• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
A Farce if Hollins wins - the show lacks enough credibility as it is
<<
<
1 of 9
>>
>
sarahca
30-11-2009
We had Mr Showman winning last year and Osmond won on the US show. Its all getting so predictable. If Hollins wins it will set such a pattern that I can see people really losing interest and switching off next year.
reclinewithme
30-11-2009
Credibility? Strictly? Oh please! It's just abit of fun.
Servalan
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by sarahca:
“We had Mr Showman winning last year and Osmond won on the US show. Its all getting so predictable. If Hollins wins it will set such a pattern that I can see people really losing interest and switching off next year.”

What do you think it is? A dancing competition?

If so, you are clearly watching the wrong show.

Nice try to start another anti-Team Cola thread. We now have an outbreak of these. I wonder why ... Some people realising their favourites might be threatened?

Showmanship is very much what Strictly is about. If you don't like that, you don't have to watch.
yohinnchild
30-11-2009
I dont think he's any worse than Darren Gough who won, Chris Parker and Julian Clary got to the finals and they were worse.

John Sargeant had a big big chance of winning before withdrawing.

If the public vote for them to win then thats the winner the majority want
welwynrose
30-11-2009
That's ok it was a farce when Tom won it last year
cosmic dancer
30-11-2009
I prefer someone winning who can dance quite well, has great chemistry with their partner and shows how much fun they're having, to someone who is a little better at dancing but who is privileged and overmarked by the judges. True, the audience shouldn't vote for people like John Sargeant and Joe Calzaghe instead of for better dancers, but I still prefer the audience's favourite winning to the judges' favourite winning. They should be impartial!
Miriyo
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by welwynrose:
“That's ok it was a farce when Tom won it last year”

If it is supposed to be about the best dancer, then the public shouldn't be invited to vote.

On the other hand, William Hill gave me 33/1 on Chris Hollins to win when the series first started so I'm torn.
The_abbott
30-11-2009
Tom won because he was the public favourite. Thats you and me. Those that watch the programme and vote.

Its not about who is the best dancer, it is who can dance well and entertain as well. This is why some pro's go for the more showy dances.

If Cola wins then good for them as I have enjoyed their partnership. I never thought I would like Ola. I thought the charleston was great.

Ricky & Nat - too serious
Ali & Brian - too boring
Laila & Anton - too moany
Vodka_Drinka
30-11-2009
Oh my god, shock horror its another Chris bashing thread! I dont think there are any other anti Chris threads on here are they?:yawn:

I have to say these Ali and Brian fans are a spiteful bunch. Its really putting me off them as a couple.
Jan2555*GG*
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“
Ricky & Nat - too serious
Ali & Brian - too boring
Laila & Anton - too moany”

thats made me laugh.
Idiotgirle
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by Vodka_Drinka:
“Oh my god, shock horror its another Chris bashing thread! I dont think there are any other anti Chris threads on here are they?:yawn:

I have to say these Ali and Brian fans are a spiteful bunch. Its really putting me off them as a couple.”

What's this about you not seeing Cola fans not bashing others?:yawn:
Vodka_Drinka
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by Idiotgirle:
“What's this about you not seeing Cola fans not bashing others?:yawn:”

How is that bashing them? Im not starting spiteful threads attacking the way Ali dances or the way she behaves. Its their fans who are irritating me.
Idiotgirle
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by Vodka_Drinka:
“How is that bashing them? Im not starting spiteful threads attacking the way Ali dances or the way she behaves. Its their fans who are irritating me.”

Welcome to Non-Cola world!
bobbla
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by Vodka_Drinka:
“Oh my god, shock horror its another Chris bashing thread! I dont think there are any other anti Chris threads on here are they?:yawn:

I have to say these Ali and Brian fans are a spiteful bunch. Its really putting me off them as a couple.”

Well that in itself is a spiteful thing to say. I've never bashed Chris or started a thread on him and none of the regular posters on Ali and Brians appreciation thread have either
Jan2555*GG*
30-11-2009
I think its quite funny all the anti Chris threads that have just emerged. I think fans of some of the others thought his support would fade away and now they are beginning to panic. So we have had several threads trying to convince people that voting for Chris is a waste of time because of his potential position on the board, or that he dances like Norman Wisdom etc etc etc.

Yes it might be more difficult for Chris and Ola to get to the final because they are generally lower on the board than the others but its certainly not impossible and who is to say the BBC wont suddenly decide to have the 3 couple final, even the BBC are not stupid enough to realise that Chris and Ola are a huge potential draw for the series finale.

In the grand scheme of things whoever wins Strictly is really very unimportant and has rarely been won by the person that was the 'best' dancer as that term is very subjective anyway
trunkster
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Tom won because he was the public favourite. Thats you and me. Those that watch the programme and vote.

Its not about who is the best dancer, it is who can dance well and entertain as well. This is why some pro's go for the more showy dances.

If Cola wins then good for them as I have enjoyed their partnership. I never thought I would like Ola. I thought the charleston was great.

Ricky & Nat - too serious
Ali & Brian - too boring
Laila & Anton - too moany”

I'd like to make Laila moan
Shappy
30-11-2009
Tom winning was not a farce. He was a pretty competant dancer, perhaps until the semi-final when Rachel and Lisa outdanced him.

Chris, in comparison, is much further behind the two front runners in his year (Ali and Ricky). I still don't think him winning will equate to a farce though, but then again, I don't actually believe he will win.
Vodka_Drinka
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by bobbla:
“Well that in itself is a spiteful thing to say. I've never bashed Chris or started a thread on him and none of the regular posters on Ali and Brians appreciation thread have either ”

Its not a spiteful thing to say at all, though I do think comments calling Chris "cheesy" and mocking his dancing are incrediably nasty and smacking of bitterness and sour grapes.

And where did I say you personally started threads attacking him? I didnt, but a quick look through the posting history of some the people being nasty to Chris shows that they are indeed supporters of Ali.
Servalan
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by trunkster:
“I'd like to make Laila moan”

You could always try tripping her up on the stairs ...
frightful_oik
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by bobbla:
“Well that in itself is a spiteful thing to say. I've never bashed Chris or started a thread on him and none of the regular posters on Ali and Brians appreciation thread have either ”

Nor me.
katkim
30-11-2009
If it were a dance competition, there's no need for a public vote and yes, Ricky or Ali deserve to win. SCD is about learning to dance and the joy of dancing, the effort put in, a good attitude to whatever the show throws at you, as well as seeing partnerships grow. As such, the show won't lack credibility to me if Chris won.
magic_fingers
30-11-2009
i would rather someone win who has a great partnership made obvious improvement and is enjoying their time on the show like chris and ola or even ali and brian in my opinion ricky if anything has been going backwards and not improved that much since the beginning
Jan2555*GG*
30-11-2009
Originally Posted by magic_fingers:
“i would rather someone win who has a great partnership made obvious improvement and is enjoying their time on the show like chris and ola or even ali and brian in my opinion ricky if anything has been going backwards and not improved that much since the beginning”

Your feelings would be backed up by Ali taking over from Ricky as the betting favourite to win and Chris's odd shortening too.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/strictly...ctly-prog.html
holly_oa
30-11-2009
I;m tired of the coco the clown act from him.
claire2281
30-11-2009
I think I can say that out of the 7 series only once (possibly twice) has the best dancer actually won.

You've got to be more than a good technical dancer to win - you've got to entertain and have a good partnership too.

And I certainly wouldn't say Chris is any worse than Darren Gough.
<<
<
1 of 9
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map