• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Kate's planning to marry Woody? Reasons why here:
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
thenetworkbabe
13-01-2004
The reason why it is futile to speculate on why some forum members support or hate particular contestants is of course the same reason why the Mirror can't know what Kate really feels about her boyfriend.
Last edited by thenetworkbabe : 13-01-2004 at 03:29
EddyBee
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by thenetworkbabe
The fact that the Mirror ......etc etc etc harlot.. ”

I can see that you put a lot of work in to this particular effort of yours in order to attempt to hide your abuse .......but all you are really doing, with your twists of language, use of the third person and tedious metaphors, is calling me a whore because I have the nerve to disagree with you on a TV show's discussion board.

Of course this sort of response speaks volumes about you.
EddyBee
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by thenetworkbabe
The reason why it is futile to speculate on why some forum members support or hate particular contestants is of course the same reason why the Mirror can't know what Kate really feels about her boyfriend. ”

But you do it. You do it all the time. Are you suggesting that everyone else cannot enjoy the same posting rights as you?
EddyBee
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay
I can see that you put a lot of work in to this particular effort of yours in order to attempt to hide your abuse .......but all you are really doing, with your twists of language, use of the third person and tedious metaphors, is calling me a whore because I have the nerve to disagree with you on a TV show's discussion board.

Of course this sort of response speaks volumes about you.
”

I wish to apologise to thenetworkbabe for my comments here which I totally withdraw. Re-reading her post it is quite clear that she was not referring to me as I have described above.

I am very sorry for not paying more attention when I first read the post in question.
Last edited by EddyBee : 13-01-2004 at 10:04
Avolon
13-01-2004
MYOB
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay

I am very sorry for not paying more attention when I first read the post in question.
”

Have you learned anything else on re-reading the passage a second time?
EddyBee
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by MYOB
Have you learned anything else on re-reading the passage a second time? ”

Yes, not to post whilst half a sleep. My apology to the person concerned is a genuine one. However, I stand by all my other comments on this thread.
HeyBaby
13-01-2004
That's not the point. The point is that Kate hates racism and has contradicted herself in the past few months by going out with someone with standard as of the Klu Klux Klan.
Avolon
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by HeyBaby
That's not the point. The point is that Kate hates racism and has contradicted herself in the past few months by going out with someone with standard as of the Klu Klux Klan. ”

And who might that be?
darling
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay
Yes, not to post whilst half a sleep. My apology to the person concerned is a genuine one. However, I stand by all my other comments on this thread. ”

I wouldn't be too apologetic about it Eej. The suggestion that you dislike certain people for anything other than the very valid reasons you have given was itself offensive enough to deserve a fairly sharp response IMO so TNWB doesn't have much to complain about.
EddyBee
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
I wouldn't be too apologetic about it Eej. The suggestion that you dislike certain people for anything other than the very valid reasons you have given was itself offensive enough to deserve a fairly sharp response IMO so TNWB doesn't have much to complain about. ”

TNWB has nothing to complain about at all.

What TNWB is saying is that you either agree with her TOTALLY or there must be something wrong with you, your opinion is worthless, you understand nothing, your sources are false, you are not allowed to voice a differing view on the singing abilities of a TV talent show contestant etc. I have seen this repeatedly from her ... if you don't like TNWB's precious little favourites ..... heaven help you.

However, I wrongly accused her of abusing me in a certain way and for that, and that alone, I apologise.
Last edited by EddyBee : 13-01-2004 at 21:22
Vilt UK
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by thenetworkbabe
The fact that the Mirror is read by millions makes its tabloid media reporting no more credible than The Sport or The Beano. The fact that it reports as fact things that it cannot possibly know going on in other people's heads suggests it is nearer the Beano in the fiction category.

It probably is unwise for someone who spends all of his time on the FA forum making the bizarre claim that the winner couldn't sing at all to raise the issue of why some people support particular contestants and others seem to genuinely hate them. Its not difficult to see why people might like the winners - thats why they win. Why people hate them raises all sort of darker issues though. Supporting the best singer seems logical. Claiming they can't sing when the music world, teachers, students and audience agree they sing brilliantly, is worthy of Canute on a bad day. Indeed, its actually so odd that it could lead people to futily speculate further on why some people always seem to take an almost instant dislike to any attractive, white female candidate on any recent, reality show - be they called Kate, Nush or Alexandra - usually citing the same reason, worthy of the Blackadder Bishop of Bath and Wells, that they are some degree of devious harlot..
”

Woh!!!
Wouldn't like to meet you late at night down a dark alley.
I like your style though.

I got a full house Kingsover8's btw

(reaches for pile of McD fries)
cannot seem to do "small script"like piranhaville
Vilt UK
13-01-2004
that they are some degree of devious harlow?

er correction-the t is silent-as in eejay.

do you think eejay should read it a third time?
Vilt UK
13-01-2004
i enjoyed that post by godot
piranhaville
13-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by Vilt UK
i enjoyed that post by godot ”

Which one?
Vilt UK
14-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by piranhaville
Which one? ”

we're still waiting for it.
lulu g
14-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by HeyBaby
That's not the point. The point is that Kate hates racism and has contradicted herself in the past few months by going out with someone with standard as of the Klu Klux Klan. ”

Does Kate hate racism?

That begs the question (with apologies to Mrs Merton), what on earth does Kate see in wealthy racist footballer Jonathan Woodgate?
EddyBee
14-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by lulu g
Does Kate hate racism?

That begs the question (with apologies to Mrs Merton), what on earth does Kate see in wealthy racist footballer Jonathan Woodgate?
”

A nasty violent thug, perhaps?
khane
14-01-2004
One cant begin to wonder what she sees in this violent racist lying thug. Certianly not his looks.

But I hope she realises that with her continued infatuation with the affray convicted and known violent toss pott that is Woodgate, she will certianlt start to be tared with the same brush.

Hopefully this will be the final nail in the coffin of kates media (HAHAHA) career.
EddyBee
14-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by khane
One cant begin to wonder what she sees in this violent racist lying thug. Certianly not his looks.

But I hope she realises that with her continued infatuation with the affray convicted and known violent toss pott that is Woodgate, she will certianlt start to be tared with the same brush.

Hopefully this will be the final nail in the coffin of kates media (HAHAHA) career.
”

Welcome to DS khane. You are very wise indeed.
Avolon
14-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by khane
Hopefully this will be the final nail in the coffin of kates media (HAHAHA) career. ”



Is it your dislike of Kate that makes you wish her ill-will, or are you always this bitter.?
khane
14-01-2004
Well quite obviously I dont wish her ill, after all she is nothing more than a wannabe that has had a fiar shot and (IMO) failed to prove herself.
I wish good luck to all those actor/presenters out there who are talented and have trained and worked their asses off to get the shot that Lawler had and blew.

As far as lawler goes yes i certianly hope that she gets no more work in the presenting field as she was (again IMO) terrible and taking jobs away from people who deserve them. Maybe she could write a coloum in a magazine ala Mel bb1?
But if stringing sentences together is a pre requisite then I cant see that happening either.

Begone Kate and take your Racist thug of a boyfriend with you.
skazza
14-01-2004
i kind of see where you're coming from, khane...and i speak as a neutral where kate is concerned, although in her defence i think she should have learned something from RI:SE and would (i hope) modify her style somewhat if she were to get another presenting job...
as for woodgate...
nah, can't think of anything nice to say about the man...and to cap it all he's a skunk ...
Avolon
14-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by khane

I wish good luck to all those actor/presenters out there who are talented and have trained and worked their asses off to get the shot that Lawler had and blew.

*What actors/presenters are you talking about?*


As far as lawler goes yes i certianly hope that she gets no more work in the presenting field as she was (again IMO) terrible and taking jobs away from people who deserve them. .
”

Who did she take *jobs* away from?
As for you not wanting Kate to get any more presenting jobs........that's okay by me. We ll have our likes and dislikes in this world. just one thing, the next time you hear of Kate starting a new job, be it on TV/Radio do your self a favour!. dont watch/Listen.
Vilt UK
14-01-2004
Quote:
“Originally posted by swingaleg
As a huge fan of Our Katie ( ) this does worry me somewhat, but I think i have the answer

As a fighter for justice and equality Kate has picked on this neanderthal to make an example of

She'll marry him at great personal sacrifice, make him give her all his money and use it to build orphanages for poor little children

So when you feel like taking a swipe at her, think of the children

Not only that but she'll make sure he has recurrent groin injuries which will keep him well away from the England squad for Portugal2004, so as not to sully our reputation in the sun spots of Europe

What a girl !!
”

For us footie geeks here is an interesting snippet from the Sun today-I guess santa 's liitle helpers missed it.It was written by one of the most respected footie writers in the country-not someones "friend."

START
Jon just right for Rio
By STEVEN HOWARD
WHILE Rio Ferdinand enters one end of the tunnel, Jonathan Woodgate is finally emerging from the other.
In the strange way fate works, Newcastle United centre-half Woodgate looks increasingly like the man to replace Ferdinand at Euro 2004.
At worst, he will give Chelsea’s John Terry a serious challenge as the man to partner Sol Campbell in Portugal this summer.
Both Ferdinand and Woodgate have had more than their share of controversy over the last few years — and both would find it hard to argue their problems were not self-inflicted.
In their time together at Leeds, Ferdinand saw at first hand the devastating effects lengthy court proceedings had on his Elland Road team-mate.
Though Woodgate was eventually cleared of GBH he was convicted of affray and served 100 hours’ community service — as well as an unofficial England ban.
As Ferdinand ponders his appeal against the eight-month ban that, at the moment, rules him out of Euro 2004, there is no little irony that Woodgate should be stating a strong case to take his place.
At the end of Sunday’s goalless draw at Old Trafford, the two players embraced.
Both understood what they had gone — or were going — through. If Ferdinand fails to get his ban reduced who would bet against him wanting Woodgate as his temporary successor?
Certainly, the Newcastle defender looks a changed man from the gaunt, hollow-eyed spectre who haunted Elland Road during and after his two trials.
When he arrived at St James’ Park, he promised Bobby Robson he would clean up his act.
This involved spending less time with his old circle of friends on Teesside — seen by many as the cause of most of his problems.
This he has done. He now lives on an exclusive estate just up the road from Alan Shearer.
If he does mix with team-mates, it is more likely to be with senior players.
He also appears to have settled into a long-term relationship with one-time Channel Four presenter Kate Lawler, a former Big Brother winner.
On the field, he has blossomed. Last Sunday, he was voted man of the match after snuffing out the threat of Ruud van Nistelrooy.
Though Ferdinand has surprised many with the level of his own play since failing to provide a drug test, United shareholders have long questioned the wisdom of his £30million transfer fee.
At £20m less, Woodgate is emerging as something of a bargain.
A bargain, that is, if he manages to steer clear of injury. He has already had two spells on the sidelines this season, first with a double hernia and then a hamstring problem.
This has restricted him to nine Premiership games. Yet, in these, Newcastle have looked a different proposition.
With Woodgate in the side, they are yet to lose — four wins, five draws and SIX clean sheets.
Of Sunday’s performance, former Arsenal striker Alan Smith said: “We are talking here about a finely balanced defender, who stays on his feet whenever possible, preferring to usher attackers out of harm’s way with wit and guile rather than recklessly diving in and conceding free-kicks.
“His positional play is sound. Rarely do you see him scrambling to recover having drifted out of bounds.”
Smith also praised his ‘economical running action’ and ‘quick anticipation of danger’.
All these qualities — though in an embryo stage — were seen when Woodgate made his England debut in Bulgaria in July 1999.
He was just 19 and had not even played for the Under-21 side.
Because of his on-going problems at Leeds, Woodgate has made just three further appearances.
But Ferdinand’s off-field problems have opened the door for a player Sven Goran Eriksson is especially keen on.
As well as Terry did against Turkey in Istanbul, there is the feeling that Woodgate’s more classically European style will be better suited to the ball-playing sides England face this summer.
With both Campbell and Terry prone to committing themselves in the tackle, you would feel more comfortable with Woodgate.
This composure and disinclination to dive in is supported by the facts — he has been booked just five times in the last 63 games.
But the bottom line is his remaining fit.
END
so no mention of the potentially libellous r word.

looks like Lawler has a big responsibility to become a national hero-like Lord Nelson say-she has to survive on meagre rations.
Well she did it for three weeks once and became recognised by the nation for her plucky spirit.
Now- a 6 month project.
Come on Katie you can do it for US-the nation.
or rather -not do it-well not too much though.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map