Originally Posted by Dilly 1:
“I dont see any point though in only going back the last two years. Its only by taking it back the three years that we get a truer picture of how the celebs have been allocated.”
It's arbitrary however you do it. But I just think you can't give the same weight to series four as you do to series six. It was too long ago. Whilst it would make sense to go mostly on series six, I added series five as well because frankly almost all the male celebs of series six were duds! I don't think you can necessarily say Flavia was so much worse off than Karen, Lilia, Ola or Kristina just because she got knocked out first. None of them really had a chance to do much more than mask their partner's lack of ability. Although Phil was spectacularly awful!
I'm not saying it's not valid to look at series four as well, just to me it is not relevant enough because it was so long ago. You might as well say that Darren doesn't deserve a break this year after dragging Jessie around for four weeks, because he did win five years ago