• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Len is an IDIOT!!
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
jill1812
19-09-2009
Originally Posted by HollyC:
“Or why not 3 judges, like (I think) they have in DWTS??

Actually, I agree in part with the OP - I do think Len is an idiot and very annoying (strangely, because for the first couple of series, he was my favourite judge!), just not specifically for anything he has done this evening.

My preferred judging panel would be:
Craig (although I do think he is going overboard a bit calling everyone darling!)
Anton (or Bruno if Anton wants to continue to be a contestant)
Arlene or Karen Hardy (I love Alesha, but would prefer a professional to be a judge!)”

If any judge has to go please let it be Craig. He's vile, but unlike Simon Cowell or Jason Gardiner he has no wit, frankly he's D.U.L.L. Dull

I think Bruno should go or be nailed to his seat and given ritalin before every show.

Len was right tonight. He chose the best in the dance off. Nothing to do with wanting to keep a BBC man, or not liking a certain pro.
rickster1995
19-09-2009
rav, lynda, ricky were all worse than her
ESPIONdansant
19-09-2009
Hey, that's the way it goes. Joe is popular. So is Linda (Lynda??).

Rav is a BBC guy. Martina? Not indispensable.

Please don't confuse this with a straight-up-and-down dance competition. We've been there before. It's all political.

Week 1: already we have a bit of a "controversy" - good for the tabloids, good for the ratings.
justpootling
19-09-2009
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“It's a gift.


I did.

It was xenophobic, un-sourced, irrelevant and unconvincing. Basically you simply parrotted a series of guesses, unrelated incidents, and your own prejudices, and you then presented them as indisputable facts proving a vast conspiracy.

If you actually had any evidence, I'd have bothered responding to it.”

Xenophobic? How so? Do you even know what the word means?

My prejudices? How so? What personal prejudices did I state in my post?
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map