DS Forums

 
 

1st October - Still no (meaningful) firmware update!!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-10-2009, 23:38
richard_g_uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cradley, Halesowen, W.Mids
Posts: 1,047
The polarisation of opinion here does surprise me. I suppose some people are never satisfied.

I got mine early on (Christmas Eve 2008 when it arrived!), and I have generally been satisfied with its performance. I've had several lockups, which is highly irritating, and several no-records or faulty records (Film4 was bad for this for a while). Like any bit of tech kit, I've got used to its UI quirks, and I've also successfully upgraded it with a 1TB disk (WD10EVDS). On balance it has met my requirements and I'm very satisfied. If the forthcoming software update eliminates the lockups then I shall be a very happy bunny.
As the main purpose of a PVR is to record programs how can you be "very satisfied" if you suffer from missed/faulty recordings. It quite clearly isn't meeting its main requirement.

Just out of interest, since upgrading the hard disk have the occurrences of the lock-ups, no records or faulty records reduced, increased or disappeared completely.
richard_g_uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 11-10-2009, 08:59
JohnON
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wirral, UK
Posts: 195
And prices would go up 30% and no manufacturer would release a leading edge product onto the UK market first.

You knew it was leading edge tech, you should expect glitches.
But it's not leading edge technology. Sky digital has been out for years and even the FoxSat has been out for over 12 months. Sheesh, all their effort is going into the next box and they haven't even got this one right yet.

Last night: Box froze while watching the snooker. Scrambled round the back to power down and reboot. 30 minutes later, was unable to watch one channel while I was recording on another. Another scramble round the back and "destroyed" what I was recording.

Got up this morning to a blaze of blue light. Despite having it set to go to standby at 23:59, it failed to do so - twice in as many days.

It's so reminiscent of the original NTL cable boxes, it's unreal.

Digital TV reception has been around for years and years - it's no longer "leading edge" - it's old hat and it's garbage!

John.
JohnON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 09:26
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
And prices would go up 30% and no manufacturer would release a leading edge product onto the UK market first.
This is true. It would be absurd to return the box because of some of the smaller bugs. If everyone did it there would be stagnation as companies would barely dare to innovate.

You knew it was leading edge tech, you should expect glitches.
But the glitches are not in anything that could be vaguely considered leading edge. All the UI nonsense is down to nothing more than incompetent design or cack-handed implementation.

The HD decoding and display works faultlessly. (At least, it does for me).
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 09:51
swedish cook
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 821
...
Last night: Box froze while watching the snooker. Scrambled round the back to power down and reboot. 30 minutes later, was unable to watch one channel while I was recording on another. Another scramble round the back and "destroyed" what I was recording.
...
You either have signal problems or a duff box (or both), do not think that other people are having the same experience as you, they aren't. I've had two HDRs, the first occasionally failed to boot in the morning and needed power reset, so I returned it, its replacement has been with us for 4 months and has been completely reliable.

Obviously signal problems should not cause a lockup, there is a chance that there is a bug which is signal related though - hence why I mention signal.

Check signal and get your HDR replaced.
swedish cook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 10:08
Automan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 4,952
No your statement is totally incorrect.
I did not say I rang about the deletion issue. I just stated I was unhappy with the deletion issue.
Okay.
But the manual does not tell the users about the limitations on delete and their only solution for the last ten months was to bodge the software by limiting when you can delete.

Your call, and maybe others may not have been needed if they had done their job properly or put an update in the user manual.

The user manual also forgets to mention user that the recording thumbnails images are only generated at 03:00 if the box is not recording anything at that time and is in standby - else no thumbnail images.

Again if Humax had tried a little harder and the unit was in standby when it makes a recording, it could then have generated the thumbnail images when recording ends.

Automan.
Automan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 10:25
SWIZZ?
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambs
Posts: 874
A number of posters have decried Humax's intention to produce a "New HDR Mark 2", before they sort out the present box.

There is another viewpoint.
Any new box is likely to rest on the featuresof the current HDR but with extra functionality. So the existing chunks of software that do work will be used again whilst parts that are in need of improvement, in the present box, will be improved ready for the new box.
Such improvements should eventually benefit the owners of the current HDR.

Dare I suggest that we remain patient?

David
SWIZZ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 10:31
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
A number of posters have decried Humax's intention to produce a "New HDR Mark 2", before they sort out the present box.

There is another viewpoint.
Any new box is likely to rest on the featuresof the current HDR but with extra functionality. So the existing chunks of software that do work will be used again whilst parts that are in need of improvement, in the present box, will be improved ready for the new box.
I think the worry is that Humax will make a half hearted attempt to sort out the problems with the current box and then just forget it.

Whether that concern is well founded we won't really know until we see what happens.

Dare I suggest that we remain patient?
As opposed to what?

A lot of us are waiting very patiently but that does not stop us mentioning our concerns about the shoddy way Humax have treated their customers for this box.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 11:01
SWIZZ?
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cambs
Posts: 874
I think the worry is that Humax will make a half hearted attempt to sort out the problems with the current box and then just forget it.

Whether that concern is well founded we won't really know until we see what happens.



As opposed to what?

A lot of us are waiting very patiently but that does not stop us mentioning our concerns about the shoddy way Humax have treated their customers for this box.
Not improving the current box sufficiently would reduce confidence in the new box, & deter buyers.

Not an award-winning sales strategy !!

& as I said, improvements in the HDR software, to use in the new box are likely to benifit existing HDRs.

David
SWIZZ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 11:54
JohnON
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wirral, UK
Posts: 195
Dare I suggest that we remain patient?

David
I'm one of the original Betamax men so I was always at the front of the queue with leading edge stuff. Now Betamax may have got pushed out through marketing strategies but, technically, it wasn't released onto the market until it was ready.

Once I no longer had money to waste, I learned to wait - I learned to remain patient, as you put it. So I waited over 12 months after the FoxSat was released. With all of their previous experience with Freeview to build on, 12 months should surely be long enough - Humax are so confident they're already working on Mark II.

Mark I will remain full of bugs so can I be assured that, if I wait for 12 months after the release of Mark II, then Mark II will be bug free? yeah, and pigs might!



John.
JohnON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 12:36
Automan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 4,952
You could have a new son or daughter in the time we have all been waiting - or twins

Automan.
Automan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 13:16
scarlet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
You could have a new son or daughter in the time we have all been waiting
And the HDR will probably continue to require the same amount of babysitting...
scarlet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 13:30
Widget76
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 427
Yea, they probably could, but those details would come out in a future update
Widget76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 14:36
richard_g_uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cradley, Halesowen, W.Mids
Posts: 1,047
As Sagem have released (or are close to releasing) a Freesat PVR with iPlayer facilities if I was the Humax marketing department I would want to get the latest HDR firmware (with the iPlayer update) into the HDR stock that is being sent to the shops.

I can see some sales assistants demoing the two boxes and saying the Sagem box is the same as the Humax but the Sagem is bettter as it has iPlayer facilities as well.
richard_g_uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 15:18
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
I can see some sales assistants demoing the two boxes and saying the Sagem box is the same as the Humax but the Sagem is bettter as it has iPlayer facilities as well.
If Humax don't fix the bug/niggle list very soon it will be a gift to competing manufacturers.

I can just hear the sales assistants: "Well, the Humax is OK so long as you never go on holiday".
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 15:44
barkbarkman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
If Humax don't fix the bug/niggle list very soon it will be a gift to competing manufacturers.

I can just hear the sales assistants: "Well, the Humax is OK so long as you never go on holiday".
Not had a power failure in over 12 months so this would not affect everyone.
Have been away on 3 occasions this year for more than 2 weeks at a time and everything has recorded.
barkbarkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 16:26
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,289
I had one for about 30 min last week. The foxsat happened to be on at the time so it did not matter.
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 16:30
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
Not had a power failure in over 12 months so this would not affect everyone.
Of course it won't affect everyone - but you won't know until it happens.

I haven't had a power cut in years but I'm afraid that's little comfort to the people who have had them and have lost recordings.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 17:53
Andrue
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brackley, UK
Posts: 16,657
I think the worry is that Humax will make a half hearted attempt to sort out the problems with the current box and then just forget it.

Whether that concern is well founded we won't really know until we see what happens.
Or you could look at their track record for other upgradeable kit they have sold. It doesn't encourage optimism
Andrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 18:02
barkbarkman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Or you could look at their track record for other upgradeable kit they have sold. It doesn't encourage optimism
Should we then list the manufacturers of Freeview (and freesat equipment that have offered updates?
If I recall Humax were one of the very few manufactrers that offered an update for Freeview+ / playback; whereas other manufacturers released new boxes.
I am confident that an update for the HDR will come up and improve an already great piece of kit.
barkbarkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 18:39
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
I am confident that an update for the HDR will come up and improve an already great piece of kit.
Provided they fix the vast majority of the bugs and have not just concentrated on the iplayer I think most people will be happy.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 19:36
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,289
Provided they fix the vast majority of the bugs and have not just concentrated on the iplayer I think most people will be happy.
Seconded . Most of them are pretty minor to me but I guess thats's mostly down to how I use the box.
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 20:42
Malomaka
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 72
Provided they fix the vast majority of the bugs and have not just concentrated on the iplayer I think most people will be happy.
I would have been happy if the minor bugs were fixed, I am not in the least bit bothered about iplayer.

If manuafacturer's do release products with minor bugs/niggles, the least they can do is fix them in a reasonable timescale, 11 months is NOT a reasonable.
Malomaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 21:00
jcsager
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 144
As the main purpose of a PVR is to record programs how can you be "very satisfied" if you suffer from missed/faulty recordings. It quite clearly isn't meeting its main requirement.
It would have been great if it missed no recordings, but I suspect that at least some of them were down to broadcaster goofs (Film4 was consistently bad for a while whereas most others were sporadic).

Perhaps I sympathise too much with Humax, having developed software & software-based systems myself professionally, and I understand the real problems in getting a multitasking system with significant real-time constraints to work reliably under all conditions. It's true that some more timely bug-fix updates would have helped both us and Humax's image. However, given what was available, I am satisfied. I was never going to go for Sky+ anyway.

Just out of interest, since upgrading the hard disk have the occurrences of the lock-ups, no records or faulty records reduced, increased or disappeared completely.
It's no better and no worse than it was before, as far as I can see, though the evidence since I upgraded is sparser.
jcsager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 21:48
scarlet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
having developed software & software-based systems myself professionally, and I understand the real problems in getting a multitasking system with significant real-time constraints to work reliably under all conditions.
Same here. Although the two most serious problems - deletion of ITV HD scheduled recordings and failure to recover from power outages - are not a function of it being a multitasking system.

What's more, both could very easily be given at least acceptable workarounds with very minor changes - forcing a power up when supplied with electricity, and optionally defaulting to NOT scan on EPG changes.

The problem is, that there is a lack of evidence that any of the bugs that most people (affected by those bugs) care about are going to be fixed.
scarlet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 08:55
Tern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,324
Perhaps I sympathise too much with Humax, having developed software & software-based systems myself professionally, and I understand the real problems in getting a multitasking system with significant real-time constraints to work reliably under all conditions.
It actually manages most of the real time stuff impressively well. The only exception is the 'delete' problem and that's almost certainly a feature of the Linux file system in use and if the corruption is rare it's very easy to forgive Humax for not finding out about it until it was too late to come up with a good, reliable work around..

It's the various bits of UI cack-handedness that, as an analyst or programmer, you know:

a) Should not have been signed off in the first place.
b) Would only take a few minutes to correct.

that are so annoying.
Tern is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26.