My old Pace Twin box was getting unreliable, so I replaced it with a 9300T, largely on the basis of good reports on it's picture quality.
First reaction is that the Humax may be more capable than the Pace, but the usability is not 5 years better, it's better in places, worse in others (the Guide shows a lot fewer channels for example).
Anyway on to the main point- The picture quality is not good at all. Over RGB SCART the Humax picture is more contrasty and saturated than the Pace. Over HDMI it's even more extreme. Solid colours (especially red) are so overcooked they "block" into solid oversaturated patches with no visible detail, and skin tones range from pale magenta to deep orange without ever passing through a shade that looks it might have ever graced a living human being.
The problem is there are no picture controls for the HDMI output on the Humax at all!
My Samsung LE40N TV has been quite carefully set up (from my S-Video DVD player) using Digital Video Essentials (DVE). The Pace box on SCART produced a good picture with a decent range of contrast and balanced colour.
The TV unfortunately doesn't give me separate picture controls for each input, so to make the Humax look halfway decent I am going to have to back off the contrast and saturation so far my DVDs will all look as if they are drawn in pastels.
Sadly it looks as if Humax have fallen foul of the "Dixons Demo Effect". I.e. they want to make sure a casual customer sees RGB SCART as "obviously" better than composite, and HDMI as "obviously" better than SCART, so they ramp up the saturation and contrast on the latter interfaces to progressively more unreasonable levels.
Has anyone raised this with Humax, and is there any likelihod of getting some Picture Qaulity controls on the box?, because at this rate returning the Humax for something else (I don't know what) would be a lot cheaper than replacing my 3 year old TV just to get per-input picture controls.
First reaction is that the Humax may be more capable than the Pace, but the usability is not 5 years better, it's better in places, worse in others (the Guide shows a lot fewer channels for example).
Anyway on to the main point- The picture quality is not good at all. Over RGB SCART the Humax picture is more contrasty and saturated than the Pace. Over HDMI it's even more extreme. Solid colours (especially red) are so overcooked they "block" into solid oversaturated patches with no visible detail, and skin tones range from pale magenta to deep orange without ever passing through a shade that looks it might have ever graced a living human being.
The problem is there are no picture controls for the HDMI output on the Humax at all!
My Samsung LE40N TV has been quite carefully set up (from my S-Video DVD player) using Digital Video Essentials (DVE). The Pace box on SCART produced a good picture with a decent range of contrast and balanced colour.
The TV unfortunately doesn't give me separate picture controls for each input, so to make the Humax look halfway decent I am going to have to back off the contrast and saturation so far my DVDs will all look as if they are drawn in pastels.
Sadly it looks as if Humax have fallen foul of the "Dixons Demo Effect". I.e. they want to make sure a casual customer sees RGB SCART as "obviously" better than composite, and HDMI as "obviously" better than SCART, so they ramp up the saturation and contrast on the latter interfaces to progressively more unreasonable levels.
Has anyone raised this with Humax, and is there any likelihod of getting some Picture Qaulity controls on the box?, because at this rate returning the Humax for something else (I don't know what) would be a lot cheaper than replacing my 3 year old TV just to get per-input picture controls.

