Originally Posted by Technophiles:
“Why would Cola fans stop supporting Chris now?
I just think, if you don't have a favourite by now, you're not likely to vote a lot over the next few weeks. My feeling is that the result doesn't really depend on floating voters at this stage, it depends on how many supporters you have that will vote multiple times. The outcome might be different if they only counted unique votes.”
“Why would Cola fans stop supporting Chris now?

I just think, if you don't have a favourite by now, you're not likely to vote a lot over the next few weeks. My feeling is that the result doesn't really depend on floating voters at this stage, it depends on how many supporters you have that will vote multiple times. The outcome might be different if they only counted unique votes.”
Paradoxically I believe Cola would have fared much better with a dance-off in place for Saturday. The fear of eviction and hatred of judges (one common enemy uniting disparate factions) would have forged a mighty defensive army of voters (death before eviction).
With the dance-off now lifted there is no longer the unifying spectre of hostile judges, and a possibility of complacency settling in, always a danger for the frontrunner.
If Ricky is below par on the night while Ali puts in a (probable) scintillating four 10 waltz, then the penny could drop for Ricky voters that the only way Ricky can go into the Final is via:
------ Ali first on 2+3 = aggregate 5,
Ricky second on 3+1 = aggregate 4,
Cola evicted on 1+2 = aggregate 3.
If Ricky's army tactically marches over to Ali (possibly after a hint dropped by Ricky to camera), then the game could be up for a fascinating denouement. Sure Cola supporters will vote multiple times, but cannot Ricky and Ali fans in their sorrow and despair also vote multiple times?
Facing such a lastminute alliance Cola could be cooked.




