Originally Posted by frightful_oik:
“Seriously? Both Ali's dances were better than Chris's in my opinion. Far more content and better executed sans gurn.”
Ali's AS was indeed much better than Chris's rhumba, but it wasn't deserving of 10s. It seemed to be riddled with slight pauses (maybe it was supposed to look like that but it looked wrong), turns that Ali finished long after Brian, and there was that bit where both her hands were stretched above her head and wobbling all over the place that looked like she'd forgotten what to do and had thrown in some ballet. I though perhaps a couple of 8s and three 9s would have been fairer.
On the other hand Chris's AT was far better than Ali's AT, and Ali's AT was worse than Chris's rhumba. Ali's had little content, no feeling, and was poorly executed except for the lift at the end which I felt was more than matched by the one Chris did. Ali's AT was 7s at most for me.
So for me there is no way Ali was twelve points better than Chris over the two dances (was it twelve? it was of that order). Maybe four points at most would have been ok.
However in SCD you often see the judges being generous with the lesser dancers who are at the top of their game, and more severe with the better dancers who have an off day. So you often see what seems to be a much better dance get the same score. I don't think its 'right' but it happens all the time. Had that applied today it could have been even closer.
Last edited by grunson : 12-12-2009 at 20:51