DS Forums

 
 

Lets Face it............ Karen Hardy


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2009, 18:18
reclinewithme
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,026
Whan I first found out that Alesha was to be a judge, I was over the moon - a) she's my favourite contestant ever, and b) I had long thought how nice it would be to have a non-professional voice on the panel, someone who could judge the dances from an entertainment or a 'been there, done that' contestant's perspective. I was never overly keen on Arlene, and thought Alesha's lively personality would be perfect for the show, so I defended her against her detractors.

However - I hate to admit this - I haven't liked her as a judge. I've felt she's tried too hard to prove herself as a judge of the technical aspects, and hasn't been the 'voice of the people' I'd hoped she'd be. Her comments to Craig were not good, either. So, to cut a long story short, if the Beeb replaced her with Karen Hardy, I wouldn't mind. With hindsight I have to admit, I think Karen would be preferable. Being a professional isn't just about your dance experience, it's about how you conduct yourself in a position of responsibility, and Alesha for me hasn't been as good at that as she was at dancing.
reclinewithme is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 08-11-2009, 18:36
twin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,017
Karen Hardy would have been better, but she is just too busy running her own dance school. Simple as that.
twin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 18:49
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
However - I hate to admit this - I haven't liked her as a judge. I've felt she's tried too hard to prove herself as a judge of the technical aspects, and hasn't been the 'voice of the people' I'd hoped she'd be.
And, yet again, it seems the 'public' don't know what they want. She's been derided for being too technical and not technical enough.

It's called respect

Karen would have loads - Aleisha has Zero
Really? The same respect the public gave Arlene. That they give Len? There doesn't seem to be much evidence of that so why should Karen be any different?

What I would like is for there to be a fifth judge, the pro who has been kicked out the previous week. That way there'd be no "Len has the deciding vote".
That wouldn't work - do you think if Chris and Ola had been in the dance off this week there might have been a slight conflict of interests with James on the panel....?

Mind you, a chimpanzee trained to hold up one of those score paddles could do as good a job as that obnoxious and rather thick young girl
Still amuses me that people deride Alesha for being ignorant and rude....by being ignorant and rude.


I really don't care if Karen or Alesha judge, I'm just glad I don't have to listen to Arlene any more. I do think there's a real 'the grass is always greener' attitude towards Karen being a judge though. It wouldn't suddenly bring harmony to the judging panel. It certainly wouldn't stop people moaning about the judges and what they do; they'd just find something else to moan about apart from her grammar.

Although, at least if Karen was on the panel we might get away without seeing dozens of different mistaken spellings of her name...
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 19:09
kopy-lover
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 789
I've been saying it right from Arlene being sacked....KAREN HARDY SHOULD BE THE NEW JUDGE.


It would even the panel up in that with Karen and Len we'd have two people who understood the technicalities of Ballroom dancing, and in Bruno and Craig two people who only know general dancing.


but I'm not sure I could really hear Karen giving such useful advice as "you was wikid innit".
kopy-lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 19:25
JethroUK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Loughboro', Leicester (ex NTL)
Posts: 5,953
And, yet again, it seems the 'public' don't know what they want. She's been derided for being too technical and not technical enough.
You mean *you* dont know what the public want - but the public certainly do

Aleisha will never be respected as 'an authority' on dance - and 3 months training wont make damned bit of difference to that - she should've taken up position of 'voice of the public' - alas she dropped a boob by trying to be clever

if/when Aleisha has been judging dance for 20 years she will slowly gain respect of the public for her opinion - she must be deluded if she thinks the public will respect her much before then

Really? The same respect the public gave Arlene. That they give Len? There doesn't seem to be much evidence of that so why should Karen be any different?
All the judges (apart from Aleisha) are respected for their professional judgement - that is beyond reproach


.
JethroUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 19:39
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
You mean *you* dont know what the public want - but the public certainly do
No, they don't. Some said they didn't like Alesha because she wasn't technical enough. Some said that they didn't like her when she gave technical criticisms. Clearly there are total opposites of opinion.

All the judges (apart from Aleisha) are respected for their professional judgement - that is beyond reproach.
I'll remember that the next time people are complaining about favouritism, some being judges' pets, Ricky getting away with mistakes and still being marked well etc...

Perhaps they should have used that professional judgement last week and pointed out to Natalie that she needed to point her toes during the jive. After all, they brought it up with many other couples but seemed to ignore it with her in order to talk about her enthusiasm.
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 19:51
JethroUK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Loughboro', Leicester (ex NTL)
Posts: 5,953
.. Some said they didn't like Alesha because she wasn't technical enough...
Never seen that ever

There's no division of opinion

Alesha is way out of her depth talking about technicalities of which she knows nowt, zippo, baggar all

and that's the only reason people dont like her - she simply has not yet earned respect as a judge - unlike Karen who would be highly regarded and respected


..I'll remember that the next time people are complaining about favouritism...
Public dont have to respect judges personalities and favouritisms - but they respect their professional opinion on dance

which is why they're employed as judges of dance - does this make any sense yet?

.
JethroUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 20:09
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
Never seen that ever
It was all people could say after her first show!

Thing is, if people on this forum can pick up enough technical knowledge to correctly critique the contestants' dancing ability simply through watching the show, then there's nothing to say that Alesha can't after her far more extensive experience.

Public dont have to respect judges personalities and favouritisms - but they respect their professional opinion on dance
But they don't. For a great example see how the judge's opinion of Lisa Snowdon's cha cha differed with what the public thought about its quality.
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 20:26
pickledgherkin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,826
Apart from her grammar, Alesha is doing quite well. I am amazed and impressed at how much she has improved as a judge.
pickledgherkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 20:40
tabithakitten
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,240
No, they don't. Some said they didn't like Alesha because she wasn't technical enough. Some said that they didn't like her when she gave technical criticisms. Clearly there are total opposites of opinion.


I'll remember that the next time people are complaining about favouritism, some being judges' pets, Ricky getting away with mistakes and still being marked well etc...

Perhaps they should have used that professional judgement last week and pointed out to Natalie that she needed to point her toes during the jive. After all, they brought it up with many other couples but seemed to ignore it with her in order to talk about her enthusiasm.
The public are not one entity; they comprise many individuals.

There will be some who resent Alesha's appointment because she doesn't have the professional dancing credentials to be a judge. These are the people who will complain about Alesha making technical comments because, in their eyes, she is not qualified to do so.

However, there are others who had an open mind with regards to Alesha's appointment. Such people probably want comments from her with a bit more about them than, "You looked great," or "You're really likeable."

Saying the public don't know what they want because you've heard opposing sides to the same argument is like saying the public don't know what they want because they're all voting for different people.

Alesha has a tough job. She'll never convince those who opposed her appointment in the first place due to lack of credentials. She might as well not try. If she can give some constructive criticism about performance and technique without it getting personal (as she's managed to do several times) then that'll do for me.

Alesha:
Don't give bland comments because you're worried that people will resent you if you try to be technical. Stuff them - you were taken on to do a job, now do it to the best of your ability. However, don't start thinking you can belittle contestants because things have happened that you don't agree with. You, of all the panel, know how much effort they put in and what it takes to put themselves out there every Saturday - none of them deserve that.
tabithakitten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 20:44
letsdance
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 352
Not a fan of Alesha as a judge, but Karen would probably make me stop watching the program altogether... Great dancer, but soooo irritating.
I think it's a bad idea to get judges from the ex pros, they're likely to have their favourites, axes to grind etc. because of their previous history with the program. And even if they didn't they could easily be accused of it. Surely it shouldn't be that difficult to find judges outside the SCD world...
letsdance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 21:39
babinaba
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,387
Karen was giving us pointers during the screening last night after each dance and she was v. good in just that short amount of time (bit where they were in Tess's room before the scores) - if someone was bad she told us where they went wrong etc etc - and she even found a small fault with Ali's dance, though she did say she was being evily picky! lol. I think she would have been great as a judge.
babinaba is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 05:04
Moontaker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 2,976
On the technical side of things Karen would be good, as would most of the professionals but personally I'm not keen, she thinks far too highly of herself, she doesn't have the same likeability factor as Alesha imo.
Moontaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 10:31
The_abbott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,566
As a license fee payer, Karen Hardy would probably have come cheaper than Alesha!
The_abbott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 10:50
Ignazio
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,110
Not a fan of Alesha as a judge, but Karen would probably make me stop watching the program altogether... Great dancer, but soooo irritating.
I think it's a bad idea to get judges from the ex pros, they're likely to have their favourites, axes to grind etc. because of their previous history with the program. And even if they didn't they could easily be accused of it. Surely it shouldn't be that difficult to find judges outside the SCD world...
An ex contestant might possibly (probably) favour his/her ex partner. Had Matt and Martina stayed for any length of time, would Alesha have remained impartial?

On the technical side of things Karen would be good, as would most of the professionals but personally I'm not keen, she thinks far too highly of herself, she doesn't have the same likeability factor as Alesha imo.
I think after Saturday Alesha's likeability mask slipped - to reveal the real, not very likeable Alesha!
Ignazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:19
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
I think after Saturday Alesha's likeability mask slipped - to reveal the real, not very likeable Alesha!
Or she was momentarily p*ssed off. Unless you are really suggesting that one sharp comment clearly indicates that someone is a terrible person underneath...
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:44
Ignazio
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,110
Or she was momentarily p*ssed off. Unless you are really suggesting that one sharp comment clearly indicates that someone is a terrible person underneath...
She isn't being paid a heft salary to be pissed off because one of her favourites left - she's being paid to offer constructive criticism. Personally I don't think she has the experience or qualifications to be constructive, but that's a topic which has already been done to death.

Take my comments at face value - don't attempt to read into them something that isn't there!
Ignazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 13:38
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
Take my comments at face value - don't attempt to read into them something that isn't there!
I did.

You stated that the real Alesha is not very likeable and the 'normal' one we see is an act.

I suggested that may be a tad premature to decide that based upon one heated comment...
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 18:20
Emmersonne
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,445
Karen wouldn't take it up if it was offered, I don't think. She has so many other commitments with her dance school, and always described her SCD break as her 'indulgence'

I can't see her doing it for a judging role,
Emmersonne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 18:25
memmh
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: glued to the computer
Posts: 10,035
Not a fan of Alesha as a judge, but Karen would probably make me stop watching the program altogether... Great dancer, but soooo irritating.
I think it's a bad idea to get judges from the ex pros, they're likely to have their favourites, axes to grind etc. because of their previous history with the program. And even if they didn't they could easily be accused of it. Surely it shouldn't be that difficult to find judges outside the SCD world...
Karen's a professional judge who has judged some, if not all, of the pro dancers in competition, so I'm sure she knows how to put aside any impartiality she may have and to judge objectively.


Karen wouldn't take it up if it was offered, I don't think. She has so many other commitments with her dance school, and always described her SCD break as her 'indulgence'
She said after last series that she was going to withdraw as a pro dancer because of that. To train and nurture the celebs is an enormous time commitment but the judges have a much lesser commitment than that, so it's not impossible that she might do it.
memmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 21:56
Ignazio
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,110
I did.

You stated that the real Alesha is not very likeable and the 'normal' one we see is an act.

I suggested that may be a tad premature to decide that based upon one heated comment...
You've massaged your comments more than a little.

This is what you actually said:

Unless you are really suggesting that one sharp comment clearly indicates that someone is a terrible person underneath...
Shall we leave it there?
Ignazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 22:04
Mrs F
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,951
Apart from her grammar, Alesha is doing quite well. I am amazed and impressed at how much she has improved as a judge.
I'm convinced someone is telling her what to say, have you noticed that she wears her hair long, ideal for covering an earpiece
Mrs F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 22:08
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
Shall we leave it there?
Whatever way you argue the semantics, you said Alesha's comment showed who she really is. I still stand by the fact that it's a tad unfair to base your view of her personality on one frustrated comment.
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 22:27
Ignazio
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,110
Whatever way you argue the semantics, you said Alesha's comment showed who she really is. I still stand by the fact that it's a tad unfair to base your view of her personality on one frustrated comment.
I can accept that (you are entitled to your viewpoint) - but not your suggestion that I implied she is a terrible person. I don't find her likeable, but unlikeable and terrible have very different meaning: for confirmation consult a dictionary.

You're arguing the semantics to prove an invalid point.
Ignazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 22:31
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
I can accept that (you are entitled to your viewpoint) - but not your suggestion that I implied she is a terrible person. I don't find her likeable, but unlikeable and terrible have very different meaning: for confirmation consult a dictionary.

You're arguing the semantics to prove an invalid point.
It depends whether you take what I said at face value rather than other explanation. Sarcasm? Exaggeration?

Which is rather the whole point of this thing - Alesha is being crucified for one comment when her reasons and feelings behind it are clearly open to interpretation. Too many seem far too eager to think the worst instead of being more pragmatic.
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51.