DS Forums

 
 

Children in Need Special in November - CONTAINS SPOLIERS


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23-06-2009, 10:30
Lem_1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 421

Anyone know if this is true or just a wind-up?

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/23/who_special/

Last edited by Lem_1 : 23-06-2009 at 10:32. Reason: Spoliers alert
Lem_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-06-2009, 10:46
Histeria
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,843
Colour me highly sceptical.
Histeria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 11:59
Corwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,601
As pointed out in the other thread on this subject The Mirror (where this story is from) ran pretty much the same story last year (no Matt Smith).
Corwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 12:10
Rubydoll
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,156
As pointed out in the other thread on this subject The Mirror (where this story is from) ran pretty much the same story last year (no Matt Smith).
Just thought I'd pop in with the Telegraph's take on it, They are reporting it too.x

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...-off-show.html
Rubydoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 12:12
Histeria
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,843
Just thought I'd pop in with the Telegraph's take on it, They are reporting it too.x

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...-off-show.html
To be fair, The Telegraph are just reporting that The Mirror reported it.
Histeria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 12:29
crazzyaz7
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
And DS have gone the opposite way for once!!!



http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/cult/a16...n-reports.html
crazzyaz7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 12:34
Johna456
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 281
well RTD did say we were going to get one more suprise this could be it.
Johna456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 12:40
stcoop
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,134
well RTD did say we were going to get one more suprise this could be it.
I have this lovely bridge I'd like to sell you, if you're interested.
stcoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 12:46
performingmonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,064
This would be brilliant if true, though I doubt it. I would be particularly pleased to see Eccleston and McGann onscreen. Considering it's for charity I think the actors might be up for it.
performingmonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 12:48
stcoop
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,134
This would be brilliant if true, though I doubt it. I would be particularly pleased to see Eccleston and McGann onscreen. Considering it's for charity I think the actors might be up for it.
And yet they weren't up for it when exactly the same paper ran exactly the same story (minus Matt Smith's name) last year...

I suppose their thinking is if they run it enough times it's bound to be accurate one day.
stcoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 16:22
Johna456
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 281
I have this lovely bridge I'd like to sell you, if you're interested.
And what is that supposed to mean,
Johna456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 16:29
cobaltmale
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dunfermline ♂
Posts: 20,150
And what is that supposed to mean,
That you might be a touch gullible.

It's a reference to the sale of London Bridge.

G
cobaltmale is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 16:42
Johna456
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 281
Not gullible at all, just stateing what RTD said a couple of weeks back which could mean anything really.

No need for childish comments no wonder why i hardly post on this site,
Johna456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2009, 16:46
chuffnobbler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,542
Would be nice.
Won't happen.
chuffnobbler is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:57.