HD recording in chase-playback and thinking "this is damned impressive!"

Nonetheless I bought the box as an early adopter on the basis of Humax's reputation for sorting out bugs quickly and efficiently so I don't think that let's Humax off the hook.
Indeed - I'd not been a Humax customer before the Foxsat PVR, but I'd seen online references to people downloading new software for previous products and thought that all looked quite promising..... I wonder what caused the change in behaviour (or is my memory wrong?).

I've said before that I can see the reason for some reluctance to deliver dribs and drabs of changes to the UI over the air - Customers buy the product, get it home, use it for a few days and then discover that it has changed, and it behaves differently from the manual.
.... I wonder what Humax have planned for custommer comms when this manyana release eventually hits the streets.

Oh well, I suppose they keep DS busy with us lot coming back to see if anything is being rumoured!
RobinB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 01:18
Lengster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,247
It's a small but important request.

PLEASE BOBCAT! Tell someone to sort out the shocking grammar in the UI. When I'm asked to choose between HD/SD recording, the word choice is horrendous. Have a look for yourself.

I suggest something like: "This programme is available in SD and HD. Please specify which you want to record."

It would require - I assume - a tiny little upgrade. Please?
Lengster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:07
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,537
I suggest something like: "This programme is available in SD and HD. Please specify which you want to record."
Specify? Not a very user friendly word when sat at home in your comfy TV chair after a hard day at the office sitting through interminable meetings and a morass of babblespeak. What is wrong with choose?
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 12:40
hillel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 207
Specify? Not a very user friendly word when sat at home in your comfy TV chair after a hard day at the office sitting through interminable meetings and a morass of babblespeak. What is wrong with choose?
I feel your pain, those "interminable meetings" get to me too.

Why not, just: "Choose Standard Definition or High Definition"?

The truth is, of course, that everyone has their own opinion as to what works best. In my game, we have much more arguements about the UI side of development than we ever have about the technical implementation. There is a strong arguement for having consumer panels as part of the developoment cycle for projects such as these.
hillel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 13:37
Lengster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,247
Ok whatever! The point isn't the new wording, it's replacing the shocking old wording.
Lengster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 13:58
Flyer 10
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,556
Who cares about that, theres literally hundreds of things that should be fixed before that.
Flyer 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 14:17
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,537
Ok whatever! The point isn't the new wording, it's replacing the shocking old wording.
The point is that choosing the right wording is not that simple. At the very least it needs someone with a different mindset by think about *what* the user wants to do and not *how* the tech guys make things happen. This is something a good Technical Author could bring to the party (although good ones are as rare as hen's teeth and the bad ones make things worse by not only mangling the language but mangling the meaning as well).
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 15:07
Lengster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,247
The point is that choosing the right wording is not that simple. At the very least it needs someone with a different mindset by think about *what* the user wants to do and not *how* the tech guys make things happen. This is something a good Technical Author could bring to the party (although good ones are as rare as hen's teeth and the bad ones make things worse by not only mangling the language but mangling the meaning as well).
I think people are misunderstanding me. The error I'm asking to be changed isn't "poorly" worded as such, it doesn't make sense. Read it and see; it's something like "Choose programme what you want."
Lengster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 16:01
nwhitfield
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,517
I think people are misunderstanding me. The error I'm asking to be changed isn't "poorly" worded as such, it doesn't make sense. Read it and see; it's something like "Choose programme what you want."
The new Panasonic recorders aren't much better

"The same programme in High Definition picture quality exists"

When I saw that, I wondered if it was translated or written by a native German speaker.
nwhitfield is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:24.