Originally Posted by yelsel:
“yet another piece of sensationalism byThe Sun, of course we all realise that you must believe everything you read in the sun, there is not a chance in hell of Arlene being brought back , and there is no chance of them dropping Alesha as she has a contract.
with regard to the accusations of ageism, what are tv companies supposed to do with female presenters, should they keep them on screen till the pop their clogs, or let them retire like most 65 year olds. Personally i'd rather not have to suffer another season of Arlenes bad alliterations, perving over the men and silly hand expressions, i for one am glad she has gone as i think, despite her supposed experience ( not ballroom related mind you) she was a complete pain in the ass, put her out to grass i say..... and make way for the younger generation”
so where does that leave the old age male presenters then who are legion?
Len is only a year younger than Arlene, Bruce is way off the planet in terms of age.
The tv screens are full of over the hill men, some of them really dreadful. Some of the older ladies are better presenters than their male counterparts.
If anyone is to be put out to grass then be fair about it and get rid of the male pains in the ass as well.
I am not a fan of Arlene but then I am not a fan of Alesha either. The BBC has handled the whole thing badly. One report says 5 judges would mean changing the whole show, which seems like a fabrication. One extra set of paddles, a bigger table and an extra chair and no chance of having to have a casting vote from Len.