• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Are we heading for a two couple final again or will.
pickledwalnuts
04-12-2009
The BBC decide to put the three semi finalists straight through,just like last year.

I know it was done because of the balls up in the scoring.

Thank you for any info.
thenetworkbabe
05-12-2009
Logicaly they should have a bye week but the problem last year was that they then had to announce the vote leader at the start of the final because there were votes to carry over.

If they have two shows scheduled now they seem stuck with someone going or there's little point to show 2. If they give show 2 the second dance to give it a purpose they have a problem how and when they tell people that there will be no one going. Too early (in the first show) and people will turn over, too late and people will feel mislead. Show 1 with both dances and then a longer voting interval before the result in show 2 is dramatic. Show 1 with a dance and then show 2 with a dance and then the voting period is a recipe for losing people's attention.
See
05-12-2009
I've already said this somewhere but i'm wondering if they're planning to put them all through tonight, I think the BBC know it works better with a 3 couple final, they could easily carry the scores across to next week, it's been done on DWTS
StrictlyRed
05-12-2009
Originally Posted by See:
“I've already said this somewhere but i'm wondering if they're planning to put them all through tonight, I think the BBC know it works better with a 3 couple final, they could easily carry the scores across to next week, it's been done on DWTS”

A 3 couple final would be preferable, but the BBC should have done something when Jade pulled out. They have chosen to ignore their own rules, and two couples have been eliminated since then, so would it be unfair to them? I did contact the BBC a week ago about the 3 couple final, but didn't get a reply from them.
MARTYM8
05-12-2009
Originally Posted by StrictlyRed:
“A 3 couple final would be preferable, but the BBC should have done something when Jade pulled out. They have chosen to ignore their own rules, and two couples have been eliminated since then, so would it be unfair to them? I did contact the BBC a week ago about the 3 couple final, but didn't get a reply from them.”

As I suggested on another thread next week the public vote should be decide which of the 5 judges go through to the final. The final 3 dancers should just dance for the fun of it - a warm up to the final

Vote to evict Alesha *****....01

Vote to evict Bruno *****....02

Vote to evict Len *****....03

etc etc
Fredless Ginger
05-12-2009
Don't they usually give out the numbers after the judge's scores (telling us not to call until later)?

Unless maybe that will come after the second dance.
MARTYM8
05-12-2009
If the BBC are sensible they will surprise us next Saturday by saying all are safe and all are through to the final.

Even if the judges don't want it the BBC know a final with Chris and Ola will be more of a ratings winner.

But when were the Beeb sensible........
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map