DS Forums

 
 

Series 1-6... do you agree the right dancers won?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2009, 20:01
ajdcbg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: cambs
Posts: 404
s1 - natasha was the best by miles without being really that good , especially if you compare here to the standard of future runners up and SF , let alone winners

s2 - Jill was a worthy winner

s3 - Zoe , Darren or Colin were all the same really - Erin cost Colin the win , really

s4 - Mark was worthy , just ahead of Emma and Matt with Louisa right in there.

s5 - Alesha was head and shoulders above the rest

s6 - NO. NO . NO. Austin went too early and the final should have been Rachel vs Lisa.
ajdcbg is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 01-11-2009, 20:14
Monkseal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
1. Claire Sweeney was the best by miles but the series was such a nonsense I think Lesley Garrett should have won, just to erase the ensunig 6 years of Anton whining. I never got Kerplunk - still don't. She was piss poor.

2. Denise Lewis for the win all the way, although I can begrudginly accept St Jill of the Halfpenny.

3. Zoe should have won - she and Colin were neck and neck until the finale, both doing "iconic" routines (his quickstep, her tango), then she did a great showdance and he did... that bollocks.

4. Rampant-pants for sure, especially when it got down to the final 3. Neither of the others were in his league even remotely.

5. Alesha was definitely the right choice, especially as the aduience seems to basically refuse point blank to vote for women 95% of the time these days. You have to take that 5% where you can.

6. Austin wuz robbed. No more or less than that.

7. Unless Jade pulls it out of the bag, I can't imagine I'm going to agree with this one either.
Monkseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 20:21
katmobile
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,943
1 and 2 made sense.

3 Was a case of the story v excellence. The story was strong even if on ability Zoe and Colin should have been the top 2 .

4 was a complete nonsense. Matt was weak and no real competition. The result was either going to be one sided or a farce.The competition was Emma and she wasn't even in the final which devalued the win. Emma's competiton was Louisa and that battle was also left in an unsatisfactory way.

5 Alesha was the right winner but her opposition wasn't there at key stages as Gaby, Kelly and Gethin went too early and we never saw her challenged fully.


6 was a nonsense. Tom was the weakest of the last 3 or 4 and his one good showdance came after most votes were in. Not sure how you should reward an actor practically acting a 30s film scene anyway. Tom didn't have a journey story apart from down the aisle , hadn't got much better at dancing than he was early on and his acting was decidedly ham. Austin just vanished without their competition being resolved and none of the top females had any votes from Cherie to Lisa to Rachel. There was no good reason for this other than that female voters tend to think think males have likeable personalities and find fault with females who are not like them . The tour showed what happened when people actually voted on the dancing. The whole thing was also distorted more by the JS issue . It was a triumph for the anti-judge vote followed by a vote on sex appeal not dancing.

This year looks even worse. The third best dancer already is out,the three and possibly 4 top females don't have any votes, the runaway winner may or may not, the people we know have votes who might make the final are far worse than Louisa, Austin, Cherie or even Matt. The voting is more sexist than ever and we have potentially 3 people in JS mode who wil be very difficult to remove and won't walk.
I'm sorry but I don't buy your jealus hatus arguements. Lisa wasn't likely because she was over-marked and Brendan behaved like a tit about their marks although I really liked her Cherie was the same - either had much in the way of decent latin apart from Cherie's rhumba. Rachel was a lovely dancer but a personality vaccum and some of her dances were accomplished but dull - the foxtrot being a prime example. On the other hand Jodie and Christine were carried into the competition beyond their dancing abilities but what destroys your arguement that this was a former supermodel and a lady who was attractive enough to have been a model. No one was the complete package in series six but Austin was my favourite not because I fancied him (anyone who knows me knows my type runs to fair haired beanpoles i.e not gun-loaded little shorties) but because he was talented, had flair and a dry sense of humour which made me root for him before he even steped on the floor.

his year I'm rooting for Jade and on DS at least sex appeal is not doing anything to endear people to Ricky W that his dancing isn't. Also Chris and Ricky G aren't sex symbols people like their personalities and in their relationships with their partners. Craig's a sweet guy but I think people are just giving him the bone of Blackpool and he won't last much longer after that. The anti-woman vote of women hasn't saved Joe Calzagie or Rav Wilding. Ricky W who is the obvious hunk doesn't need the crumpet vote - his dancing is good enough to keep him on by itself and when he has a bad week the judges love him enough to mark him higher than other people would be. Laila is getting the votes when she needs them and she's not beaten with the ugly stick. I think there is just a very clear split between the talented dancers and the appealing personalities - with the good dancers being bland personalities and the less good having a lot of personality - for my money only Jade combines both but the public don't appear to love her I think like Denise Lewis perhaps she comes across as too agressive. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out but I don't think it's to do with sexism.
katmobile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 20:59
hiua6c
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hangin with Bunny & the Kiwi
Posts: 4,318
Series one - Yes
Series two - Yes
Series three - 50/50 Daren danced well on the night Colin was better over all but it was puppet gate that did for him.
Series four - Yes I suppose but I preferred Matt Dawson
Series five - Yes but should have been Gethin in the final
Series six - no final should have been Rachel, Lisa and Austin I think Rachel or Austin would have won (Even though being in the minority I did actually like Lisa esp her ballroom)

Series seven - God only knows
hiua6c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 22:40
strictly-comet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 172
series one-yes!
series 2- yes
series 3-yes
series 4- yes
series 5 - yes
series 6 - hell no, should have been lisa, scoring 80/80 in the final and not winning is a travesty. and tom fell over...
strictly-comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 22:47
qwertyqueen
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,334
series one-yes!
series 2- yes
series 3-yes
series 4- yes
series 5 - yes
series 6 - hell no, should have been lisa, scoring 80/80 in the final and not winning is a travesty. and tom fell over...
The fact that she scored 80/80 was a travesty.
qwertyqueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 22:57
boddism
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Coast
Posts: 16,040
The fact that she scored 80/80 was a travesty.
The judges just couldnt stop overmarking her could they??

And personally I couldnt see much difference btw her and rachel tbh....

Anyway the hysterics didnt work did they?? I reckon the public resented having someone "pushed" on them....
I think the appauling show dance was a good get out clause for Lisa - shed have come 3rd even with a good show dance!

will never forget Len's face-like-a-slapped-arse look when Tom won! PRICELESS!!

Feeling the BIIIIIIIG love for Austin on here...
boddism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 23:30
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
I'm sorry but I don't buy your jealus hatus arguements. Lisa wasn't likely because she was over-marked and Brendan behaved like a tit about their marks although I really liked her Cherie was the same - either had much in the way of decent latin apart from Cherie's rhumba. Rachel was a lovely dancer but a personality vaccum and some of her dances were accomplished but dull - the foxtrot being a prime example. On the other hand Jodie and Christine were carried into the competition beyond their dancing abilities but what destroys your arguement that this was a former supermodel and a lady who was attractive enough to have been a model. No one was the complete package in series six but Austin was my favourite not because I fancied him (anyone who knows me knows my type runs to fair haired beanpoles i.e not gun-loaded little shorties) but because he was talented, had flair and a dry sense of humour which made me root for him before he even steped on the floor.

his year I'm rooting for Jade and on DS at least sex appeal is not doing anything to endear people to Ricky W that his dancing isn't. Also Chris and Ricky G aren't sex symbols people like their personalities and in their relationships with their partners. Craig's a sweet guy but I think people are just giving him the bone of Blackpool and he won't last much longer after that. The anti-woman vote of women hasn't saved Joe Calzagie or Rav Wilding. Ricky W who is the obvious hunk doesn't need the crumpet vote - his dancing is good enough to keep him on by itself and when he has a bad week the judges love him enough to mark him higher than other people would be. Laila is getting the votes when she needs them and she's not beaten with the ugly stick. I think there is just a very clear split between the talented dancers and the appealing personalities - with the good dancers being bland personalities and the less good having a lot of personality - for my money only Jade combines both but the public don't appear to love her I think like Denise Lewis perhaps she comes across as too agressive. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out but I don't think it's to do with sexism.
Point is that none of Rachel , Lisa or Cherie had votes that matched their ability and the votes were out by a very large margin. You could argue whether Lisa and Rachel were top2 or top 5 and in what order but they were struggling at the bottom of the public vote.

The Lisa overmarking argument is true but the cause wasthe judges responding to that she was already at the bottom of the vote. Not voting for her because she was being overmarked seems unfair - its not her fault and it doesn't alter the point that she may have deserved 38 rather than 40 anyway.

I don't believe the personality argument. I think its just a female audience inherently finding male celebrities more attractive. There was no evidence that Rachel had less personality than Tom and the producers spent ages on ITT and in the VTs showing precisely the opposite and that she had one of the closest relationships on the shows with Vincent. Change the venue and the audience and the close ups and the tour crowds seem to reverse the decision over who shows most personality or is more passionate in their dancing.

Its true that females have had journey stories and you are right its more complex but none of the female journey stories have won either. You are right too something has happened to the anti-judge vote - though it may be it was going to just too many people and Joe was too bad to save him.

We don't know anything much about Ricky W's popularity - he could be like Ray on DOI very safe if not leading and bound to win or he could be getting Ray and Spooney's problem plus negatives for being too good. Anton (either support for him or sympathy for Laila ) I think explains Laila's success. I can see a personality argument for Ricky G , Phil , or Craig - but I would avoid all of them and Chris would fail my personality interview even for giving the weather forecast. I don't think that disproves the point though because on what I am watching its clear that Zoe, Ali and Jade are all at least as inspiring personalities as those 4, they are all trying as hard and they have at least as good a relationship with their partners. The point is that even bland or blokish males are leading much more capable females in the voting and there's nothing objective in all the VTs we see to support that other than that one message gets through to voters and another doesn't..Even Jo has gone first with a more positive personality and better journey story and about the same ability as Craig.

I think its a mess. Jade has been bottom two too and may just knock out or be knocked out by Ali. She can't act so I don't see her pulling anything great out. Laila has Anton which gets her votes but leaves her good at only half the dances. I can see weeks of, whichever of Ali or Jade isn't in the top 2, knocking weaker people out in dance offs until they meet eachother or Ricky W and then us ending up with Ricky W in the final against someone who should have gone out a month or more before.
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 23:45
*Laura*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a Whittle Wonderland!
Posts: 37,511
Point is that none of Rachel , Lisa or Cherie had votes that matched their ability and the votes were out by a very large margin. You could argue whether Lisa and Rachel were top2 or top 5 and in what order but they were struggling at the bottom of the public vote.

The Lisa overmarking argument is true but the cause wasthe judges responding to that she was already at the bottom of the vote. Not voting for her because she was being overmarked seems unfair - its not her fault and it doesn't alter the point that she may have deserved 38 rather than 40 anyway.

I don't believe the personality argument. I think its just a female audience inherently finding male celebrities more attractive. There was no evidence that Rachel had less personality than Tom and the producers spent ages on ITT and in the VTs showing precisely the opposite and that she had one of the closest relationships on the shows with Vincent. Change the venue and the audience and the close ups and the tour crowds seem to reverse the decision over who shows most personality or is more passionate in their dancing.

Its true that females have had journey stories and you are right its more complex but none of the female journey stories have won either. You are right too something has happened to the anti-judge vote - though it may be it was going to just too many people and Joe was too bad to save him.

We don't know anything much about Ricky W's popularity - he could be like Ray on DOI very safe if not leading and bound to win or he could be getting Ray and Spooney's problem plus negatives for being too good. Anton (either support for him or sympathy for Laila ) I think explains Laila's success. I can see a personality argument for Ricky G , Phil , or Craig - but I would avoid all of them and Chris would fail my personality interview even for giving the weather forecast. I don't think that disproves the point though because on what I am watching its clear that Zoe, Ali and Jade are all at least as inspiring personalities as those 4, they are all trying as hard and they have at least as good a relationship with their partners. The point is that even bland or blokish males are leading much more capable females in the voting and there's nothing objective in all the VTs we see to support that other than that one message gets through to voters and another doesn't..Even Jo has gone first with a more positive personality and better journey story and about the same ability as Craig.

I think its a mess. Jade has been bottom two too and may just knock out or be knocked out by Ali. She can't act so I don't see her pulling anything great out. Laila has Anton which gets her votes but leaves her good at only half the dances. I can see weeks of, whichever of Ali or Jade isn't in the top 2, knocking weaker people out in dance offs until they meet eachother or Ricky W and then us ending up with Ricky W in the final against someone who should have gone out a month or more before.
Apologies for quoting the whole post but, that was a very well thought out analysis which I wholeheartedly agree with.
*Laura* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 08:42
amesouer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 231
I've always gone on...you get to the final because of your dancing ability and you win because of your showdance.
Therefore, I agree with all the winners, but not all have been my favourites.
amesouer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 09:18
Jan2555*GG*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,922
Can anyone who thinks Rachel should have won remember any of her dances without looking them up?
Yes I can because she was in my opinion technically the best celeb dancer to ever be on Strictly.....just a shame she didnt have the personality to match....in dancing terms she knocked Alesha into a cocked hat and deservedly won many of the tour dates.

She didnt win because people look for different things and thats fine but just because you didnt like Rachel at all doesnt mean that many of us didnt.

Whilst not popular with the juges I loves her jive and quickstep and her Argetine Tango was amazing.

However having said all that in terms of dance ability AND personality Austin should have won last year.
Jan2555*GG* is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 09:50
Auds77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,703
I wanted Matt Dawson to win his year.
I wanted Matt DiAngelo to win his year
I wanted Lisa Snowdon to win last year.

I'm not picking a favourite this year as I'll only jinx them.
Whoever looks after jinxes and the like probably already knows I like Brian & Ali
Auds77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 12:25
jackier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 454
Colin Jackson definitely best in S3, I'll echo the comments about the puppets!

Last year Rachel Stevens or Austin Healy

Apart from those tended to agree, although wouldn't have been upset if Denise Lewis had won in S2
jackier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 15:01
britishchippy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19
S1 - Natasha Kaplinsky - Yes
S2 - Jill Halfpenny - Yes
S3 - No - Zoe Ball should have won
S4 - No - Emma Bunton should have won
S5 - Alesha Dixon - Yes, although Matt would have also been great
S6 - No, although Tom's showdance was fab I really couldn't stand him. Austin or Rachel should have lifted the trophy.
S7 - too soon to tell!
britishchippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 15:23
KipsKaz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 656
Mostly yes.

However:

Colin should have won in series 3 - flipping Erin.

I still think Gethin would've beaten Alesha if he'd made it to the final. He was definately ahead in the public vote. I'm not going to bring up Gethingate again though!

Not getting the Austin thing. He wasn't the best dancer last year and I personally found him irritating. Lisa was NOT overmarked in comparison to the others. The marks were all generally high last year. I'd have gone for Lisa myself but I think Tom was the best compromise winner of personality and dance ability.
KipsKaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2009, 18:46
JuJus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,580
, although I would rate Denise's QS higher than Jill's Jive! .

So would I

1: Yes
2: Denise Lewis:
3: Colin Jackson
4: Mark better o/a but Matt D, for his ballroom and I do love the ballroom dances
5: Yes, but would have been happy with either of the finalists
6: Austin all the way!!
JuJus is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:03.