WADA LOVELY COUPLE
How Kate Lawler fell for Woodgate's wedge


SHE'S been telling friends and family she's smitten with Jonathan Woodgate - but we've found out that for Kate Lawler it wasn't love at first sight.

In fact, when the RI:SE presenter first laid eyes on her new boyfriend, she described him as a "toad" and refused his desperate requests for a date.

Until, that is, she found out he takes home a salary of £30,000 a week.

Read on here!

i can see how £30,000 p/w might make him attractive to some women...

gotta love "the mirror", though!

Be careful what you say about "The Mirror", some people on here actually believe what they read in it.

Thanks Hey Baby ... you're a pal.

It's just as I thought. What a disgrace.

Interesting. She didn't know who he was, so she looked him up on the Internet. Presumably what she found there would include accounts of his racist-thug criminal past, and yet it was his photograph that put her off.

Some people choose to disbelieve the bits that don't suit them and go as far as to re-word stories that go against there version of events.....That sort of thing bystander?

Well said lulu. Decent people would avoid him like the plague.

True Mes, some people will do that but it's pretty safe to say that most people don't take too seriously what's written in the tabloids............on reflection.

Actually, I don't remember anyone re-wording the story about Cameron in The Mirror..................did they?

Most people didn't accept what looked like a hyped up story but that's understandable.

Doubly so if a story mysteriously agree with what a lot of people had been saying about Cameron Stout's habit of making threats and that really wouldn't help the discussion here so it's a really really good idea if you were a Cameron fan to try and put as much doubt into it as possible to the extent of having to dismiss every single tabloid story ever written as beng made up...on reflection I can see how you'd come by that view...yes......

Yes....Iain has been doing it...he;s been suggesting a drunk women was harrassing him....




Most people...no bystander...that's not true......You and Iain won't accept it.....most people would have simply read about it and forgot about it.....You and Iain decided to fight it with a passion, failing to disprove it at any point....You are now suggesting it was "hyped up"...so I take it you are trying to re-write a three paragraph story hidden away on page 14 of an old Mirror so that's it's more appealing to your point of view........?

I thought it was the other way around, you constantly repeating your crucifixion of Cameron, using the story in The Mirror to back up your views. I can't speak for Iain but I don't think he's particularly passionate about Cameron, anymore than I am. It's more to do with using a bit of common sense when reading the tabloids.

[quote]Originally posted by bystander
I thought it was the other way around, you constantly repeating your crucifixion of Cameron, using the story in The Mirror to back up your views.

No...I had it right...We make our point and then have to listen to excuses about why Cameron is a fluffy bunny....We simply point out that we were totally right about Cameron....The Mirror story is merely one example..but it does back our views up and that's why ther eis thois desperation to debunk it.....with no success...

I can't speak for Iain but I don't think he's particularly passionate about Cameron

But he only appears when Cameron is under examination....why is he not as passionate in the defense of the other 48ish of them.....

, anymore than I am.

Oh you aren't Bystander......????

It's more to do with using a bit of common sense when reading the tabloids.

Riiiiiight....okay.....So all this passionate defense of just one BB contestant is simply the need for common sense....Whatever

This is 100% true-well done.

I also am no friend of Cameron -Ray or Jon or Nush were better winners but the evil Mirror is anti BB -(and is anti BB people when it suits them) why do you not all see that-it has been shown clearly before.

They lie basically for money.
YES 3-0!

.....or conversely, if you weren't a Cameron fan, to try and make the story sound as plausible as possible.

If the story in The Mirror is one example of how totally right you are about Cameron I presume there have been more credible stories published to count as real proof.

A better proof of Cameron not being such a bad person is the fact that, as far as I know, nobody from his past has come out and slagged him off.

Nope..better proof is the violent threats, the homophobia and his attitude to Asylum Seekers....Simply the absence of anyone slagging us off isn't actual "proof" of anything.....

But you would have thought that if Cameron was a truly violent or homophobic person, in this media led world where everyone wants a story, there would have been plenty of people happy to get in the spotlight and reveal all.

The best proof and confirmation that Cameron isn't such a bad guy, is Jon, who knows him far better than any of us, inside and outside the house. He seems to quite like Cameron.

Either that, or he's just pretending to like him so as to avoid offending any Cameron fans. :sleep:

The celebrity world seems as bad as politics for pretence bordering on outright lying.

This is a bit wierd??????????????????????????

The article was not published in the Daily Mirror yesterday-it is just a link to an old thoroughly discredited piece of garbage published back in September.

Why drag it back up and try to make it look like it is a new piece of Mirror garbage???????????????with yesterdays date on it??

Were you trying to tell us something subtle about the Mirror press-if so well done-but possibly a bit too subtle for some of the jokers who read this forum.

Hey Baby didn't say it was published yesterday. He i sjust using it to show how fake & how money grabbing Kate is seen by some to be.

also did not say it wasn't-most of linked articles are current-as well you know as you do most of them yourself on this forum.
Economical with the truth-for whatever reason.

Is Hey baby a man? Never come across "him"before-seems to have zoomed in from neverneverland.

she isn't

I don't.see her that way.

As a small assist she is known to have turned down loads of money immedietley post BB as she did not want to be just a celeb personality but wanted to build a credible career which she has done.
The opposite is Jade who chose as much cash as possible as quickly as possible .

She just wants to remain in the spotlight.

Anyone remember the Charlie Mizon story? Or her snogging of many men just to get a profile?

why change the subject-i invited you to explain yourself above.
your credibility is in question here as a fm.

Excuse me but Hey Baby has been a member of DS for a year longer than yourself Vilt, what exactly are you questioning?

Erm, I was posting something I stumbled across. Or maybe that's illegal in Vilt UK's tyrannic, fascist regime?