Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Or finishing on the 12th...
I mean, they would have to presumably if they haven't got enough contestants left.
They should ensure they start with enough contestants to ensure 5 are left by the semi-final - and if 5 are still standing, then eliminate the worst 2 leaving 3 in the final. If you've only got 4 by the time you get to the semi-final then you only drop 1.”
“Or finishing on the 12th...

I mean, they would have to presumably if they haven't got enough contestants left.
They should ensure they start with enough contestants to ensure 5 are left by the semi-final - and if 5 are still standing, then eliminate the worst 2 leaving 3 in the final. If you've only got 4 by the time you get to the semi-final then you only drop 1.”
The problem with this idea is that it means either increasing the number of celebrities or starting the series a week or two later.
They may not want to do the former cos 16 contestants, which they had this year, seems about saturation pont. And they won't like to do the latter because, contrary to what some people on this thread think, Strictly is still one of BBC1's biggest ratings hits.
An alternative idea would be to have the eliminated contestant on any week spend the next week rehearsing a dance so that they could return to the contest as a substitute if anyone has to drop out.
Finishing on the 12th? The same weekend as X Factor Final? Owch!
They could always go for a Battle Of The Champions programme on the 19th. They would have no problem finding at least one past champion to participate cos she's sitting on the judging panel, and Darcey Bushell's signed up for that week so they would still have 4 judges.




Louis Walsh will be the rulebook adjudicator to see if this is allowable