Originally Posted by indigomoon:
“Your response was indeed rude. I thank you for allowing me to have my own opinions very kind.”
Did you not read what I just said? You called Icarus17 rude, I responded to your reply to them. Then you responded to me and said I was being rude again. I never said that my response wasn't rude, only that I was not the poster you originally replied to.
Originally Posted by indigomoon:
“It is indeed mathematically possible for him to win but it depends on the judges not weighting the board against him ( I believe they will ). You would prefer COLA fans to remain in blissful ignorance of the fact that public vote alone is less than likely to carry him to the final? I want Cola fans to know their votes are likely wasted unless they start kicking up a fuss now.”
There is a difference between what is likely and what is possible. What I have taken issue with up until now is you presenting a lie about what is possible as a fact. What I will now take issue with is a separate issue: how do you know what is likely? What are you basing that on?
The system will not be changed because it is possible for Chris to avoid the dance-off. The only precedent for changing the system was last year and that was because it was impossible for Tom to avoid the dance-off. That is not the case this year, so the system will not be changed.
Originally Posted by indigomoon:
“If you were friendly to Chris's win you would see this more readily I feel and would not take issue with my approach.
Cola fans keep voting but also eye the tactical strategy and make your opinions known to the production team now not when it is to late.”
I vote for Chris. I want him to win. In fact, I stand to win 170 quid if he does, so I am biased in exactly the opposite way to what you imply. Putting that aside, again you did not read my post. I said that what I took issue with was your statement that it is not possible for Chris to win, which is not true. I take no issue with the discussion of how the system could be fairer, because that is a matter of opinion, not fact.