• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
2 questions - i'm confused
flowers786
06-12-2009
why was there 5 people judging??

and why were the results show on later?
DavidJames
06-12-2009
Originally Posted by flowers786:
“why was there 5 people judging??

and why were the results show on later?”

Loving your work with those two sentences
Jan2555*GG*
06-12-2009
Because they just were really.
MARTYM8
06-12-2009
Later results show due to ratings i.e. avoiding a clash with the X factor.

5 judges - don't know why?
tabithakitten
06-12-2009
Originally Posted by MARTYM8:
“Later results show due to ratings i.e. avoiding a clash with the X factor.

5 judges - don't know why?”

Because the bbc have a policy of, "If it's cracked, smash it to pieces. And then jump on the bits."
Vic
06-12-2009
Originally Posted by tabithakitten:
“Because the bbc have a policy of, "If it's cracked, smash it to pieces. And then jump on the bits."”



So true!
Rorschach
06-12-2009
I'm working on the assumption that Darcy approached someone ro other at a party saying she was a huge fan of SCD, would love to do something with the show and had a large window in December.

Then the production team worked out how she could be shoehorned in.

Bonnie96
06-12-2009
Originally Posted by flowers786:
“why was there 5 people judging??

and why were the results show on later?”

Are you Alesha?
(Sorry )

Another judge needed to be brought in so Len couldn't be blamed (lynched ) through having the deciding vote.
sequinned thong
06-12-2009
Originally Posted by flowers786:
“why was there 5 people judging??

and why were the results show on later?”


Ahh ha, you are clearly Alesha Dixon in guise
Seymour
06-12-2009
Originally Posted by flowers786:
“why was there 5 people judging??

and why were the results show on later?”


I haven't the foggiest, flower
soulmate61
06-12-2009
Originally Posted by flowers786:
“why was there 5 people judging??

and why were the results show on later?”

It's all to do with astrology.

First Mystic Meg said 5 was a better number than 4.
Then Russell Grant said 9:40 was a propitious time with the evening star in the ascendant.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map