|
||||||||
Strictly Averages 2008, Ironic. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Strictly Averages 2008, Ironic.
Rachel and Vincent
Average Rank: 1 Place Finished: 2 Total: 573 Number Of Dances: 16 Average: 35.8 Lisa and Brendan Average Rank: 2 Place Finished: 3 Total: 557 Number Of Dances: 16 Average: 34.8 Tom and Camilla Average Rank: 3 Place Finished: 1 Total: 552 Number Of Dances: 16 Average: 34.5 Austin and Erin Average Rank: 3 Place Finished: 4 Total: 414 Number Of Dances: 12 Average: 34.5 So Austin and Tom had the same adverage even though Tom did 4 more dances. Rachel had the highest overall rank followed by Lisa. I would have like to have seen Austin vs Lisa vs Rachel in the final but oh well!
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 446
|
Averages last year meant nothing...highly inflated scores all round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Not always, I would say some of Lisa's dances were overmarked but it was generally okay. I would say Austin and Tom generally were marked befittingly aswell.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 4,492
|
The only dance of Lisa's truely deserving a 10 was her showdance. Biggest laugh of a terrible series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,566
|
last year was better than this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 18,505
|
Oh, get over it now, it's done. Tom won, that's it.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
I agree, I thought last year with all the bad publicity was one of the worst years but I enjoyed it alot more than I have this year. I think anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Away with the faries
Posts: 27,378
|
Quote:
last year was better than this year.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,636
|
In complete agreement BuddyB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11,939
|
In complete disagreement Buddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 5,642
|
Agree with Buddy, but I was happy to see Camilla winning (even if I'm not completely convinced she won with the right partner).
I've got a list of the averages for all seven series - Rachel is 2nd, Lisa is 4th, and Tom and Austin joint fifth. Quite what that says is up to interpretation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: England, UK
Posts: 5,503
|
This series definatly is a step in the right direction, in both SCD and ITT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11,939
|
I think what it says is that none of them were rubbish zankoku87
We can argue about scores and who was better til the cows come home but the actual result doesn't change...and that is decided by the public vote. It might irritate and infuriate at times but 'the public gets what the public wants' as Paul Weller said
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Can somebody explain to me where the irony is?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: digging a tunnel
Posts: 6,434
|
Quote:
Can somebody explain to me where the irony is?
*gets coat*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Quote:
I've got a list of the averages for all seven series - Rachel is 2nd, Lisa is 4th, and Tom and Austin joint fifth. Quite what that says is up to interpretation.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 5,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Oh, that's a shame. But I guess we can't really compare as she did alot fewer dances and they were harsher with scoring.
I'd love to see Alesha, Rachel, Jill, Emma, Louisa, Lisa, Kelly etc and all the great people in one series so 10's would have the same rarity. Can you post a 1 to 10 list? I assume Alesha was number 1
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 5,642
|
Quote:
Oh, that's a shame. But I guess we can't really compare as she did alot fewer dances and they were harsher with scoring.
I'd love to see Alesha, Rachel, Jill, Emma, Louisa, Lisa, Kelly etc and all the great people in one series so 10's would have the same rarity. Can you post a 1 to 10 list? I assume Alesha was number 1 ![]() 2 - Rachel and Vincent 3 - Zoe B and Ian 4 - Lisa and Brendan 5 - Austin and Erin/Tom and Camilla 7 - Emma and Darren 8 - Jill and Darren 9 - Colin and Erin 10 - Mark R and Karen ETA: Ricky W and Natalie currently have an average score 0.5 points less than Mark R and Karen. Next week, they could well make it into the top ten. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Seriously? That's mad!
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 5,642
|
Quote:
Seriously? That's mad!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,224
|
Quote:
So Austin and Tom had the same adverage even though Tom did 4 more dances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,768
|
Austin was robbed - this has been established already
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,875
|
Quote:
So Austin and Tom had the same adverage even though Tom did 4 more dances. Rachel had the highest overall rank followed by Lisa. I would have like to have seen Austin vs Lisa vs Rachel in the final but oh well!
![]() That's the point in averages - add the scores and divide by dances. e.g. 33, 34, 36, 37 added=140 divided by 4 is an average of 35 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 added=175 divided by 5 is still an average of 35. Up until Austin was eliminated, Tom = 1st twice, 2nd 5 times, 3rd twice, 4th once Rachel = 1st 3 times, 2nd 3 times, 3rd once, 4th twice, 5th once Lisa = 1st 3 times, 2nd once, 3rd 3 times, 4th n/a, 5th once, 6th once and 7th once. Austin = 1st 4 times, 2nd twice, 3rd once, 4th twice, 5th n/a, 6th once After Austin's departure, Tom got one more 2nd and one more 3rd Rachel got one more 1st and one more 2nd Lisa got two more 1sts. It all depends on your perspective, Tom was never lower than 3rd except for once when he was 4th, Lisa was as low as 7th one week, Austin 6th and Rachel 5th. Figures can always be manipulated. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Away with the faries
Posts: 27,378
|
Quote:
Agree with Buddy, but I was happy to see Camilla winning (even if I'm not completely convinced she won with the right partner).
I've got a list of the averages for all seven series - Rachel is 2nd, Lisa is 4th, and Tom and Austin joint fifth. Quite what that says is up to interpretation. ![]()
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:01.



