• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Alex On The Telly This Saturday, 10/01/04.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
Avolon
11-01-2004
Glued to Alex's face on TV is not my idea of a saturday nights TV.
No, darling I recorded the show, unlike you who will add his 90 second appearance to your (Alex on TV for a split second) collection, I have already recorded over his Cain Dingle ugly mug.
darling
11-01-2004
I'd happily stay in to watch Alex. It's the others I can't be ars*d about.

I notice you got in there quickly about having wiped the tape - in case anyone who missed it asked for a lend. I can understand you not wanting to risk it to the post. You must have a bigger tape collection on Alex than I have.
Vilt UK
11-01-2004
Just saw the tape this morning-ran through to the Alex bit-he looks fit and well-when was it recorded.?
Never liked beards or thick stubble though -poor Mel!

The programme was toilet though was it not.

By association -not good really-Agent orange time I think.

I also do not know how to interprete the fact that Dale and/ or his scripters did not seem to know who Alex was!
They said he was in BB4 when of course we all know he was in BB3.

I am suprised Alex did not say anything-perhaps he is not suited to live TV.
Not sure he has actually done any?perhaps he should have done the Rise thing last summer-at least it would have been something for the CV and he probably would have been gifted the TV spot for a week after as well.

Perhaps he is having trouble sorting out who his friends are?
bystander
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Vilt UK
..........perhaps he should have done the Rise thing last summer-at least it would have been something for the CV and he probably would have been gifted the TV spot for a week after as well. ......”

Alex didn't do RI:SE because he took it too personally that Kate had nominated him a couple of times. He's been sulking ever since.
Vilt UK
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by bystander
Alex didn't do RI:SE because he took it too personally that Kate had nominated him a couple of times. He's been sulking ever since. ”

cannot believe he would be as childish as that.(or his agent)

after all they made it up for sophies wedding so she got her money did they not
Avolon
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Vilt UK
[b]cannot believe he would be as childish as that.( B]”

Believe it Vilt, he is that childish. .
rosemary
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by bystander
Alex didn't do RI:SE because he took it too personally that Kate had nominated him a couple of times. He's been sulking ever since. ”

Alex was commited to doing LBC a couple of mornings a week....I know he's good..but even Alex can't be in two place at once

...Btw Dale knew exactly who he was, hence the reference to "Thats the way.."...He obviously just forgot about BB4
bystander
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by rosemary
Alex was commited to doing LBC a couple of mornings a week....I know he's good..but even Alex can't be in two place at once ................... ”


As one of the stars of BB3 I'm sure RI:SE woulde have fitted in with Alex's busy work schedule of 2 mornings a week at LBC.

I'm sticking with the incredible sulk theory.
EddyBee
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by bystander
As one of the stars of BB3 I'm sure RI:SE woulde have fitted in with Alex's busy work schedule of 2 mornings a week at LBC.

I'm sticking with the incredible sulk theory.
”

Alex would never compromise his credibility by appearing on a tacky show like SU:NK.
bystander
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay
Alex would never compromise his credibility by appearing on a tacky show like SU:NK. ”

Not even for an old friend for old times sake?
Avolon
11-01-2004
RI:SE Would've went of the air quicker, if Mr No Job, no credebility, no talent..... Sibley had ever appeared on the show.

As for his ten minute slot On LBC, where he admitted he didn't even look at BB4 but still had the arrogance to give his worthless opinion.
Vilt UK
11-01-2004
I think Alex would have been an asset to Rise -and vice versa.
albeit quite a tiny asset.
lulu g
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by bystander
Not even for an old friend for old times sake? ”

I know Alex and Dougie are with the same agency, but I'm not sure they are old friends exactly.
swingaleg
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by lulu g
I know Alex and Dougie are with the same agency........”

So how come Dougie gets a job working for Kate and Alex, err, doesn't...................
lulu g
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by swingaleg
So how come Dougie gets a job working for Kate and Alex, err, doesn't................... ”

I think you'll find that Dougie was with RI:SE long before Kate got the junior's job.
swingaleg
11-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by lulu g
I think you'll find that Dougie was with RI:SE long before Kate got the junior's job. ”

Yet Kate rose to be the boss and Dougie stayed as a bit part player

Is that what their agency specialises in ?

ontwofronts
12-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay
Alex would never compromise his credibility by appearing on a tacky show like SU:NK. ”

Did this quote really appear in a thread about Alex appearing on a look-a-likes awards show?
EddyBee
12-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by ontwofronts
Did this quote really appear in a thread about Alex appearing on a look-a-likes awards show? ”

A perfectly respectable awards show, watched by millions, cannot posibly be compared to the pornographic SU:NK.
darling
12-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by bystander
As one of the stars of BB3 I'm sure RI:SE woulde have fitted in with Alex's busy work schedule of 2 mornings a week at LBC.
I'm sticking with the incredible sulk theory.
”

He was also doing an excellent Now column (honest and funny as ever) and evening shows at LBC. But I expect he could have gone on RI:SE too if he had wanted to. He probably wanted to avoid Kate.

Its good sense, of course, to avoid people who have proved utterly immoral and treacherous in their dealings with you. Its got nothing whatsoever to do with sulking.

But you know this of course bystander since the objectionable aspects of Kate's behaviour towards Alex have been explained repeatedly. Like Kate herself, you just don't choose to acknowledge it. :sleep:
Last edited by darling : 12-01-2004 at 19:51
Vilt UK
12-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
He was also doing an excellent Now column (honest and funny as ever) and evening shows at LBC. But I expect he could have gone on RI:SE too if he had wanted to. He probably wanted to avoid Kate.

Its good sense, of course, to avoid people who have proved utterly immoral and treacherous in their dealings with you. Its got nothing whatsoever to do with sulking.

But you know this of course bystander since the objectionable aspects of Kate's behaviour towards Alex have been explained repeatedly. Like Kate herself, you just don't choose to acknowledge it. :sleep:
”

do you always hurt the ones you love?

I thought this was an Alex thread.-oh well.
Marky de Salade
13-01-2004
i saw a bit of the repeat yesterday
didnt have the perseverance for all of it
as truthfully it was pretty tacky
Avolon
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
Its good sense, of course, to avoid people who have proved utterly immoral and treacherous in their dealings with you. Its got nothing whatsoever to do with sulking. ”

Was Alex in-love with Kate?

Did Kate and Alex promise each other in the BB3 house that they would start dating when they left the BB3 house?
bystander
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
.....I expect he could have gone on RI:SE too if he had wanted to. He probably wanted to avoid Kate.

Its good sense, of course, to avoid people who have proved utterly immoral and treacherous in their dealings with you. Its got nothing whatsoever to do with sulking.....
”

From the strange variety of stuff that Alex has done it's quite obvious that television, like modelling, is just business. That being the case, him not not doing RI:SE, in all the time that Kate was there, was personal and dare I repeat, a sulk. A common personallity trait for an only child who never got to follow the van into the garage.
darling
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by bystander
From the strange variety of stuff that Alex has done it's quite obvious that television, like modelling, is just business. That being the case, him not not doing RI:SE, in all the time that Kate was there, was personal and dare I repeat, a sulk. A common personallity trait for an only child who never got to follow the van into the garage. ”

He could have on request Which is why he had no reason whatsoever to sulk! As well you know.
darling
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Avolon
Was Alex in-love with Kate?
Did Kate and Alex promise each other in the BB3 house that they would start dating when they left the BB3 house?
”

No and she had no chance are the only possible answers to those questions.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map