DS Forums

 
 

How do you think the pros regard Alesha's appointment


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2009, 17:54
Vivacious Lady
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,879
Fair enough about the difference between the technicalities of singing and dancing, but although the strictly panel may be a bit weak in terms of ballroom technique, Bruno and Craig do at least know quite a lot about the art in a general sense.

I don't think a panel of Bruno, Alesha, Craig and Len is any weaker than the DOI panel, which people seem to be forgetting includes Ruthie Henshall who knows absolutely f*** all about anything and is very opinionated and biased into the bargain. Alesha is more knowledgeable about the subject she's supposed to be judging than Ruthie is.

Although the DOI panel has three knowledgeable ice skaters on it, in reality, you're lucky if you get to hear from two of them as they don't all get to have their say and the spotlight is usually mugged by Ruthie and Jason.
I agree with your views on Ruthie, and do agree that both Ruthie and Jason tend to get more say. However, I think that the combination of Robin, Nicky and Karen is much stronger than that of Len, Craig and Bruno, although I suppose it could be argued that Robin was a figure skater rather than an ice dancer. (However Robin has been so successful in his career, and is such a likeable but firm judge that no-one has ever challenged his right to be head of the panel. )
Vivacious Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 12-07-2009, 18:02
LaurieMarlow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,894
I agree with your views on Ruthie, and do agree that both Ruthie and Jason tend to get more say. However, I think that the combination of Robin, Nicky and Karen is much stronger than that of Len, Craig and Bruno, although I suppose it could be argued that Robin was a figure skater rather than an ice dancer. (However Robin has been so successful in his career, and is such a likeable but firm judge that no-one has ever challenged his right to be head of the panel. )
Robin is an amazing judge - agreed. Everyone of them could learn from him.
LaurieMarlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 18:07
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
I never thought anything would happen that'd make the production of last year's semi final look competent...obviously I underestimated the stupidity of the BBC.
Fudd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 18:30
mossy2103
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
I never thought anything would happen that'd make the production of last year's semi final look competent...obviously I underestimated the stupidity of the BBC.
Albert Einstein once stated:

"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. "
mossy2103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 19:00
Alli-F
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: DOTS are evil!
Posts: 32,338
I think this is a very fair point about what Cheryl can and does bring to the table.

Cheryl was a huge success last year, not because of any pearls of wisdom she had as a judge, but because she looked good and interacted well with the contestants. I imagine this is exactly what the BBC want to achieve with Alesha. It's a very lazy strategy, yes. And I don't think it will achieve their aim of marketing the show to a younger audience. This is an ill conceived, ridiculous policy but I won't even get into that.

However, I don't think having Alesha on the panel will do the show any real harm. Those who watch the show will continue to do so, bar a few die hard Karen/Camilla/Arlene fans.


there are a number of main differences as far as I can see, firstly Cheryl gives her opinion, she does not contribute marks or have any say really in which contestant goes through until the judges' vote for the final two. Alesha gives her opinion and her marks or I presume she will, can you imagine the furore if Matt and partner are kept out of the bottom 2 by her marks?

Also, neither Cheryl or Ruthie Henshall ever appeared in the show they are then going on to judge, they had no relationship with contestants beforehand, either good or bad.

And finally, I do think that Alesha as a judge will harm the show, it will harm the great reputation that it has and it will certainly harm the show if she is either wishy-washy (which she may have to be as she knows virtually nothing about dance) or seen as biased which is bound to be at some point. This could be a disaster, especially if the dynamics of the show are altered and there is a lot of resentment and bad feeling. Look at what happened with Danni/Sharon, the public can definitely pick up on bad vibes. She was very popular, but already people are turning on her and there hasn't been any controversy yet.

After last year, I really thought that everyone would have kept their heads down and tried to get the good will of the public back, but noooooo, they do something even more disastrous!
Alli-F is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 19:26
Psychosis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,224
I don't think a panel of Bruno, Alesha, Craig and Len is any weaker than the DOI panel, which people seem to be forgetting includes Ruthie Henshall who knows absolutely f*** all about anything and is very opinionated and biased into the bargain. Alesha is more knowledgeable about the subject she's supposed to be judging than Ruthie is.

Although the DOI panel has three knowledgeable ice skaters on it, in reality, you're lucky if you get to hear from two of them as they don't all get to have their say and the spotlight is usually mugged by Ruthie and Jason.
Ruthie and Jason are VASTLY more qualified to be "performance" judges than Alesha is, giving than they both made their careers out of visual performance. Alesha did not and does not.
Psychosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 19:47
LaurieMarlow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,894
Ruthie and Jason are VASTLY more qualified to be "performance" judges than Alesha is, giving than they both made their careers out of visual performance. Alesha did not and does not.
Jason's a choreographer, which on some levels is fair enough, but don't forget we're talking about ice dancing here. As far as I know he's never been on a rink.

But Ruthie is a singer/actress, so I don't get your position on her. In fact, her form of singing, musical theatre is probably less 'visual' than Alesha's pop performance version.
LaurieMarlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 19:51
LaurieMarlow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,894
there are a number of main differences as far as I can see, firstly Cheryl gives her opinion, she does not contribute marks or have any say really in which contestant goes through until the judges' vote for the final two. Alesha gives her opinion and her marks or I presume she will, can you imagine the furore if Matt and partner are kept out of the bottom 2 by her marks?

Also, neither Cheryl or Ruthie Henshall ever appeared in the show they are then going on to judge, they had no relationship with contestants beforehand, either good or bad.

And finally, I do think that Alesha as a judge will harm the show, it will harm the great reputation that it has and it will certainly harm the show if she is either wishy-washy (which she may have to be as she knows virtually nothing about dance) or seen as biased which is bound to be at some point. This could be a disaster, especially if the dynamics of the show are altered and there is a lot of resentment and bad feeling. Look at what happened with Danni/Sharon, the public can definitely pick up on bad vibes. She was very popular, but already people are turning on her and there hasn't been any controversy yet.

After last year, I really thought that everyone would have kept their heads down and tried to get the good will of the public back, but noooooo, they do something even more disastrous!
I agree with the differences you point out. I never suggested that having Alesha was exactly the same as having Cheryl or Ruthie, just that there were some similarities.

I think the fact that she has such a close bond with Matthew could be potentially problematic.

I think that most of the people on this board are very heavily invested in the show and care about it. But there are lots of others out there who don't particularly care about the technicalities. Alesha's beauty and character could become a very positive attribute for these people.

I'm much more into the technicalities of singing than dancing, and from my point of view, Cheryl makes an absolutely rubbish judge for x factor. But from the point of view of the general public, her beauty, her connection with the contestants has made her a total hit.

Personally, I'm not thrilled about having Alesha as a judge, mostly because of the message that's being sent out about older females on tv, but I really doubt it will be a total disaster. I can imagine it being quite successful actually.
LaurieMarlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 19:59
Psychosis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,224
Jason's a choreographer, which on some levels is fair enough, but don't forget we're talking about ice dancing here. As far as I know he's never been on a rink.

But Ruthie is a singer/actress, so I don't get your position on her. In fact, her form of singing, musical theatre is probably less 'visual' than Alesha's pop performance version.
Have you seen Ruthie in Chicago, for example? She has to dance in musical theatre too.

Ruthie, Jason, and Alesha, are not there to judge technique (although I agree that they should be). They are there to judge performance.

Ruthie is a trained dancer, singer and actress. Jason is a choreographer. Alesha is a singer. See the difference? When judging dance performance, Ruthie is an experienced dancer and performer, Jason is an experienced dancer and choreographer, and Alesha is an experienced, er... singer.
Psychosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 20:03
LaurieMarlow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,894
Have you seen Ruthie in Chicago, for example? She has to dance in musical theatre too.

Ruthie, Jason, and Alesha, are not there to judge technique (although I agree that they should be). They are there to judge performance.

Ruthie is a trained dancer, singer and actress. Jason is a choreographer. Alesha is a singer. See the difference? When judging dance performance, Ruthie is an experienced dancer and performer, Jason is an experienced dancer and choreographer, and Alesha is an experienced, er... singer.
Having just glanced at her wiki page, Alesha's had as much (if not more) dance training as Ruthie has. She was in a girl band remember.

I fail to see how dancing in chicago translates into being qualified to judge an ice dancing competition.

Alesha knows the basics of ballroom, which is far more than can be said for Ruthie and ice skating.
LaurieMarlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 20:09
Psychosis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,224
Being in a girl band was not dance training. I've seen Mis Teeq live numerous times and they did not dance. They just bounced around a bit.

Ruthie is actually a trained dancer. She went to school and college and trained for it.
Psychosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 20:14
katie_p
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,715

Alesha knows the basics of ballroom
I don't think Alesha does know the basics of ballroom. She knows how to perform the routines Matt choreographed and taught her. That doesn't come close to knowing the basics of an individual dance. If someone told her to dance a basic cha cha she would not know what to do, other than try and fit her "Crazy in Love" routine to whatever music was played.

I'm not having a go at Alesha- this is true of all Strictly contestants.

I would imagine the pros are still happy to take part for the salary and the exposure or they simply wouldn't sign up. After all this time rightly or wrongly they must have got used to being classed as 'workers' rather than 'stars'. My guess is that as they all liked Alesha as a contestant they will get over this quickly and get on with their jobs.
Given that this has apparently been done quite secretly, it's not impossible that the pros have already signed up without knowing anything about the Alesha situation.

Remember the judges don't judge the pros although they often compliment them. Why should Alesha be any different if she is judging performance rather than technical skills? Having been through the whole experience at least she will be able to identify a hard routine or a very technical one.
If it was me I would be offended if someone with very little basic knowledge started criticising someone I had spent a long week teaching. As far as I can see, even if she directs all her remarks to the dancing of the celebrity, those remarks are still directed at the work of the pros- their abilities to teach, choreogaph and help their celebs as much as possible. To hear the celebs criticised without any knowledge to back it up would be pretty galling.
katie_p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 20:16
BuddyBontheNet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Away with the faries
Posts: 27,378
Ruthie does know about performing though i.e. the artistic side of things.

I don't agree that Arlene, Craig and Bruno are only there to judge on the performance. I think that is simplifying things a bit too much and that they are all well qualified to judge dancing in general as basic technique is important. Len is the only one qualified to judge ballroom/Latin dancing.

Hopefully Alesha having gone through the whole SCD experience, will at the very least be able to tell when a performance is artistically good or not and whether it had easy or hard choreography having trained almost daily for months on end. Will she be able to comment on heel leads etc,? No, but someone else will i.e. Len.
BuddyBontheNet is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 20:18
BuddyBontheNet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Away with the faries
Posts: 27,378
I don't think Alesha does know the basics of ballroom. She knows how to perform the routines Matt choreographed and taught her. That doesn't come close to knowing the basics of an individual dance. If someone told her to dance a basic cha cha she would not know what to do, other than try and fit her "Crazy in Love" routine to whatever music was played.

I'm not having a go at Alesha- this is true of all Strictly contestants. Given that this has apparently been done quite secretly, it's not impossible that the pros have already signed up without knowing anything about the Alesha situation.

If it was me I would be offended if someone with very little basic knowledge started criticising someone I had spent a long week teaching. As far as I can see, even if she directs all her remarks to the dancing of the celebrity, those remarks are still directed at the work of the pros- their abilities to teach, choreogaph and help their celebs as much as possible. To hear the celebs criticised without any knowledge to back it up would be pretty galling.
You may well be right. We'll have to wait and see.
BuddyBontheNet is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 20:23
Psychosis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,224
I don't think Alesha does know the basics of ballroom. She knows how to perform the routines Matt choreographed and taught her. That doesn't come close to knowing the basics of an individual dance. If someone told her to dance a basic cha cha she would not know what to do, other than try and fit her "Crazy in Love" routine to whatever music was played.
While I agree with you for the most part, I'm not sure that this is entirely true. Every time Alesha forgot parts of her dance (which if I recall happened in the Foxtrot, Waltz and Paso Doble) she managed to make it up, with varying degrees of success. That shows Matthew did teach her the basics. I daresay she doesn't know a huge amount though and certainly not for all dances.
Psychosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 20:55
glitzy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 506
As a ballroom dancing teacher myself I know there's no way Alesha could have possibly gained enough knowledge on the show to be able to judge it. I do feel bad for her in a way because she was probably honoured to be asked and didn't realise what the public reaction would be. I feel the BBC have made a big mistake here though, they are giving out the message that a few months lessons qualifies you as a judge and are ignoring the years of training that pro-dancers go through, most of them since childhood. I don't know why the BBC felt the needed to bring in a celebrity judge, surely Karen or Camilla are well known enough now, and I doubt Alesha's appointment will be enough to bring in new viewers anyway. The pro-dancers will probably be publically supportive of Alesha because its in their contract, but I'm sure privately most of them are fuming about this. I know I would find it very difficult to listen to someone with a few months experience judging what I had taught a pupil. If one of the pro's decide to answer back and question Alesha's judgement I think we could be in for uncomfortable viewing.
glitzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 21:03
LaurieMarlow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,894
Being in a girl band was not dance training. I've seen Mis Teeq live numerous times and they did not dance. They just bounced around a bit.

Ruthie is actually a trained dancer. She went to school and college and trained for it.
Alesha trained at something called Dance attic.

They're both primarily singers who do some dancing on the side. You say the name Ruthie Henshall to most people and they'll tell you she's a singer. That's what she's famous for.
LaurieMarlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 22:29
mintchocchip
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,555
Me too I've loved this show since the start but now I'm not even looking forward to the new season starting

If that Mirror article is correct I don't think it's just the Pro Dancers who are going to be up in arms about her. What exactly has Alesha done to deserve 100k? MORE THAN THE OTHER JUDGES! They were told to take a pay DEcrease, no wonder! To pay for Alesha who IMO is not worth a tenth of it

And it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest that no one at the BBC had the guts to tell Arlene to her face, the cowards!! How exactly WOULD they explain to her that she was getting replaced by a younger, glamour girl who has hardly any knowledge of dance?

This has definitely taken the shine off the show for me
Er.....is this 100k per episode or 100k for the entire series?

I hope its the former but some has told me its the latter

I just think the BBc's attitude towards the pros stinks, whether they benefit from publicity or not.
mintchocchip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 22:29
mintchocchip
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,555
Alesha trained at something called Dance attic.

They're both primarily singers who do some dancing on the side. You say the name Ruthie Henshall to most people and they'll tell you she's a singer. That's what she's famous for.
I think of her as a musical actress.
mintchocchip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 22:39
LaurieMarlow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,894
I think of her as a musical actress.
Yeah, fair enough.
LaurieMarlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 23:01
Fairygirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,761
While I agree with you for the most part, I'm not sure that this is entirely true. Every time Alesha forgot parts of her dance (which if I recall happened in the Foxtrot, Waltz and Paso Doble) she managed to make it up, with varying degrees of success. That shows Matthew did teach her the basics. I daresay she doesn't know a huge amount though and certainly not for all dances.
I'm being picky i know but here goes

MC admitted on ITT that it was he who forgot a step in the Foxtrot which caused M&A to improvise for maybe 15-20 secs of the dance........the mistake in the Paso was his to call as well from what i remember.

So Alesha knew enough/had enough presence of mind to improvise in both dances and produce a good routine (esp the Foxtrot)........so it wasn't always sort of dancing by numbers,a compliment to MC's thorough teaching.

I don't recall them going wrong in the Waltz ??
Fairygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2009, 01:26
Spinaker5
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,143
Ruthie does know about performing though i.e. the artistic side of things.

I don't agree that Arlene, Craig and Bruno are only there to judge on the performance. I think that is simplifying things a bit too much and that they are all well qualified to judge dancing in general as basic technique is important. Len is the only one qualified to judge ballroom/Latin dancing.

Hopefully Alesha having gone through the whole SCD experience, will at the very least be able to tell when a performance is artistically good or not and whether it had easy or hard choreography having trained almost daily for months on end. Will she be able to comment on heel leads etc,? No, but someone else will i.e. Len.
I was opposed to Ruthie Henshall (no objection to her personally)joining the judging panel of DOI on the grounds that she isn't a skater and they judge ice dancing.

Craig has demonstrated on ITTthat he does know something about ballroom dancing whereas Bruno is good for little more than comedy value and his scoring is erratic.

Whilst I agree with you about what Alesha will have learned from dancing with Matthew, her inclusion doesn't correct but accentuates the bias that already exists in the judging panel.

This is a blatant attempt to rival X-Factor and will not go down well with the section of the viewers, like myself, who do not watch that show. I'll give it a go, but I could well stop watching.
Spinaker5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2009, 07:33
katie_p
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,715

Craig has demonstrated on ITTthat he does know something about ballroom dancing whereas Bruno is good for little more than comedy value and his scoring is erratic.

Whilst I agree with you about what Alesha will have learned from dancing with Matthew, her inclusion doesn't correct but accentuates the bias that already exists in the judging panel.
In actual fact what Craig said on ITT was written for him by a professional dancer (not one of the Strictly pros). Whether this was because he couldn't be bothered to do it himself or because he didn't know enough to do it well, who can say?

I agree about Bruno, I would have got rid of him before Arlene (although I can't say I'm sad Arlene has gone, just that her replacement is so unsuitable).
katie_p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2009, 07:59
smelly jem
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,725
I should imagine the dancers are unhappy as are the other judges.

This situation smells just the Kelly Brook one on BGT. Alesha only lasts a week , Arlene comes back and Strictly has loads of publicity into the bargain.
I don't like any of it , I feel sorry for Arlene and Alesha.
smelly jem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2009, 08:04
dome
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 52,176
Strictly dancers furious at appointment of 'gimmick' judge Alesha Dixon

Strictly Come Dancing stars have branded the decision to appoint singer Alesha Dixon as a judge little more than a 'gimmick'.

Many of the show's professional dancers are furious that 66-year-old choreographer Arlene Phillips is being replaced by an amateur.
dome is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:40.