|
||||||||
Another Undeserved 10, yet this time no outrage on DS forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11,311
|
Quote:
Honestly, I think she'd be able to do a slightly less complicated routine which was still more complex than anything most of the other couples could manage. I do think Ricky and Natalie's latins are almost violently aggressive and harsh, and I think she might be getting slightly carried away with Ricky being such a good student in the same way that Brian was with Ali (though not so markedly, perhaps). I want to see Natalie choreograph something difficult but a little more subtle - I think it'd do wonders for them.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
|
Quote:
Agree with this.
It was almost inevitable Zoe would be top or near top with her routine which, to my untrained eye & with the wardrobe malfunction, went awry and was, therefore, overmarked. Before Ali danced I suspected 10s were on the way (surprised there was only one) because the routine was being tee'd up for 10s. Quote:
We know Ali is a beautifully elegant performer in the ballroom and Brian acknowledged he was going to listen to the criticism and make the routine simpler. This begs the question of whether the professionals should continue to play it safe with choreography and ensure high marks or do they push the envelope for more wow factor?
Yes, but I don't think Brian switched to playing it safe. The choreography was difficult enough before that he could ease off a little while still keeping it interesting.Quote:
Ricky's VW last week seemed to contain complex choreography with more Fleckerls than you could shake a stick at. Ricky's samba routine was a toughie too - Len pointed out that some of the steps required a lot more training than a few days' rehearsal could achieve. Should Natalie be playing it safer or should she push on?
Again I don't think "safe" is the only alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,496
|
For this viewer, it was the only dance - apart from the professionals' jive - wholly worth watching last night - in a class of its own.
I don't know why anyone would expect an uproar because it got a top mark. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: England, UK
Posts: 5,503
|
It was more deserving than Ricky's 10 but still think on a whole it was a bit early and a bit "simple" a routine for a 10.
I know it's never going to happen, but I would like to 10 to regain its "specialness". In series 1-3 both of those routines would have gotten 8/9s. Granted Alesha wasn't there then so her scores can't be compared, but Bruno didn't give out a 10 until the Series 2 final! Now he's giving them out to anything credible past week 5 (with the expection of Kelly which is a whole other story). At least Len's seeing sense still and keeping his 10 under raps. Craig's 10s. As hidden as Craig K's dance ability, hopefully... |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
|
Quote:
Maybe Alesha has been reading all the nasty stuf written about her (and Ricky) after she gave a 10 last week so has decided to be a bit more careful with her 10s now!
Who knows, i do think if she had given out another 10 people would have been moaning that shes giving out too many! Alesha's scoring was criticised, just as all the judges have been at some point in Strictly history. Remember the outrage at Bruno's 10 for Kelly's AS? The problem last week was that fairly minor, but clear, technical issues were spotted in Ricky's VW. I didn't see any obvious flaws in Ali's performance last night and the judges didn't mention any. Therefore, a 10 was justified because there were no real technical errors (which can be judged objectively) and if the dance evoked a sufficient emotional reaction (which is a subjective issue). Alesha claimed Ali's AS was superior to Zoe's (who had received 9 points). So why not a 10 for Ali? It didn't make sense. Quote:
I totally agree. One of the reasons I can't warm to Ricky and Natalie's dancing is that it seems jagged (?) I watch it half tense as it is so agrressive. If he could be less brutal and more flowing I would enjoy it more.
I prefer Ali's more understated approach. It's what I liked about Rachel Stevens too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
Quote:
It was more deserving than Ricky's 10 but still think on a whole it was a bit early and a bit "simple" a routine for a 10.
I know it's never going to happen, but I would like to 10 to regain its "specialness". In series 1-3 both of those routines would have gotten 8/9s. Granted Alesha wasn't there then so her scores can't be compared, but Bruno didn't give out a 10 until the Series 2 final! Now he's giving them out to anything credible past week 5 (with the expection of Kelly which is a whole other story). At least Len's seeing sense still and keeping his 10 under raps. Craig's 10s. As hidden as Craig K's dance ability, hopefully... Series 2 saw the problem of Jill's jive getting 8s/9s the first time out when it deserved 10s. Then in the final when it was less sharp and worse, it got 10s. I always thought that was as much of a farce as the over-generosity with 10s is now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: England, UK
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
If Kerplunk's Samba can get a 10, there's no particular hallmark of specialness about it, because it was crap.
Series 2 saw the problem of Jill's jive getting 8s/9s the first time out when it deserved 10s. Then in the final when it was less sharp and worse, it got 10s. I always thought that was as much of a farce as the over-generosity with 10s is now. .Jill's Jive was one of those dances that I thought didn't improve the second time around, but nevertheless still deserved 40, and believe such a routine in week 3 nowerdays would get 40. Still proves that 10s have become less of a reward, and that VT the other week about how special the 10 was, for Lisa in particular, was just a joke. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
But then wouldn't you prefer the voting system now, where Jill's Jive deserves a 40 and gets it, compared to the system in series 2, when it deserved it and didn't?
(I do think that VT was a tad agrevating, although anything reminding me of Lisa Snowdon's 40/40s will do that) |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
Let's face it viewers who do not like either Alesha or Ricky W would say the 10 was undeserved.
As for whether Alesha was qualified to give a 10, surely it all depends on whether she thought it was good enough and she obviously did, so hard cheese. Also quite happy with Ally and Brian's ten they are my second favourites. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
|
Quote:
Have to agree with you there everyone has made up their mind not to like Ricky W so there will be an uproar whenever he gets a ten!! Agree Alesha is a judge and is there to do a job and she thought it was good enough thats good enough for me.
Also quite happy with Ally and Brian's ten they are my second favourites. I'd hope most people are objective enough to acknowledge an excellent performance when they see one. To say I wasn't keen on Lisa Snowdon last year is an understatment, but that doesn't mean I begrudged her some of her high scores. She deserved them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ben Brigade Member No. 66
Posts: 2,609
|
Quote:
I think that's untrue.
I'd hope most people are objective enough to acknowledge an excellent performance when they see one. To say I wasn't keen on Lisa Snowdon last year is an understatment, but that doesn't mean I begrudged her some of her high scores. She deserved them. It might be true for you Sid but Im afraid there are plenty of people on here who judged Ricky Whittle by his beautiful cover and immediately were against him for reasons they cannot explain with conviction. I too, was not keen on Lisa or Rachel last year, but I still count a lot of Rachel's performances as some of the best ones on SCD - particularly her AT and Rumba. I just wish people would give him a chance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 144
|
I have seen no dances this year deserving a 10, 9 yes, but for a 10 it has to be perfection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ben Brigade Member No. 66
Posts: 2,609
|
Quote:
I have seen no dances this year deserving a 10, 9 yes, but for a 10 it has to be perfection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pembrokeshire.
Posts: 40,686
|
[quote=thepainter;36253613]I have seen no dances this year deserving a 10, 9 yes, but for a 10 it has to be perfection.[/QUOTE]
Ohh is this a new ruling this year
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
|
I liked Zoe's AS more thatn Ali's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Away with the faries
Posts: 27,378
|
Quote:
But why should there be any uproar?
Or, put another way, why be surprised that there wasn't? Quote:
Honestly, I think she'd be able to do a slightly less complicated routine which was still more complex than anything most of the other couples could manage. I do think Ricky and Natalie's latins are almost violently aggressive and harsh, and I think she might be getting slightly carried away with Ricky being such a good student in the same way that Brian was with Ali (though not so markedly, perhaps). I want to see Natalie choreograph something difficult but a little more subtle - I think it'd do wonders for them.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
I agree it was the best dance we've seen this series, although I still wasn't knocked out by it. But does that mean that every time someone performs better than Ricky W's far from flawless VW it has to get a 10 simply because an unqualified judge overmarked Ricky on an earlier occasion? Two wrongs and all that.
Looked at the other way - they are throwing 8s away like confetti because Len has devalued sEven and only Craig is using 1-4 . The result of that is that 9s are also devalued as they mean better than my eights were and 9s will soon replace those 8s as the dancers get better. As that happens, you simply have to give something thats better than your 9s a 10. If someone doesn't throw out the odd ten to split the pack we will soon have 4 people always tied on 36 and another bunch on 32. I agree mark inflation ends with people getting 39s and 40s that are questionable (Lisa anyone) as the numbers run out but thats where we end up when the voters vote for anyone who gets below 5 and sympathise with anyone who gets below 8. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
I have seen no dances this year deserving a 10, 9 yes, but for a 10 it has to be perfection.
When you don't have the luxury of having a decimal point or percentage out of 100 to give, the question is which is it nearer to and are you happy its near enough to it. As you would start thinking about giving a 9 somewhere in the 8s and you might give it if something was particularly impressive in a whole which was nearer to 8, the same thing will happen in the 9s. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a Whittle Wonderland!
Posts: 37,511
|
Thanks to everyone who has responded, seriously I wasn't expecting such a great response. I particularly like the posts which have taken the debate further to as to why a 10 isn't a 10, and the over inflation of the marks over the past few series.
I tend to side with those who believe there was always going to be a problem on this forum if Ricky got the first 10. The pros don't seem to have a problem with him; Matt, Brendan, James and Vincent have all been quoted as offering him tips and advice. It would seem that they are happy to encourage his natural talent, yet on here we just want to knock him every chance we get. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:01.




.
