Originally Posted by TeresaAL:
“You missed my point, what was wrong with it? Apart from a tiny but of skipping, and not all the way through, why was it short of a 10 by two marks?
It was surely worth at least a nine. (Only one judge gave them a nine) I would just like the judges to explain.”
Sometimes "what was wrong" is just the routine not sparkling enough. In this case I suspect it lost one mark for a few technical issues, and another for not being a really "wow" routine. Granted that is hard to do in a VW, but it has been done.
I'd be quite happy with a judging system which was openly giving nines for technical perfection, and tens for technical perfection plus capturing the audience. Much better surely than "well there wasn't anything bad about it" being worth a ten! Of course that seems to be the precedent the judges created for themselves in series six