Originally Posted by Dave 909:
“ But I also recall there being like a 2000 year age limit on the lifespan.
The 2000 year thing never seems to get mentioned on here from memory so I mat have got it wrong an in fact the 2000 year age limit may have simply been a comment\idea that may have been mentioned in those hard backs of the 80's I used to get.
Anyone else ever recall the 2000 age limit?.”
Um...nope!

I think you've imagined that one, sorry!
Originally Posted by Steve Hartley:
“In the 5 Doctors the first (Hurndall/Hartnell) asks of the current incumbent (Davison) "Regeneration?" to which Davison replies "4th" and Hurndall counters with "Goodness me so there are 5 of me now"”
Originally Posted by Histeria:
“Yup. Also the 8th Doctor states of McCoy "In all my travels through space and time, and nearing the end of my seventh life, I was finally beginning to realise that you could never be too careful"
”
Plus in
Mawdryn Undead the Doctor says he's regenerated four times so far and has eight left... in
The Three Doctors the Time Lords refer to Hartnell's Doctor as being the earliest... in
Time And The Rani the Doctor refers to his new self as "my seventh persona"... in
The Next Doctor there are flashback clips of all the Doctors from Hartnell to Tennant with nobody else beforehand... same as in several other stories where the Doctor's had his mind scanned i.e.
Resurrection Of The Daleks.
In short, when dealing with contradictions in Doctor Who continuity, I always go with the idea that when there's an
overwhelming amount of evidence to suggest one version of events and only one little thing which doesn't fit, the simplest option is to go with the majority and reconcile/retcon the single counter-example. Doing it the other way would involve coming up with tortuously contrived explanations for all of the above examples, probably involving the Doctor and the Time Lords all lying/being amnesiac, etc.