Originally Posted by SCD-Observer:
“I am sorry to disagree with you Sid, but I thoroughly enjoyed their salsa tonight. I thought Ali coped extremely well with an extremely difficult routine. In terms of leaderboard position, I actually think she should either be scored the same as Zoe (who I think was overscored slightly again), or that Zoe should be the same score at 32 with Ali. I don't think Ali should be third but second on the leaderboard.
...”
I want to be clear: I enjoyed their salsa. It was my favourite dance of the night, especially as a dance. I also agree that Ali coped extremely well. I was impressed. And I think that
afterthoughts and
lady latina make some very good points.
However, ... where were the marks to reflect how good it was?
There's nothing wrong with 8s -- until they're compared to the marks some of the other received.
I don't think Ricky W was very impressive tonight, for example, so that the difference between his dancing and his partners was
very noticeable. Yet he still got 4 8s, the same as Ali.
Re Ali vs Zoe, here's a thought experiment: Could Zoe have done Ali's dance that well? I don't think so. Could Ali have done Zoe's? I think yes. I don't think any of the other celebs, 'cept maybe Ricky W, could have done a salsa of that difficulty that well.
Now, maybe Brian's approach is right, and pushing up the difficulty now will pay off later on. But the judges don't reward difficulty (and the things
afterthoughts mentioned) in the way they do "performance", and it's frustrating to see such a good dancer go out with a routine that doesn't seem a good match to what the judges and much of the audience best appreciate.