• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Alesha - comments tonight? (merged)
<<
<
37 of 41
>>
>
Aida
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by samiskim:
“I would like to ask Katrinap and Aida this question. How would you personally feel if you had been spoken to like that in front of millions of viewers? ”


Howling with laughter - how on earth am I supposed to imagine myself in a situation where I'm a very minor jobbing actor recently dropped from a soap, desperately trying to improve a less than lustrous career - and - simultaneously try to imagine that I also have no personal insight and a wholly misguided belief that I'm a wonderful dancer despite garnering low marks and sustained criticism for the previous weeks I've participated in the competition?

Oh yes, and before I forget, I'd also have to manage to subsume any guilt which resulted from the shameful way I'd bigged up my birthday and begged the voting public to 'get me to Blackpool' as well as blithely ignoring the facial expressions and body language of my professional who quite clearly couldn't wait to see the back of me!

Perhaps Kelly's a better actor than I thought he was!
Tissy
12-11-2009
I wouldn`t mind being spoken to like that in public for whatever fee they`re getting paid
Servalan
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Dr. Jan Itor:
“The criticism of the judges over the way they dealt with John Sergeant last year was at least as over the top as anything in this thread. I agree that a number of the comments about Alesha have gone too far, but that is true not only of the other judges in the past, but also of Bruce and Tess plus a number of contestants.”

I am well aware that there have been many heated threads about the judges in the past.

However, I would challenge you to locate any that persistently attack anyone as personally and as vitriolically as the threads attacking Alesha have. 'Once a bitch, always a bitch' ...?

I don't think Alesha is perfect by any means but why exactly should only she should be singled out in this way when others have behaved much worse?
Servalan
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Aida:
“Howling with laughter - how on earth am I supposed to imagine myself in a situation where I'm a very minor jobbing actor recently dropped from a soap, desperately trying to improve a less than lustrous career - and - simultaneously try to imagine that I also have no personal insight and a wholly misguided belief that I'm a wonderful dancer despite garnering low marks and sustained criticism for the previous weeks I've participated in the competition?

Oh yes, and before I forget, I'd also have to manage to subsume any guilt which resulted from the shameful way I'd bigged up my birthday and begged the voting public to 'get me to Blackpool' as well as blithely ignoring the facial expressions and body language of my professional who quite clearly couldn't wait to see the back of me!

Perhaps Kelly's a better actor than I thought he was! ”

Hurrah!

Some sanity at last!

*applauds*
norbitonite
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Tissy:
“I wouldn`t mind being spoken to like that in public for whatever fee they`re getting paid ”


Presumably, though, nor would you mind having to sit through a 90 second dance for whatever fee Alesha's getting paid?
lotty27
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“Comparing John Sergeant to Craig is so wide of the mark it's not true. JS, whether you liked him or not, brought his personality to the dancefloor and won many of the public over by answering the judges back. Craig did neither of those, so it's perfectly possible for Alesha to be entertained by JS but not by Craig. It's also very obvious that Craig wasn't actually that popular - he can't have been to end up in the dance-off ... although this key fact seems to have mysteriously lost in this thread.

Of course everyone is entitled to an opinion - but it really seems that some basic facts are being forgotten in all this. You use the phrase 'completely OTT'' - I think that says it all.”

JS was entertaining was he? I thought he was crap IMO Craig's a much better dancer than JS!

My point was that (forgetting for a moment who was popular and who wasn't) Arlene was completely frustrated by JS last year and slagged him off at every opportunity (which I'm convinced cost her her job this year), yet Alesha in interviews used to say she liked him! Now THIS year Alesha was obviously frustrated by Craig, but some people out there must have thought he was entertaining for him to stay in this long. I was making a point that it's obviously different when you're a judge and the boots on the other foot. Now Alesha can understand how frustrating it is for the judges when good dancers go out and poor dancers stay in. HOWEVER, did Arlene (or the other judges come to that) ever say to someone: 'I can't believe ***** has gone out and I have had to endure that!'? To the best of my knowledge she didn't (but I'm sure someone will put me right if I'm wrong). Quite simply it's called BEING PROFESSIONAL. Yes she said plenty of vitriolic comments but I can't remember her actually naming anyone to another contestant and then remarking about having to 'endure' the remaining competitors dance. It also makes me wonder: if JS was a competitor THIS year what Alesha would have said to him if she did that to Craig

But IMHO if Arlene DID say something similar she'd maybe earned her spurs to say so. Yes she could get nasty but she also has a vast dance background and huge knowledge of the subject with to back up her comments. And I think THAT is most objectors problem with Alesha. She hasn't got any vast knowledge with which to back up her not so nice comments and

(a) therefore she isn't being taken so seriously as the other judges especially as she's supposed to be there because she's been through the process and knows that it's like and therefore should be more sympathetic and
(b) the reason why when she says something nasty there's this huge fuss

The general consensus is that the other judges can be just as nasty but they've been on the show a lot longer, have earned their position on the panel and therefore are forgiven a lot more easily. We know what they're like, Alesha is still being judged by US.

And I'll continue to say 'completely OTT' because IMO it was. Not only what she said but the downright nasty attitude it was said with.

And I genuinely wish she hadn't said it and shown this side of her character
soulmate61
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“
I don't think Alesha is perfect by any means but why exactly should only she should be singled out in this way when others have behaved much worse?”

I suggest there is a structural contradiction, for which the Beeb ought to bear responsibility.

The other four have always been judges not contestants. The Beeb carefully draw a line, with judges on one side, celebs and pro dancers on the other. Their dressing rooms are far apart, and fraternising between the two sides is I believe discouraged.

If a recent celeb is promoted to the judges bench, openly admitted as unqualified to be judge but sitting there purportedly as the celebs' chum, exactly whose side is she on?

As the celebs' chum she cannot endure Craig Kelly.
Can she endure the drunken ragdoll?
Who else can she not endure?

If a footballer plays for one side in the first half, then in the second half is promoted as referee "to lay down the law and simultaneously put the players' point of view", what are the spectators to think?
lotty27
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by soulmate61:
“I suggest there is a structural contradiction, for which the Beeb ought to bear responsibility.

The other four have always been judges not contestants. The Beeb carefully draw a line, with judges on one side, celebs and pro dancers on the other. Their dressing rooms are far apart, and fraternising between the two sides is I believe discouraged.

If a recent celeb is promoted to the judges bench, openly admitted as unqualified to be judge but sitting there purportedly as the celebs' chum, exactly whose side is she on?

As the celebs' chum she cannot endure Craig Kelly.
Can she endure the drunken ragdoll?
Who else can she not endure?

If a footballer plays for one side in the first half, then in the second half is promoted as referee "to lay down the law and simultaneously put the players' point of view", what are the spectators to think? ”

Well said! Good post IMO!
milagrosa
12-11-2009
I was shocked and saddened by Alesha's comments to Craig. She is supposed to understand what it is like to be a celebrity contestant and this was the justification for her being appointed. Unfortunately this showed she has no idea what it feels like to be subjected to personal and vindictive remarks and no empathy for those who struggle more than she did. I strongly suspect, from the look on Craig's face, that her remarks were the most hurtful and I do hope she feels some measure of shame.

Maybe it would have been better to have had John Sergeant or Fiona Phillips as judges
norbitonite
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Aida:
“Howling with laughter - how on earth am I supposed to imagine myself in a situation where I'm a very minor jobbing actor recently dropped from a soap, desperately trying to improve a less than lustrous career - and - simultaneously try to imagine that I also have no personal insight and a wholly misguided belief that I'm a wonderful dancer despite garnering low marks and sustained criticism for the previous weeks I've participated in the competition?

Oh yes, and before I forget, I'd also have to manage to subsume any guilt which resulted from the shameful way I'd bigged up my birthday and begged the voting public to 'get me to Blackpool' as well as blithely ignoring the facial expressions and body language of my professional who quite clearly couldn't wait to see the back of me!

Perhaps Kelly's a better actor than I thought he was! ”

Thing is, Aida, and leaving aside the entrenched Alesha can do no wrong/Alesha can do no right factions, you and some others seem to be okay with what Alesha said to Craig because he somehow deserved it. So, for you to attempt to imagine how it would feel to be on the receiving end of Alesha's comments, you feel it necessary to imagine yourself inside Craig's mind. The other poster was asking how you would feel - as the person you are - if you found yourself in a similar situation.

I, and I'm gathering others on here, too, don't think that anybody should be spoken to in the way that Alesha spoke to Craig, regardless of how good, bad or indifferent their dancing is and how oblivious to their own shortcomings they might be. For me, therefore, it matters not a jot about any side issues such as Arlene, Alesha's qualifications to be a judge, Karen H, Camilla D, Zoe and James, Craig's risible dancing, whether or not certain posters have/have not criticised other judges in the past, etc, etc, ad nauseam. What I object to is the fact that Alesha was needlessly rude in her comments and, in forum-speak, off topic.
Dr. Jan Itor
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“I am well aware that there have been many heated threads about the judges in the past.

However, I would challenge you to locate any that persistently attack anyone as personally and as vitriolically as the threads attacking Alesha have. 'Once a bitch, always a bitch' ...?

I don't think Alesha is perfect by any means but why exactly should only she should be singled out in this way when others have behaved much worse?”

How nice of you to set me a challenge that would involve me searching though hundreds of threads, particularly when the worst comments will have been removed by the mods. Thanks, but no thanks. Also, it is only fair to point out that the person who made that particular comment did retract it.
ESPIONdansant
12-11-2009
Norbitonite, I agree. She was simply needlessly rude.

Shows a lapse in taste, judgement and manners.
lotty27
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by norbitonite:
“Thing is, Aida, and leaving aside the entrenched Alesha can do no wrong/Alesha can do no right factions, you and some others seem to be okay with what Alesha said to Craig because he somehow deserved it. So, for you to attempt to imagine how it would feel to be on the receiving end of Alesha's comments, you feel it necessary to imagine yourself inside Craig's mind. The other poster was asking how you would feel - as the person you are - if you found yourself in a similar situation.

I, and I'm gathering others on here, too, don't think that anybody should be spoken to in the way that Alesha spoke to Craig, regardless of how good, bad or indifferent their dancing is and how oblivious to their own shortcomings they might be. For me, therefore, it matters not a jot about any side issues such as Arlene, Alesha's qualifications to be a judge, Karen H, Camilla D, Zoe and James, Craig's risible dancing, whether or not certain posters have/have not criticised other judges in the past, etc, etc, ad nauseam. What I object to is the fact that Alesha was needlessly rude in her comments and, in forum-speak, off topic.”

Totally agree Norbitonite THAT'S what it comes down to and I slap my hand for babbling on too much in my posts She was needlessly rude - end of!
katmobile
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Aida:
“I couldn't agree more with you, katrinap, particularly with the phrase I've emboldened - the majority of posts on this thread constitute a masterclass in 'prejudice, bigotry and personal vendetta(s)' disguised as attempts to defend the indefensible.

I'm not referring to Alesha's spontaneous decision to have a try at confrontational couselling last Saturday night, I'm referring to the bizarre and solipsistic attitude of Craig Kelly, who, despite being appraised of his failings from Week One - relatively kindly - persisted in his determined conviction that he was a good dancer who was being unfairly treated.

I've mentioned before that there are a few cohorts of posters on this forum - the Karen Hardy Worshippers, the Grammar Police. the Arlene Phillips Apologists and the Camilla Dallerup Devotees - who have been incandescent with rage since the BBC had the audacity to appoint Alesha Dixon to the heady pinnacle of 'judging' a meaningless light entertainment show without consulting them first.

Since her very first appearance, every single syllable she's uttered has been subjected to the kind of analysis usually reserved for classified legal documents - what a triumph for her champing-at-the-bit detractors last Saturday night was - at last, something to really get their teeth into and metaphorically tear her limb from limb.

I must admit, however, I find it quite hilarious reading all of the 'Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells' posts in which all of the precious flowers who reeled with horror to hear some straight talking go on to insult Ms. Dixon with more vitriol than she ever poured on a man so lacking in insight and so buoyed up by his own bizarre sense of achievement that within thirty seconds of being 'humiliated' in front of his friends and family, he was stoutly defending himself, claiming to be a good dancer and dismissing all of the judges marks and remarks as 'disgraceful'!

Not a 'witchhunt' indeed - while not even approaching the significance of Lord Nelson's statement, surely this is similar to his claim, "I see no ships"

There you go, then, Alesha-loathers - that was your starter for ten - now entertain me some more! ”

Some of the comments on here have been a bit beyond the pale calling Alesha a fishwife was rude. She WAS rude but two wrongs don't make a right. I don't think she was rude through being a nasty person but ironically like her precedessor she let her disgust at some bad being kept in at the expense at someone talented lead her across a line into saying things about them she shouldn't have done but at least Arlene didn't do to their face in their hometown, in front of their friends and family. For the record I like Alesha as a contestant both as a dancer and personality but in spite of having severe misgivings about Arlene calling JS lazy her sacking was wrong and Alesha doesn't have the experience to critise what she sees - I didn't think she'd descent to rudeness but I think becasue of her inexperience she didn't know where the line was and she crossed it. I don't think the appointment of judge was good for her - because the judges were usually nice about her she forgets that udges can and do cause a lot ire in people. The beeb should have hired Karen Hardy instead.
millie3
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by katrinap:
“And why do you make the sweeping assumption that those who try view the situation objectively are suddenly Alehsa supporters? This isn't about them and us, however much you'd like it to be.



My point was that there are many people on here who are prepared to single Alesha out for their personal two minutes of hate whatever she does. I'm vainly trying to introduce a note of context and balance, but I guess when a witch hunt's underway that's a waste of time.”

Why is that when Alesha ( or anyone else for that matter) is criticised for her behaviour it means we hate her? I certainly don't. I've supported her when she was a contestant and when she was appointed as a judge. However, that doesn't mean I am blind to things she gets wrong, To say I and others are on a witch hunt is both wrong and a lazy way of trying to win the argument.
ESPIONdansant
12-11-2009
I'm not motivated by hatred. I just feel Craig was ill-used.

It's only half about Alesha's unkind words. Perhaps it would be more important to ensure that Craig received an apology and any hurt feelings or ruffled feathers smoothed over.

She's not terribly good at her new job and she's made a lot of people spring to Craig's defence but I don't think she's hated.
samiskim
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by norbitonite:
“Thing is, Aida, and leaving aside the entrenched Alesha can do no wrong/Alesha can do no right factions, you and some others seem to be okay with what Alesha said to Craig because he somehow deserved it. So, for you to attempt to imagine how it would feel to be on the receiving end of Alesha's comments, you feel it necessary to imagine yourself inside Craig's mind. The other poster was asking how you would feel - as the person you are - if you found yourself in a similar situation.

I, and I'm gathering others on here, too, don't think that anybody should be spoken to in the way that Alesha spoke to Craig, regardless of how good, bad or indifferent their dancing is and how oblivious to their own shortcomings they might be. For me, therefore, it matters not a jot about any side issues such as Arlene, Alesha's qualifications to be a judge, Karen H, Camilla D, Zoe and James, Craig's risible dancing, whether or not certain posters have/have not criticised other judges in the past, etc, etc, ad nauseam. What I object to is the fact that Alesha was needlessly rude in her comments and, in forum-speak, off topic.”

Thank you Norbitonite - that is exactly what I meant and thank you for such a good post.
samiskim
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“And would you direct this criticism at Arlene or Bruno, both of whom have done exactly what you accuse Alesha of - and worse? ”

Yes | would - and have. It is very uncomfortable to watch people being slagged off in the name of entertainment. Arlene's contract was not renewed this year because she went too far. Bruno is getting more and more unpleasant by the minute and I have posted on this, Craig has a very waspish tongue and needs to temper his remarks. Alesha was extremely rude and if you want to support rudeness and personal attacks that is your perogative, just as it is mine to oppose it.

And don't roll your eyes at me.
nancy1975
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by samiskim:
“Yes | would - and have. It is very uncomfortable to watch people being slagged off in the name of entertainment. Arlene's contract was not renewed this year because she went too far. Bruno is getting more and more unpleasant by the minute and I have posted on this, Craig has a very waspish tongue and needs to temper his remarks. Alesha was extremely rude and if you want to support rudeness and personal attacks that is your perogative, just as it is mine to oppose it.

And don't roll your eyes at me.”

Craig is not as clever or funny as he thinks he is, and I've been as much peeved by his bitchiness as I've been annoyed by Bruno's.
Ignazio
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by nancy1975:
“Craig is not as clever or funny as he thinks he is, and I've been as much peeved by his bitchiness as I've been annoyed by Bruno's.”

To whom?

Sorry - wrong Craig.
Last edited by Ignazio : 12-11-2009 at 16:56
nancy1975
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Ignazio:
“To whom?

Sorry - wrong Craig.”

LOL, sorry, I should have been clearer!
Abbasolutely 40
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by nancy1975:
“Craig is not as clever or funny as he thinks he is, and I've been as much peeved by his bitchiness as I've been annoyed by Bruno's.”

Me too and his over use of " Dahling " every five minutes is really getting on my tits now .
nancy1975
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by Abbasolutely 40:
“Me too and his over use of " Dahling " every five minutes is really getting on my tits now .”

He never used to play up his sexual orientation, he never needed to in any case, but now he's getting beyond parody.
Abbasolutely 40
12-11-2009
Originally Posted by nancy1975:
“He never used to play up his sexual orientation, he never needed to in any case, but now he's getting beyond parody.”

All three, Bruno , Len and Craig are now carictures of themselves , so unfunny now .
soulmate61
12-11-2009
Quote:
“Originally Posted by Servalan

And would you direct this criticism at Arlene or Bruno, both of whom have done exactly what you accuse Alesha of - and worse?”

Similar comeback was once directed in Craig R-H's face,
in the form of spit landing on target,
by Jan Ravens after the Strictly eviction shoot.
By his own admission he has been slapped in the street, and somebody poo'ed on his doorstep. From his panto villain role he has earned enough now to install surveillance cameras.

Those who live by the sword........
<<
<
37 of 41
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map