Originally Posted by
Force Ten:
“I thought Tess did a brilliant job and it just shows what a (much) younger presenter can do. It's not a comedy show and you don't necessarily need someone who knows about dance. A half decent professional presenter has just shown us exactly how bad Bruce is now and it's time to put all these geriatric guys to rest. And I speak as a geriatric myself lol.
”
Quite the opposite, I'd have thought. Think back to the early days of
Ready, Steady, Cook! when it was presented by Fern Britton. It worked with her as a presenter because she didn't know much about cooking. I haven't been able to watch it since Ainsley Harriott took over. He's ok as a chef but he doesn't work as the presenter because he can't refrain from interfering.
Using the same logic, a presenter who can't dance, who isn't a comedian and who would keep the focus on the contestants rather than themselves would be ideal. I know some people found Tess a bit bland on Saturday but if she had a script that was tailored to her instead of to Bruce, she'd probably do very well on a long-term basis. At least it wasn't all about her on Saturday. Brucie is a legend but he's a legend who should retire.
Originally Posted by samiskim:
“If you have to have a male presenter - then the list is endless. Favourites would be:
Paul O'Grady (so funny)
Graham Norton (totally irreverent)
Aled Jones (experienced presenter who has the same knowledge of dance as one of the judges)
Julian Clary (for the same reason)”
Aled Jones or
Chris Hollins would get my vote. A presenter would be better than a comedian: much as I like them all, I've a feeling that none of Paul O'Grady, Graham Norton or Julian Clary would work, because the show would end up being too much about them. What I liked on Saturday was it really felt that the focus was more on the contestants than it does when Brucie's busy making bad jokes.