Originally Posted by stcoop:
“One of the questions she asked Tennant when trying to work out were he was in his timeline was "Crash of the Byzantium, have we done that yet?"
So not only does that prove she is playing River Song it also kills the stupid idea that he's somehow a rebooted first Doctor.”
Originally Posted by Corwin:
“I'm guessing the hand cuffs she has are the same pair she has in the Library as well.
Seems I was wrong with my speculation on the questioning scene in SitL as I always presumed she asked those questions as they were encounters she had with #10 yet here we see one of them at least is with #11.”
Originally Posted by
stcoop:
“I suspect that'll be one of the things we sweep under the carpet and don't think about too much.
”
Originally Posted by The 3 Doctors:
“There is no doubt you are correct, its definitely River Song and its not a reboot. But I wonder why she asked DT Doctor "Crash of the Byzantium, have we done that yet?" because surely she would have remembered he was no longer that incarnation of the Doctor at the time of the Crash of the Byzantium?
I guess the real answer is SM planned this to be a DT story before he announced he was leaving.
The fan answer would have to be something along the lines of they have done so much together and its the person he is inside she loves, its not to do with his looks so all the adventures they have had together get a little blurred. How's that for an answer to my own question?”
Originally Posted by
JessicaL:
“But it makes no sense -Smith is not a romantic match to Alex at all
If it was a story for a Tennant Doctor changed because he announced he was leaving they just simply would have recast River to a more suitable match if the stories were romantic ..
Nah can't believe it's a romantic scenario -don't know whats going on but they are so not a romantic match ..
It's all to be revealed in the specials I think -what I don't know though
.”
For all those comments above I believe that this post by Davros's Chair is a great answer and the one I go with....
Originally Posted by davros's chair:
“Maybe she doesn't know what order his regenerations come in. If she knows several incarnations she may not know how they go chronologically.”
For me, I've always seen that moment when she looks at the Doctor in the library, as her looking into his eyes....and not really his face, and even if she has met the Tenth Doctor again....a time for the Doctor after the library events....but before for River....she definitely has met more than one incarnation.....but
no incarnation before Ten, just after Ten......I say this because she knows of regeneration, which the Doctor only ever shouts about if he is about to regenerate, or meets a companion who has seen him in a different guise.....
The events of the Byzantium crash, could have happend at any point of all those times that she has met the Doctor....
Like I said on another thread...if the Doctor sees her on Monday and takes her to the moon landing, drops her home, she writes that in the diary, then the Doctor comes that very week again on a friday, and takes her to the museum....then next monday, the Doctor who visits her is the one who hasn't in his time line taken her out yet to the moon landing or the museum....so she would work out from that he is an earlier version to the Doctor who took her out last week...
That is why she was asking the Doctor, the events that she had already done, but which version of the Doctor it was that had come to the library.....one before the Byzantium crash, or the one after....nothing to do with whether it was ten or eleven....for her it was the Doctor.....who obviously visisted her at randoms times of her life.....just like the the Time Travellers wife....