Originally Posted by
Servalan:
“Comparing John Sergeant to Craig is so wide of the mark it's not true. JS, whether you liked him or not, brought his personality to the dancefloor and won many of the public over by answering the judges back. Craig did neither of those, so it's perfectly possible for Alesha to be entertained by JS but not by Craig. It's also very obvious that Craig wasn't actually that popular - he can't have been to end up in the dance-off ... although this key fact seems to have mysteriously lost in this thread. 
Of course everyone is entitled to an opinion - but it really seems that some basic facts are being forgotten in all this. You use the phrase 'completely OTT'' - I think that says it all.”
JS was entertaining was he? I thought he was crap

IMO Craig's a much better dancer than JS!
My point was that (forgetting for a moment who was popular and who wasn't) Arlene was completely frustrated by JS last year and slagged him off at every opportunity (which I'm convinced cost her her job this year), yet Alesha in interviews used to say she liked him! Now THIS year Alesha was obviously frustrated by Craig, but some people out there must have thought he was entertaining for him to stay in this long. I was making a point that it's obviously different when you're a judge and the boots on the other foot. Now Alesha can understand how frustrating it is for the judges when good dancers go out and poor dancers stay in. HOWEVER, did Arlene (or the other judges come to that)
ever say to someone: 'I can't believe ***** has gone out and I have had to endure that!'? To the best of my knowledge she didn't (but I'm sure someone will put me right if I'm wrong

). Quite simply it's called BEING PROFESSIONAL. Yes she said plenty of vitriolic comments but I can't remember her actually naming anyone to another contestant and then remarking about having to 'endure' the remaining competitors dance. It also makes me wonder: if JS was a competitor THIS year what Alesha would have said to
him if she did
that to Craig
But IMHO if Arlene DID say something similar she'd maybe earned her spurs to say so. Yes she could get nasty but she also has a vast dance background and huge knowledge of the subject with to back up her comments. And I think THAT is most objectors problem with Alesha. She hasn't got any vast knowledge with which to back up her not so nice comments and
(a) therefore she isn't being taken so seriously as the other judges especially as she's supposed to be there because she's been through the process and knows that it's like and therefore should be more sympathetic and
(b) the reason why when she says something nasty there's this huge fuss
The general consensus is that the other judges can be just as nasty but they've been on the show a lot longer, have earned their position on the panel and therefore are forgiven a lot more easily. We
know what they're like, Alesha is still being judged by US.
And I'll continue to say 'completely OTT' because IMO it was. Not only what she said but the downright nasty attitude it was said with.
And I genuinely wish she hadn't said it and shown this side of her character