Originally Posted by makesat:
“Why is it that it is not possible for a storyline of two young people battling and becoming triumphant against all the odds when they
1) take on
2) turn around and then
3) make a ""joint"" success of the Farm that has proved so difficult for all the previous occupants.
Who knows they may even become the Nouveau Riche of the Village in years to come. There could be storylines building over the sale of land mentioned by Andy a couple of weeks ago.
Why does it have to be that fast and loose always wins? Why is it that the "exciting but irresponsible ones" the ones (who ALWAYS leave a trail of broken dreams behind them) are to be shown as the acceptable option. Where have hopes, dreams and aspirations gone. The girl should pay her penance, realise what an absolute fool, liar, untrustworthy friend she has made of herself and return to Andy hoping that THE ONE WHO LOVED HER UNCONDITIONALLY will have her back. The one problem would be whether or not the probable lack of an unconditional now would affect there previously good long term relationship.”
It's not a question of anything being acceptable or anybody winning though is it? It's a soap, if it's 'justice' you're after, doesn't everyone get their comuppence in one way or another? Anybody with an ounce of sense or decency knows that the affair is wrong but in the same vein I'm sure people realise that these things happen. People fall out of love, people fall in lust, people have affairs, people fall in love with other people. That's just a fact of life. If Katie doesn't love Andy anymore then why on earth should she go back to him? It's been made pretty clear that his hopes and dreams are not hers, she doesn't share his vision of their future. She probably never did.
And let's face it, how interesting would it have been to see Andy/Katie make a go of it at the farm? I agree with
En Ami , the Andy/Katie thing had reached a stalemate. I certainly didn't find their endless conversations about the 'lambing' interesting. A reflection of real life farming it may have been but as tv entertainment it was as dull as dishwater. With other characters, I find myself rooting for that, take Laurel and Ashley for example. That against-all-odds mentality works for them as a pairing. But Andy and Katie? I've always thought they were mis-matched from the very beginning and again, I agree with
En Ami with regards to the point that Robert/Katie has the potential to be more interesting. I for one remember a few years ago there was a hint of things to come between Andy, Katie and Robert just before the hit and run incident. There was definite sparks between Katie and Robert even then. Whether they last or not isn't the issue for me. I've just enjoyed the coming together of this plotline and the fall-out to come.