Originally Posted by missfrankiecat:
“I kind of take a middle view on Flavia's teaching in all this. From what we see she is patient, kind and knows her stuff. I don't see anything which suggests she doesn't like Craig or has 'given up'. On the other hand I do think her facial expressions and body language are more transparent than many of the other pros - I quite like that about her, she's no bullshitter. So it's pretty obvious she knows when he's danced a stinker and can't believe they're still in it. That seems to be what people are picking up on.
From my limited knowledge base, I am a little critical of her priorities in the early weeks of the competition. It seemed to me that her early choreography - especially that bizarre tango - was far too difficult for Craig and came at the expense of him gaining confidence in basics like posture, which she is now, too late, addressing. But equally his lack of any musicality does make any choreography a nightmare and, of course, we are privy to so little of their training that I would have to admit her choices may have been the best she could do in fairly hopeless circumstances.”
I actually really enjoyed that tango but admit it was far too hard for a first dance. I think the last couple of weeks she has choreographed routines that have been within Craig's 'doability' and really fun and enjoyable to watch, even if they haven't been executed with technical perfection.
To be honest I just don't understand why her teaching is getting questioned when we have had many participants before that have shown little improvement and no one has questioned the pro they were partnered with (okay, bar Anton who seems to get it in the neck a lot). I guess people just come down harder on certain professionals.
I much prefer Flavia's quieter nature to the louder and brasher professionals, she always has a smile on her face too. Anyway I'll be off as I've had enough of being baffled for the day.