|
||||||||
Cheryl Cole did not pre record hours before |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 629
|
Cheryl Cole did not pre record hours before
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,607
|
Well even if she did sing "Live" there's no denying that the song, the performance, the outfit and most of all her voice was absolute CACK! - I dread to think what her album will be like if that's the best she can do for the lead single.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,200
|
I give up. People just don't listen anyway. You believe she sang live if you want. At least it makes you happy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,059
|
She actually sang half and mimed the other parts (in particular the bridge, and parts of the chorus)
![]() she was really bad tho! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 555
|
IMHO, she sounded 18.74% less live than Alex, but 46.29% more than Whitney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,229
|
Quote:
Well even if she did sing "Live" there's no denying that the song, the performance, the outfit and most of all her voice was absolute CACK! - I dread to think what her album will be like if that's the best she can do for the lead single.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,765
|
Quote:
IMHO, she sounded 18.74% less live than Alex, but 46.29% more than Whitney.
Quote:
Well even if she did sing "Live" there's no denying that the song, the performance, the outfit and most of all her voice was absolute CACK! - I dread to think what her album will be like if that's the best she can do for the lead single.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Walford
Posts: 13,936
|
I'm losing the will to live.
Yeah, i thought it was live as she went to the seat after bla bla. I thought it was a good performance!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,794
|
OK it was "Live" in the sense that she performed at 8.30 and the show went out at 8.30, some of her vocals seemed "as live" and may have been recorded earlier, others, were live as she performed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: At The Griffins
Posts: 31,579
|
some partd were definitely mimed liked the chorus and the bridge
overall though not bad |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,208
|
Oh for the days when singers just SANG!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wigan, Lancashire
Posts: 7,586
|
I hated this song, it was dull and boring I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 317
|
As reported by most of the press today, she sang the first verse then everything else was mimed to a pre recorded vocal track.
It was blatantly obvious as the vocal was not mixed properly with the rest of tr track. It's also the reason she used that huge microphone and held it so close to her face added with the fact that there were absolutely no close ups. Loving the article which shows a picture of the kandy rain singer wearing hhe exact top that cheryl wears!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6,522
|
It's weird how a pre-recorded vocal still sounded flat!
The blatant Janet Jackson 'Rhythm Nation' routine rip-off was OK. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,860
|
It was obvious it was live
She wasn't at her chair, Dermot spoke to her and then Cheryl went and hugged simon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6,522
|
Quote:
It was obvious it was live
She wasn't at her chair, Dermot spoke to her and then Cheryl went and hugged simon. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,771
|
I still don't like the song, but the dancing was good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,765
|
Quote:
No one's questioning that the performance was pre-recorded. I think it's still questionable if her singing was though.
either way, it was cack. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:23.



