• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
The X Factor Equation!!! Measuring the X Factor!! S+E*Sl/I=X!!!
Kablamo
25-10-2009
I just came up with an X Factor equation. If I can just quote myself as I measured John and Edward against Rachel Adedeje!!

Here it is. Prepare to be astounded and in awe of my Einstein brilliance.

Finding X!

Originally Posted by Kablamo:
“I'd disagree completely. I would say it is completely a singing and entertainment competition where they both share the stage.

For example

If the equation is:

(Singing + Entertainment *Sellability/Inability to be liked) * (Individuality + Talent + Hard Work) = X Factor

(S+E*Sl/I)*(I+T+H)=X

Where the variables are rated on a scale of 10 of subjectivity (probable objectivity when measured over multiple members of the audiennce) we will get.

Rachel carries a (6+1*2/10)*(1+1+1)=4.2

John and Edward carry a (2+7*5/5)*(2+2+2)=84

Therefore John and Edward have 20 times more X Factor than Rachel.”

So Lucie would be (9+9*8/1)*(9+9+9)= 3888! Which is 925.71428571428571428571428571429 times more X Factor than Rachel and 46.285714285714285714285714285714 times more than John and Edward!

Equation has been revised...!!
Last edited by Kablamo : 25-10-2009 at 00:32
Snozzcumber
25-10-2009
OMG/WTF * Kablamo = LOL
DollyDumpling
25-10-2009
I couldn't possibly comment on that.
Kablamo
25-10-2009
Originally Posted by DollyDumpling:
“I couldn't possibly comment on that.”

Oh go on. Give it a try. Just putting numbers to letters. Tis all.
xenosys
25-10-2009
Heehee, I just spelled boobies on my calculator.
N X M
25-10-2009
I'd worked out a different equation where Singing is divided by Hard Work plus Individuality plus Tenacity

In which case I've calculated that J&E are S/H+I+T
xenosys
25-10-2009
Originally Posted by N X M:
“I'd worked out a different equation where Singing is divided by Hard Work plus Individuality plus Tenacacity

In which case I've calculated that J&E are S/H+I+T ”

You know that actually works. Ladies & Gents, I think we've found another Einstein here.
Kablamo
25-10-2009
Originally Posted by N X M:
“I'd worked out a different equation where Singing is divided by Hard Work plus Individuality plus Tenacacity

In which case I've calculated that J&E are S/H+I+T ”

I must question your use of the divisible S over the H.

For example if Lucie has the S equatable to 10 and the H equatable 10 then this will give a sub summation of 1 while, if John and Edward had an S equatable to and the H equatable to 1 then they will have a summation of 10...

Therefore this can be revised to my equation using the variables of I, T and H

(S+E*Sl/I)*(I+T+H)=X!!!
Kablamo
25-10-2009
Originally Posted by xenosys:
“You know that actually works. Ladies & Gents, I think we've found another Einstein here.”

I just had enough time to merge the equations and create a new more powerful, more intensely mind blowing equation.

I will go write my paper for publication in the Journal for Funky Mathematics.
xenosys
25-10-2009
I wait with baited breath.
Kablamo
25-10-2009
Originally Posted by xenosys:
“I wait with baited breath. ”

I'm doing my funky dance yet. I will write it a little later.
River_Tam
25-10-2009
Originally Posted by Kablamo:
“I just came up with an X Factor equation. If I can just quote myself as I measured John and Edward against Rachel Adedeje!!

Here it is. Prepare to be astounded and in awe of my Einstein brilliance.

Finding X!



So Lucie would be (9+9*8/1)*(9+9+9)= 3888! Which is 925.71428571428571428571428571429 times more X Factor than Rachel and 46.285714285714285714285714285714 times more than John and Edward!

Equation has been revised...!!”

Since the original numbers that went into your equation were given to one significant figure I'm not sure you can justify returning a value with about 25 numbers after the decimal point.

Apart from that i'm sure you'll find a journal that will publish your equation.
tomnookwillkilu
25-10-2009
Someone's spent a long week alone.
Kablamo
25-10-2009
Originally Posted by River_Tam:
“Since the original numbers that went into your equation were given to one significant figure I'm not sure you can justify returning a value with about 25 numbers after the decimal point.

Apart from that i'm sure you'll find a journal that will publish your equation.”

I used Microsoft Calculator V 5.1 (build 2600.xpsp_sp3_gdr.090804-1435 : Service Pack 3) to perform this calculation. It is a legitimate scientific return based upon the variables calculated.

I have been in contact with Sage publishing for inclusion into the next edition of the "Journal of way out funky Mathematics".
Kablamo
26-10-2009
Originally Posted by tomnookwillkilu:
“Someone's spent a long week alone.”

Oh God no. This level of mathematicianism is mere boo hocky for me.
David McMahon
26-10-2009
Originally Posted by N X M:
“I'd worked out a different equation where Singing is divided by Hard Work plus Individuality plus Tenacity

In which case I've calculated that J&E are S/H+I+T ”

LOL
Kablamo
26-10-2009
Originally Posted by David McMahon:
“LOL ”

Never underestimate the power of the equation.
Simon Cow
26-10-2009
It a very simple one:

J + E - D = Great Fun!
Kablamo
26-10-2009
Originally Posted by Simon Cow:
“It a very simple one:

J + E - D = Great Fun! ”

Exactly.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map