I think SCD is going to need a change of direction to avoid the rut some people think it's getting into.
So, my thought on this was; why not do exactly what is done now, but with non-celebrities taking part? (And no, all you smartasses, not the kind of 'non-celebs' we have now).
You could do exactly the same as X Factor and hold auditions for the first two/three weeks around the country, then a 'boot camp' and then select your final X number.
PROS OF NON-CELEBS:
1. No salaries to pay, so more money to spend
2. It would be directly comparable with X Factor, which is what the Beeb seem to want
3. You'd get way more 'journey' stories
4. No C-listers trying to get noticed. A total unknown is much more likely to get a sympathetic reaction than a vaguely recognisable club-haunting chav.
CONS OF NON-CELEBS:
1. Nobody would know what to make of people initially, so the betting industry might be affected.
2. Would people care less about non-celeb couplings?
3. The pros might not like it.
So, what do people reckon? Would it work? Would you watch? And would you audition?
So, my thought on this was; why not do exactly what is done now, but with non-celebrities taking part? (And no, all you smartasses, not the kind of 'non-celebs' we have now).
You could do exactly the same as X Factor and hold auditions for the first two/three weeks around the country, then a 'boot camp' and then select your final X number.
PROS OF NON-CELEBS:
1. No salaries to pay, so more money to spend
2. It would be directly comparable with X Factor, which is what the Beeb seem to want
3. You'd get way more 'journey' stories
4. No C-listers trying to get noticed. A total unknown is much more likely to get a sympathetic reaction than a vaguely recognisable club-haunting chav.
CONS OF NON-CELEBS:
1. Nobody would know what to make of people initially, so the betting industry might be affected.
2. Would people care less about non-celeb couplings?
3. The pros might not like it.
So, what do people reckon? Would it work? Would you watch? And would you audition?