Originally Posted by philadelphia:
“Completely agree that it has lost its sparkle. Too many dancers and 'celebs' that I have barely heard of. Usual lousy camera angles. Too much waffle and not enough dancing.
It looks tired now - typical BBC to hammer a success story to death!”
Aw, c'mon - let's be real, for a moment, shall we?
How many people really knew who Alesha, Jill, Mark, Darren, Gethin, Matt or Austin were before they appeared on Strictly? They became popular
because of what we learned about them while they were on the show - not because of who they were before.
The whole point of the show is that we, as the audience, get to know the celebs. If we know them all inside out before they've even set foot on the dancefloor, what's the point of watching?
There were some truly appalling names being bandied around before SCD7 started: Geri Halliwell (



), Sharon Osborne (

), Johnny Vegas (


) ... I, for one, am over the moon none of those horrors are on the show.
There was no less dancing than usual, and no more waffle (if anything, less, I'd say). If you don't like it, please feel free to turn over.
My only gripe from the first batch is that it appears a little short on characters - so many of them were petrified that it was hard to get a handle on who they are ... but hopefully that will emerge in the weeks ahead.