Originally Posted by Strictly_Irish:
“Because in latin the key is not technique, it's letting yourself go and showing personality.
Chris has this in abundance and so his Latin is more enjoyable than Ali's. Ali's routines are "neat".
Considering the fact the judges mark Ali on "potential" rather than what she actually produces, the scores mean nothing.”
I'm not saying Ali doesn't have shortcomings in the her Latin - she does.
However, so does Chris.
What I found bizarre was the fact that the original poster was claiming that Ali couldn't do Latin and, therefore, didn't deserve to win while claiming that Chris could do both when he has as much of a problem with technique as Ali does with performance. The counter-argument really didn't work for me.
This is not meant to decry either Ali or Chris. I think they both have lots to recommend them. However, it doesn't mean I am blind to their faults; none of the finalists are perfect as Sid pointed out. Nonetheless, they are all very good in very different ways.