Originally Posted by *Laura*:
“I've no doubt that Laila was in pain but, I have to say (even when I saw her with an ice pack over her boot) I didn't question the seriousness of her injury until Anton said "I told you" when their name was called out. I would hate to think they "duped" the GBP because they couldn't do a dance but, something doesn't sit right with me about their behaviour last night.”
“I've no doubt that Laila was in pain but, I have to say (even when I saw her with an ice pack over her boot) I didn't question the seriousness of her injury until Anton said "I told you" when their name was called out. I would hate to think they "duped" the GBP because they couldn't do a dance but, something doesn't sit right with me about their behaviour last night.”
Sorry, *laura*, to pick on your post, but this is EXACTLY what I mean when I say why don't people take things at face value? Strictly has an absolutely consistent and frequent history of the sympathy vote. In fact, it's one of the things that gets discussed on here ad infinitum.
The obvious, face value, interpretation of Anton's remark is that this is what he meant: the public will save you in a sympathy vote after something like this - and it's true!
Why this means that a) someone would fake an injury, b) the BBC would go along with it and c) a "co-conspirator" would be so stupid as to remark on it whilst on live TV, is just an analysis too far, don't you think?
The simple answer is very often the truthful one: Laila hurt her ankle, how seriously doesn't really matter; a combination of panic and pain set in and she cried on live TV; the public felt sympathy for her and sent her enough votes to keep her in; her partner said 'I told you that's what would happen' since he's had seven series of Strictly experience and seen it all before.



