• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
How do you think the pros regard Alesha's appointment
<<
<
7 of 7
>>
>
footygirl
15-07-2009
Originally Posted by Miah:
“I agree. Otherwise you may as well bring back It's A Knockout and have Brendan and Vincent wearing roller skates and a diver's suit, balancing leaky buckets of water on their head whilst trying to walk over a greasy log...”

That sounds lile It's A Knockout
Miah
15-07-2009
Originally Posted by footygirl:
“That sounds lile It's A Knockout”

It was supposed to.
carol north
15-07-2009
Originally Posted by katie_p:
“Another aspect to this I hadn't really considered is that someone who has received three months' training from a pro, is now being a given a salary more than three times what that professional earns. That is just beyond insulting.”

Totally agree with that. I still find the whole thing unbelievable and I think it is really going to change SCD from being an exciting competion to an entertainment show I for one cannot view it in the same light.
katmobile
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by Spinaker5:
“At least Arlene wasn't jetting to and fro across the Atlantic each week!

There are beautiful women amongst the contestants and pro dancers. I think the BBC has done this to be controversial and it's worked. The next step will be Brendan telling Alesha she doesn't know what she's talking about.”

For example Camelia's not exactly ugly is she? I think the real issue is not that Arlene's being replaced but that she's being replaced with someone who knows a lot less. I like Alesha but I think this is wrong and she'd have done better not to have accepted the beeb.
katmobile
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“I actually starting to hope this is a "disaaaaaaster". JUst to stop the Beeb making stupid changes (ie bringing in the dance off!)”

However hated the dance-off is I believe it was brought in to stop travesties like Spoony being voted off before Jan and Georgina who were both hopeless that week (or at least that's why I originally supported it - it may have been an attempt to keep the likes of Emma in the competition which a lot of people have suspected vis a vis Lisa last year which was a bad idea). Unlike the dance-off this is a step too far the other way - the lady behind seems to be of the opinion Strictly is an entertainment show solely which is ignoring the fact that the dance element is also important.
footygirl
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by katmobile:
“However hated the dance-off is I believe it was brought in to stop travesties like Spoony being voted off before Jan and Georgina who were both hopeless that week (or at least that's why I originally supported it - it may have been an attempt to keep the likes of Emma in the competition which a lot of people have suspected vis a vis Lisa last year which was a bad idea). Unlike the dance-off this is a step too far the other way - the lady behind seems to be of the opinion Strictly is an entertainment show solely which is ignoring the fact that the dance element is also important.”



She might like to study the title of the programme- which I believe is still Strictly Come Dancing

Bear with Jay Hunt though- she might be struggling to define the word dancing- so it will take her time to find it in the dictionary
StrictlyRed
16-07-2009
yep, the title does rather give it away, doesn't it!
footygirl
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by StrictlyRed:
“yep, the title does rather give it away, doesn't it!”

To those who can read-and have a modicum of intelligence
memmh
16-07-2009
Perhaps one of the changes will be a rebranding to Strictly Come Entertainment.
footygirl
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by memmh:
“Perhaps one of the changes will be a rebranding to Strictly Come Entertainment.”

Don't give the idiot any ideas- after her recent effots- shudders
memmh
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by footygirl:
“Don't give the idiot any ideas- after her recent effots- shudders”

Sorry
footygirl
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by memmh:
“Sorry ”

Don't worry about it memmh
memmh
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by footygirl:
“Don't worry about it memmh”

'Tis a horrible idea, isn't it?
Helbrown
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by CaroUK:
“I am VERY surprised that Karen wasn't asked to do it.
”

Karen is like Marmite. You either love her or detest her with a passion. I am of the latter disposition and am seriously hoping for another dud partner this year. Trouble is you see more of her on ITT then.
footygirl
16-07-2009
I love Karen- she is so bubbly and effervescent- and what a dancer she is

I hope she gets a good partner
SideshowStu
16-07-2009
'Strictly Come Entertainment' is far too stuffy a title to bring in 'da yoof'. I think something like...

'Hit the floor...er, bitch!' would be much better, innit?
footygirl
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by SideshowStu:
“'Strictly Come Entertainment' is far too stuffy a title to bring in 'da yoof'. I think something like...

Hit the floor...er, bitch!' would be much better, innit? ”

Too many words there Stu

Strictly no OAPS
SCD
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by katie_p:
“Another aspect to this I hadn't really considered is that someone who has received three months' training from a pro, is now being a given a salary more than three times what that professional earns. That is just beyond insulting.”

How do you know what salary Alesha will receive - It's all hearsay that is written in the tabloids which is mainly made up rubbish.

I hope Alesha does a fantastic job and has people eating their words.
katie_p
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by SCD:
“How do you know what salary Alesha will receive - It's all hearsay that is written in the tabloids which is mainly made up rubbish.

I hope Alesha does a fantastic job and has people eating their words.”

The tabloids are often fairly accurate about stories on Strictly actually. After all they broke the story on Alesha coming in to be a judge long before the press release.

Realistically Alesha has not got a chance of doing a fantastic job because she doesn't have the right knowledge to be a judge. The best she can hope for is not to show herself up, in which case she will be restricting herself to comments on effort and performance which are totally unnecessary to anyone who is actually watching along.
SideshowStu
16-07-2009
Well let's hope it's all heresay then... I daresay we'll hear something more definite at some point soon
BuddyBontheNet
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by StrictlyRed:
“yep, the title does rather give it away, doesn't it!”

Kind of!

I love Karen and hope she gets a good partner this year and when she does stop dancing on SCD I hope she is appointed as a judge - preferably replacing Bruno but as well as if that's not possible.
soulmate61
16-07-2009
Originally Posted by SideshowStu:
“'Strictly Come Entertainment' is far too stuffy a title to bring in 'da yoof'. I think something like...
”

Cool on the floor, man
Miah
17-07-2009
Originally Posted by Helbrown:
“Karen is like Marmite. You either love her or detest her with a passion. I am of the latter disposition and am seriously hoping for another dud partner this year. Trouble is you see more of her on ITT then. ”

And you used to be such a fan back in the day!

Am tempted to hope she eventually becomes a judge just to stir things up a little with those who claim to dislike her!
katie_p
21-07-2009
According to this week's Woman's Own magazine:

Quote:
“"It's caused a few rumbles with the pro dancers", an insider at the BBC reveals. "They're obviously not happy that they, as professionals, will be judged by someone with minimal dance training and no qualifications in the field."

One pro dancer, who asked not to be named, tells Woman's Own, "Alesha is a great girl but at the end of the day, she doesn't have the experience to comment on dance technique like Arlene."”

<<
<
7 of 7
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map