|
||||||||
Brucie, or not Brucie: that is the question. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11,780
|
Brucie, or not Brucie: that is the question.
Is the show better with him or without him ?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,441
|
Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 20,426
|
I didn't miss him. Could have done without Ronnie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 738
|
Definitely better without him. He's the reason I record it, so that I can fast forward through his bits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Hawthorns
Posts: 2,502
|
Definitely without, good to watch tonight without the usual "jokes" and his constant attempts to make it the "Bruce Forsythe" show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 989
|
Totally agree with Daisy M. Tess delivered many of Bruce's set lines, but from her they sounded genuine rather than autocued. Claudia had a absolute home game with the dancers, they clearly mostly adore her, and it's mutual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a Whittle Wonderland!
Posts: 37,511
|
Sorry to go against the grain but, I missed him. I felt the show was very dis-jointed and seemed to lack a certain amount of sparkle. It was a strange show tonight and I didn't really enjoy it. I can't put my finger on it so, I can only think it was because Bruce wasn't there steadying the helm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
|
To be honest, the way it's done now, it looks like Tess can do the front stage bit perfectly adequately.
I love Bruce - he's a dancer, and he's committed to dancing. But the way the format is done, he's not really allowed to do much beyond read an autocue at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 225
|
There was some sort of Einsteinian gravitational effect on time. Minus the greater gravitational effect of Brucie's showman schtick, time seemed to run a lot faster to me. Not sure if that's the way round it's supposed to work, but it did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
It felt like throughout the whole episode they tried to stall to fill in for his jokes. I think I missed him, but that might just be my reaction to a terrible episode.
Only highlight for me was Laila being saved.. I would love for Claudia + Tess to takeover the show themselves. Tess did alot better when she didn't try to play the glamorous assistant. She is capable. Claudia got herself together and was able to refer to things she said on ITT which I thought was nice. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Without. Tess and Claudia did a great job - it's just a shame they desperately tried to shoehorn Ronnie Corbett (who I like) in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
|
I thought Tess was nice but bland and didn't seem as assured as Bruce at running a live show. She did an okay job but I think long term it would work better with someone who displays a little more personality in their style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: No idea.
Posts: 9,353
|
Without. both Tess and Claudia did a good job, and no cringe factor, except Ronnie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 963
|
I was relieved to hear we would be spared Brucie's hilarious jokes this week, only for them to roll out the only man in showbiz more doddery than Bruce himself to extend the run of completely unfunny quips to 6 years and counting.
I have a horrible feeling that when they finally put Bruce out to pasture they will get Graham Norton on in his place
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 113
|
without Bruce it seemed more slick tonight and less of a drag between dances and the judges didnt get shouted over whilst giving their opinions,
Tess was ok but i do wish she would stop the gurning and talking to the viewers as if were all children, Claudia was great i thought someone who loves the dancers and what shes doing and it shows, as much as i love Ronnie C i still dont see why he was there either have him presenting properly or not at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,211
|
Without for me too (sorry Bruce)
I've never been a fan of Tess but i thought she was great tonight. Shes obviously much more comfortable and natural with the auto cued front of house job whereas Claudia was fantastic as the spontaneous back stage host who has got an obvious bond with the dancers. Tess and Claudia permanently would be ideal
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 525
|
Without, didn't miss him and his cringeworthy jokes at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Pool Of Life
Posts: 15,877
|
Have to say, without. And say again, without.
![]() Tess did a very good job (I'd earlier doubted her capability) and I think that was down to her not just being Brucie's stooge. She had a chance (under unfortunate circumstances) to shine and prove herself. Her whole demeanour was different - she seemed comfortable and in control. Claudia, it goes without saying, was an absolute diamond. Ronnie - I love. But hey, what was all that about - not needed. The show was in good hands with Claudia and Tess. He brought nothing to it - best he was just in the audience as 'Brucies's Special Friend' to say a few nice lines and leave it at that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 18,505
|
Quote:
Sorry to go against the grain but, I missed him. I felt the show was very dis-jointed and seemed to lack a certain amount of sparkle. It was a strange show tonight and I didn't really enjoy it. I can't put my finger on it so, I can only think it was because Bruce wasn't there steadying the helm.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 353
|
I love Brucie! Strictly won't be the same without him...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 569
|
Quote:
Is the show better with him or without him ?
I didn't have to fastforward once. I loved Claudia, she was great. Bruce believes in all his own hype when really, his jokes are dated in the prehistoric era, he fluffs his lines, can't read the autocue, stumbles and mumbles from one gaff to the next. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11,836
|
Alas, poor Brucie! I knew him when he was vaguely amusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 472
|
Without. And keep Claudia in the Tesspit too. She's much better!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,715
|
For me, I love the Tess / Claudia combo. The dancers all make a point of it being a strictly "Family" and rather than replace Bruce with a step-dad I think we'd all be happier with just Mum and the mad, batty aunt. The BBC should think v-e-r-y carefully on who should replace Bruce, and what a mistake Ronnie was.
The one thing Bruce has that nobody can take away from him is his ability to control and work the audience. Tess doesn't have this (as yet) and that's the thing I missed him for. There were occasions where the audience wouldn't be quiet enough for us to allow Tess to be heard above them. Bruce would either use timing to wait until they had subsided, or use his audience working skills to shut them up one way or another. I don't know of many people that DO have that vital ability. Certainly not a lot of the comedians people are suggesting. But I think given chance, Tess would shine and obviously Claudia is such a hit they would be mad to not use her! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Devon
Posts: 8,086
|
without definitely, Tess and Claudia did a great job, i think Tess could shine given a chance she did really well and you cannot help but love Claudia dont know why the levered Ronnie Corbett in there for
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:38.




