Did anybody get the impression that they were running a bit short on ideas for BB4? Ok, so there was the exchange etc etc.. but a lot of people say it was boring. thing become boring when they are always the same...

So, with this in mind, what's your ideas for BB5?

BB is supposed to be about "back to basics". What about they start with a really High tech house, every possible gadget known to man (inc a washing machine.. if I see any more grotty under garments being washed I'll chuck!). Then, each week, they take some stuff away, making things hard each week. Could even do it the other way, start off really really basic and the more tasks they complete the more gadgets they can have.

How about, each week, they vote who to evict. The 3 with the highest number of votes are up. Then they link up to another BB house in another country. The housemates from the other house decide which one to save after being shown the 3 nominees worst moments.

What are your ideas, the stranger the better. You never know who reads these post after all!!

when does bb5 start do you know?

erm, maybe they cud choose 3 ppl 4 eviction, n da hm's vote on who 2 save frm eviction, leavin 2 ppl 2 face da public vote, as this happens the 3 ppl r lockd in sum eviction room n at da end of eviction show da 2ppl saved re-enter da house!!!
Also, why duz da saturday challenge hav 2 hav a "nice" room or gift, wot if the loser gets put in a secret room full of his/hers worst nitemarish phobia!!

I agree with a post I read on these boards a few days ago that Big Brother should re-emphasize the importance of what it is to be in Big Brother. I.E. It should be about surviving Nominations/Evictions from a week to week basis. I am in strong opinion after reading this point made by a poster that there should no longer be any "week off" from nomination for any of the housemates (can't remember what the proper word is ).

Also BB should get tough on nomination reasons. If any housemates give crap reasons (i.e. Nush, Gos) then their nominations are played back to the group, and the group are allowed to change their nominations after watching this, if they wish to. Theirs always a lot of debate as to whether housemates should be allowed to discuss nominations. I think they should be able to, but only to the opposite sex!

wot if any housemate gives a invalid nomination, they pay da price by bein put up 4 eviction!!!

I think they should reverse the eviction process. the public vote who is to be nominated and from the 2 or 3 with highest vote, the housmates chose who is to be evicted.

The gadgets idea is a good idea, start of with a space age house and each week take away a gadget or gamble it in the weekly challenge.

Also the each housemate should be given a seperate top secret mission each week and if they complete it they get a prize (cash prize at end of game or food or something) for example they have to get 2 other housemates to argue about a particular subject (cheese for example)

Wow...Lee!! Great minds think alike.

I suggested the same on another forum the other day. If the public can vote for ALL housemates, then surely the revenue from phonecalls will increase.

It will also stop the 'fixing' allegations that hear every year.

They so should be up themselves (for eviction!) if they give silly reasons like pee on the seat. How she - I mean they - let them get away with reasons like that made mine boil.

but if all housemates r put up 4 eviction EVRI week it will kill the moment of bein told whos up 4 eviction....
I reckon they shud b told they r up 4 eviction on the eviction nite, keep em guess till its too late....