Originally Posted by rd3000:
“My message was, either be patient or, get out now and buy in to a product three times as expensive.”
Well, it's really not your place to tell people how to react to faulty goods.
Quote:
“Humax's efforts in producing a remedy are not accelerated by the weight of complaints on this forum.”
On the other hand they are not decelerated either.
Quote:
“What does get up my nose are those posts which only complain and offer no solution. Those posts that denegrate a system of work or an organisation's ethos when the author has no idea how or why a company does what it does.”
That really is the most intellectually bankrupt position.
According to that philosophy one cannot ever make a criticism unless one has almost complete knowledge about that which one criticises.
People bought a product that they expected to work to a certain standard from Humax. In many cases one of the reasons they were prepared to buy an untested product was because Humax had a reputation as a company that produced premium products, charged a premium price, and had premium customer support, including timely fixes to bugs that occurred.
They have not only failed to live up to their reputation but they have failed to even properly communicate what they were doing. They allowed us to expect some fixes within a few months and even told us that they were going to release the bug fixes before adding major extras.
Now we find that they still haven't a clue when they are going to give us the fixes but are waiting until they have made at least one major addition.
If you think that behaviour is acceptable, that's fine and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion.
What is not acceptable is for you to tell other people that they are not just as entitled to a different one.