• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
Simon blames Dannii on Stacey's departure
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
Fudd
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by KatrinaK:
“So much truth in this.

Joe hasn't performed first since rock week which was a very long time ago. He was due to perform first. However Stacey drew the short straw. Added with his obvious desire of a male winner, the odds were stacked up against Stacey and the rest of the girls.”

Stacey performed first....against Strictly Come Dancing which was concluding. By the time Olly came on, the contest had finished and a filler Jive was being danced. When Joe started his first song Strictly had fimished.
tommygunner
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Lucylock:
“Cheryl gave Lloyd and Rikki awful songs”

So awful that Lloyd lasted about a month longer than anyone expected him to...
Since Yesterday
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by superstar111:
“But why did Lucie get put in the sing off in the first place? It took Dannii too long to find her comfort zone really, and she just didn't know what to do with her IMO, the same with Rachel.”

Because the song was poor and not familiar to much of the audience (although in all honesty she had a few problems during her performance, which is odd because it's hardly difficult to sing). Simon was questioning her performances and saying that her songs weren't age-relevant, etc. But the two previous themes were rock and big band, both of which she did well with. In fact I don't think you'll find many people who didn't rate My Funny Valentine as one of, if not the best performance during Big Band week. The fact is that Lucie had been doing just fine, until Simon stuck his oar in. Remember that he liked both her performance and the song that week, despite the fact that she'd been far better for the two previous shows. Still, Lucie evidently likes the song too, given that she's been performing it in her PAs since leaving the show.

As for Rachel, the public simply never took to her. The fact that she had very little coverage prior to the live shows can't have helped, but both Proud Mary and One were excellent performances and great song choices. The fact that she was eliminated after what I'd imagine most would agree was one of the best performances that week (Lucie was her only real competition for me) is beyond Dannii's control.

Originally Posted by superstar111:
“I think Simon's done a good job with his acts to be fair, yeah they were in the bottom, but he's given them good song choices and stuff, as much as I hate to admit it.

Cheryl's been awful too. Lloyd and Rikki were poetntial finalists but were totally ruined by her

Louis to be fair was really good with John and Edward!”

I think there's plenty of evidence to the contrary. He changed Jamie's song the night before the show twice, and he did the same thing to Danyl at least once. He gave Danyl And I Am Telling You I'm Not Going and I Didn't Know My Own Strength - the latter being an unreleased song that nobody knew. Danyl expressed concern that he was being given 'girls' songs' every week himself, and he also had issues with Simon's solo standing ovations (he got all excited because Danyl climbed a bloody ladder one week). I think it's widely regarded here that Simon's reaction to Danyl's performances played a significant part in his apparent unpopularity.

A Fool In Love, Betwitched (neither very well-known at all) and Come Together (quite probably the most unsuitable song in the show's entire history) were all poor song choices (kudos to Olly for pulling off A Fool In Love and Bewitched, though). Fastlove was another very poor choice, and that was the week Olly found himself in the bottom two.

Neither Lloyd nor Rikki were ever even close to being "potential finalists". Lloyd was the weakest solo act by an absolute mile this year, hence the fact that he found himself in the bottom two twice and then eliminated with the lowest number of votes. I actually had a soft spot for Rikki, but in truth he was better in previous years and wasn't great from his audition onwards. He didn't deserve to be eliminated quite so early for me, but he was never going to make the final in a million years. His unpopularity here seems to have been reflected with the wider audience, and even the press took issue with the crying / 'unusual' eyebrow.

He may have been supportive, particularly when the studio audience and some of the other judges were at their most vociferous. But the real credit there (if such a term can be considered relevant) belongs to the backing vocalists and Brian Friedman.

Originally Posted by rivercity_rules:
“Look how far Louis took Jedward

Simon has managed to get Olly to the final, god only knows how

and Cheryl has a finalist out of the weakest (By Far) category.

Dannii had 3 potential finalists, ruined Rachel in week one (Why dress her as Rihanna then make her sing Robbie? Idiotic choice)

scuppered Lucie's chances with a song noone knows

then tried to turn Stacey into Leona which just wasn't possible.

If she had spent more time picking good songs for them instead of trying to be their best mate

she would have lost one act tonight and still had two competing tomorrow.

Last year was the same, Rachel never stood a chance with the song choices and she chose Daniel fgs!

Then we have her to blame for Leon too.”

Largely due to support from primary school kids, and people who took up the 'vote for the worst' cause of ruining the show.

Olly's personality and charisma got Olly to the final.

The boys were hardly weaker than the groups, and the fact that the most consistent act made the final isn't at all relative to the weakness of his peers.

No she didn't. It quite evidently wasn't going to work for Rachel, no matter how well she performed. I thought she was fantastic for weeks three and four, but the votes simply weren't there despite good song choices. I don't see what else Dannii could've done, other than employ a team of people to block vote. She intervened and revamped Rachel's image as early as she could. The initial makeovers aren't down to the mentors, and that's pretty obvious from the rather generic look (which was even more apparent last year). But Rachel had the Rihanna thing going on before the live shows even started. What was Dannii supposed to do, overrule the backstage team and plonk a wig on her head from the outset?

If anyone "scuppered Lucie's chances", it was Simon. That was the sort of song he thought she should've been singing, and he's on record saying that meetings were called because he didn't approve of various things, such as song choices. Whether Dannii's her mentor or not, it's Simon's show. And if he starts giving her grief about it then there's little that she can do. Even without those meetings, he was giving Lucie a hard time on the live shows. And whether we like it or not, a huge number of people believe every last word he ever says.

That point is really quite absurd. There are no comparisons whatsoever between Stacey and Leona beyond gender, whether real or implied. Cowell is the absolute master of tosh, but even for him that entire quote is simply ludicrous.

I think Dannii's song choices more than measure up to the other mentors'. Take a look back through Simon's choices from this year's shows, for example.

That quite simply was never going to happen. Joe was always going to be in the final this year, regardless of how good the girls may have been.

Rachel Hylton "never stood a chance" because she wasn't at all popular. Both her past actions and poor attitude counted against her, and in reality she lacked versatility. We all know that Daniel was poor. But James and Louise were never going to make it, and Daniel already had a fanbase (or sob story, if you prefer) that Suzie didn't.

So hang on - she's at fault because she didn't achieve the impossible by getting all three girls into the final. But she's also at fault for mentoring a shy, naive lad into the most popular act throughout the series and then to victory in the final on top?

Originally Posted by superstar111:
“Why did everyone think they would have gone sooner?

Ruth was in the bottom two week two and five, Rachel was in the bottom two week four, six and seven and Daniel was in the bottom two week three and six. This means that Dannii had ana ct in the bottom every week bar the first one, which isn't an achievement.”

Because it was regarded as a weak category. She took all of them much further than most predicted.

Keeping all three acts from what was perceived as XF5's weakest category, until Louis and Simon were down to one act each and Cheryl was down to two, was a massive achievement.

Originally Posted by superstar111:
“Are your real? Rachel was hyped to the max, as was Daniel and his sob story (admittedly he wasn't that good either). She didn't make Ruth a contender either, she was loved on this forum, but she was NEVER a contender in real life.”

Being "hyped" is not necessarily a mark of popularity, or quality. Of course she was "a contender". Why on earth do you think Virgin/EMI signed her?

Originally Posted by friendlyguy2:
“She thought that Lucie doing rock chick performances in the early without having connected with the audience would get her to the semi final and further.

It didn't work the audience voted in greater number for Jedward who were vocally worse than Lucie but better in terms of charisma and audience connection.”

What a daft thing to do during Rock week, huh? Or are you classing This Is Me as 'rock'? And how were one or two performances ever going to carry her for another month?

That's the most novel use of the term "charisma" I think I've ever seen.

Originally Posted by friendlyguy2:
“She should have given Lucie songs that enabled her to develop a connection with the audience like in her first audition not change her hair and get her singing rock chick songs. A great menotor would have realised that Buble was not the best choice of duet for Stacey given the duets the other two acts had.

Why she could not bring herself to say that Stacey deserved to win particularly after Stacey had sung "Who wants to live forever" tonight is a mystery. It would have been a gamble with the other judges and their acts last songs but it would have been worth the gamble with the viewers. Danni clearly didn't think Stacey was that good not as good as Joe and no better than Olly.”

We know Simon's opinion already, but what's yours? Her hair has/had nothing to do with Dannii, nor does she get to pick which guest artists appear on the show.

I don't see any "mystery". Complacency earns you nothing.
broadshoulder
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Lucylock:
“No, Simon ruined her chances by being a manipulative man, going on about how he wanted a male to win”

Can you provide a solid example where he has on TV actually said this?

Or are you just smearing him with misyogny because the show hasnt gone the way you want it too?
Gold_Fish
13-12-2009
I don't think so. Dannii worked hard with Stacey and if she did ruin her chances, it wouldn't have been done on the sly deliberately like Simon does.
chavet
13-12-2009
How much of a role are the mentors really allowed to play? It seems that their ability to pick suitable material for their acts corresponds to how far the producers would like them to progress (almost as if they didn't really have much say in it at all) e.g. Louis's suddenly inspired taste when choosing songs and ideas for John and Edward, or Rhydian or Diana. There were some clues as well when Dannii talked about a rota system relating to the pre-selected songs from which they had to choose, given that she'd been solely blamed for giving Rachel Every Heartbeat.


Stacey went home because they put her on first - it wasn't guaranteed but it made it much more likely. That's always how it's worked and Simon knew it when he did it to his own act last year.
Since Yesterday
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by broadshoulder:
“Can you provide a solid example where he has on TV actually said this? Or are you just smearing him with misyogny because the show hasnt gone the way you want it too?”

Why does it need to have been said on TV?

"I'd love to find a great male singer this year. The girls have kind of dominated it and it's time for the boys to fight back." (Source).
Unigal07
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by smashbox:
“If that's the case then how did Leona and Alexandria win? No. I think people are making excuses for Dannii as per usual. She is a nice person but she is not a great mentor. She had the strongest category this year and should have done so much better. I don't understand why so many excuses are made for her on here whilst the other judges are ripped to pieces.”

Because Leona was heads and shoulders above everyone else in her series, and Alexandra sang with Beyonce, who won it for her. Alexandra had topped the vote just once, I'm sure JLS were in the lead until Alexandra sang with Beyonce.

You cannot deny that girls have a hard time generally on the X Factor. They're always the first act out - solo or in a band. And rarely win unless they're somone very special or sing with someone very special. If Leon Jackson was a girl, he would NEVER have won. Neither would Steve Brookstein.
Unigal07
13-12-2009
Oh and I actually thought that Dannii worked some magic with Stacey. Who would have thought that the dizzy girl from Dagenham, who is admittedly no Leona Lewis, would get to the final? I didn't. I thought it would be Joe and 2 of the Overs in the final.

Some of the song choices for Stacey have been amazing. Some of Lucie's were too. The week Lucie went home, Lucie actually said that it was the first song she felt was "her" and felt totally comfortable singing. Unfortunately the public didn't know it and out she went.

Rachel got hardly any airtime during auditions so people didn't know her. When Dannii gave her "Proud Mary" she stayed.

So quick to blame Dannii but none of this is thought of. I think she's done really well considering Simon has been out to get rid of the girls from day 1. Why do you think he didn't put Treyc through when she outperformed all the blokes at Judge's Houses?

He wants a guy to win.
marianner
13-12-2009
For the 1000000 time, Dannii is not the stylist
Gotham
13-12-2009
Yes, that's the mistake Dannii made this series with Stacey, but she couldn't have done any more last night for Stacey. The songs were perfect, she was an absolute power house in all of them and schooled the other two with ease. A ****ing disgraceful result, with the voting public once again showing that they don't give a **** about talent.
friendlyguy2
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Since Yesterday:
“Because the song was poor and not familiar to much of the audience (although in all honesty she had a few problems during her performance, which is odd because it's hardly difficult to sing). Simon was questioning her performances and saying that her songs weren't age-relevant, etc. But the two previous themes were rock and big band, both of which she did well with. In fact I don't think you'll find many people who didn't rate My Funny Valentine as one of, if not the best performance during Big Band week. The fact is that Lucie had been doing just fine, until Simon stuck his oar in. Remember that he liked both her performance and the song that week, despite the fact that she'd been far better for the two previous shows. Still, Lucie evidently likes the song too, given that she's been performing it in her PAs since leaving the show.

As for Rachel, the public simply never took to her. The fact that she had very little coverage prior to the live shows can't have helped, but both Proud Mary and One were excellent performances and great song choices. The fact that she was eliminated after what I'd imagine most would agree was one of the best performances that week (Lucie was her only real competition for me) is beyond Dannii's control.

I think there's plenty of evidence to the contrary. He changed Jamie's song the night before the show twice, and he did the same thing to Danyl at least once. He gave Danyl And I Am Telling You I'm Not Going and I Didn't Know My Own Strength - the latter being an unreleased song that nobody knew. Danyl expressed concern that he was being given 'girls' songs' every week himself, and he also had issues with Simon's solo standing ovations (he got all excited because Danyl climbed a bloody ladder one week). I think it's widely regarded here that Simon's reaction to Danyl's performances played a significant part in his apparent unpopularity.

A Fool In Love, Betwitched (neither very well-known at all) and Come Together (quite probably the most unsuitable song in the show's entire history) were all poor song choices (kudos to Olly for pulling off A Fool In Love and Bewitched, though). Fastlove was another very poor choice, and that was the week Olly found himself in the bottom two.

Neither Lloyd nor Rikki were ever even close to being "potential finalists". Lloyd was the weakest solo act by an absolute mile this year, hence the fact that he found himself in the bottom two twice and then eliminated with the lowest number of votes. I actually had a soft spot for Rikki, but in truth he was better in previous years and wasn't great from his audition onwards. He didn't deserve to be eliminated quite so early for me, but he was never going to make the final in a million years. His unpopularity here seems to have been reflected with the wider audience, and even the press took issue with the crying / 'unusual' eyebrow.

He may have been supportive, particularly when the studio audience and some of the other judges were at their most vociferous. But the real credit there (if such a term can be considered relevant) belongs to the backing vocalists and Brian Friedman.

Largely due to support from primary school kids, and people who took up the 'vote for the worst' cause of ruining the show.

Olly's personality and charisma got Olly to the final.

The boys were hardly weaker than the groups, and the fact that the most consistent act made the final isn't at all relative to the weakness of his peers.

No she didn't. It quite evidently wasn't going to work for Rachel, no matter how well she performed. I thought she was fantastic for weeks three and four, but the votes simply weren't there despite good song choices. I don't see what else Dannii could've done, other than employ a team of people to block vote. She intervened and revamped Rachel's image as early as she could. The initial makeovers aren't down to the mentors, and that's pretty obvious from the rather generic look (which was even more apparent last year). But Rachel had the Rihanna thing going on before the live shows even started. What was Dannii supposed to do, overrule the backstage team and plonk a wig on her head from the outset?

If anyone "scuppered Lucie's chances", it was Simon. That was the sort of song he thought she should've been singing, and he's on record saying that meetings were called because he didn't approve of various things, such as song choices. Whether Dannii's her mentor or not, it's Simon's show. And if he starts giving her grief about it then there's little that she can do. Even without those meetings, he was giving Lucie a hard time on the live shows. And whether we like it or not, a huge number of people believe every last word he ever says.

That point is really quite absurd. There are no comparisons whatsoever between Stacey and Leona beyond gender, whether real or implied. Cowell is the absolute master of tosh, but even for him that entire quote is simply ludicrous.

I think Dannii's song choices more than measure up to the other mentors'. Take a look back through Simon's choices from this year's shows, for example.

That quite simply was never going to happen. Joe was always going to be in the final this year, regardless of how good the girls may have been.

Rachel Hylton "never stood a chance" because she wasn't at all popular. Both her past actions and poor attitude counted against her, and in reality she lacked versatility. We all know that Daniel was poor. But James and Louise were never going to make it, and Daniel already had a fanbase (or sob story, if you prefer) that Suzie didn't.

So hang on - she's at fault because she didn't achieve the impossible by getting all three girls into the final. But she's also at fault for mentoring a shy, naive lad into the most popular act throughout the series and then to victory in the final on top?

Because it was regarded as a weak category. She took all of them much further than most predicted.

Keeping all three acts from what was perceived as XF5's weakest category, until Louis and Simon were down to one act each and Cheryl was down to two, was a massive achievement.

Being "hyped" is not necessarily a mark of popularity, or quality. Of course she was "a contender". Why on earth do you think Virgin/EMI signed her?

What a daft thing to do during Rock week, huh? Or are you classing This Is Me as 'rock'? And how were one or two performances ever going to carry her for another month?

That's the most novel use of the term "charisma" I think I've ever seen.

We know Simon's opinion already, but what's yours? Her hair has/had nothing to do with Dannii, nor does she get to pick which guest artists appear on the show.

I don't see any "mystery". Complacency earns you nothing.”

Leon only won the X Factor because he didn't have the bombastic attitude of Rhydian and wasn't a teeny pop singer like Same Difference. Danni nearly blew his chances in weeks 1 of 2007 with the wrong clothes and song and almost ruined his chances later on with the Long and Winding Road. Leon had a huge fanbases north of the border and no doubt among the grannies and the girls south of the border. What happened when his album came out? I rest my case Cowell dumped him. He won the X Factor despite Danni not because of her and as for Rhydian she was the only judge who voted 'no' for Rhydian in his first audition.

As for my opinion this year Joe has been consistent every week singing songs that he's comfortable with. Lloyd was the contestant who Cheryl took risks with. Olly did a great vocal in week 1 but since then it's been cheesy dancing and dancers and backing singers but according to Simon Cowell it's only Stacey who does cabaret acts?

Danni blew it the chance of winning for Stacey was there for the taking and she blew it. Even if she'd said Stacey had the X Factor but no Danni couldn't say it not even last night. If she doesn't get to pick which artists appear with her act well that confirms my point. Stacey was stitched up by Cowell why? He didn't want a female winning this year competing with Leona and Alexandra.

To sit there and praise all 3 acts just like Cheryl and Simon did while Louis took his neutral hat off and backed Olly as having the X Factor showed Danni up I'm afraid. I don't agree on what she did with her other 2 acts. Rachel's image was changed too late and Lucie should have been left as she was. Danni just doesn't like being controversial and is too in awe of Cheryl. With a different mentor who genuinely believed in her vocal range and her performing abilities on stage Stacey could have won this year.
Unigal07
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Since Yesterday:
“Because the song was poor and not familiar to much of the audience (although in all honesty she had a few problems during her performance, which is odd because it's hardly difficult to sing). Simon was questioning her performances and saying that her songs weren't age-relevant, etc. But the two previous themes were rock and big band, both of which she did well with. In fact I don't think you'll find many people who didn't rate My Funny Valentine as one of, if not the best performance during Big Band week. The fact is that Lucie had been doing just fine, until Simon stuck his oar in. Remember that he liked both her performance and the song that week, despite the fact that she'd been far better for the two previous shows. Still, Lucie evidently likes the song too, given that she's been performing it in her PAs since leaving the show.

As for Rachel, the public simply never took to her. The fact that she had very little coverage prior to the live shows can't have helped, but both Proud Mary and One were excellent performances and great song choices. The fact that she was eliminated after what I'd imagine most would agree was one of the best performances that week (Lucie was her only real competition for me) is beyond Dannii's control.

I think there's plenty of evidence to the contrary. He changed Jamie's song the night before the show twice, and he did the same thing to Danyl at least once. He gave Danyl And I Am Telling You I'm Not Going and I Didn't Know My Own Strength - the latter being an unreleased song that nobody knew. Danyl expressed concern that he was being given 'girls' songs' every week himself, and he also had issues with Simon's solo standing ovations (he got all excited because Danyl climbed a bloody ladder one week). I think it's widely regarded here that Simon's reaction to Danyl's performances played a significant part in his apparent unpopularity.

A Fool In Love, Betwitched (neither very well-known at all) and Come Together (quite probably the most unsuitable song in the show's entire history) were all poor song choices (kudos to Olly for pulling off A Fool In Love and Bewitched, though). Fastlove was another very poor choice, and that was the week Olly found himself in the bottom two.

Neither Lloyd nor Rikki were ever even close to being "potential finalists". Lloyd was the weakest solo act by an absolute mile this year, hence the fact that he found himself in the bottom two twice and then eliminated with the lowest number of votes. I actually had a soft spot for Rikki, but in truth he was better in previous years and wasn't great from his audition onwards. He didn't deserve to be eliminated quite so early for me, but he was never going to make the final in a million years. His unpopularity here seems to have been reflected with the wider audience, and even the press took issue with the crying / 'unusual' eyebrow.

He may have been supportive, particularly when the studio audience and some of the other judges were at their most vociferous. But the real credit there (if such a term can be considered relevant) belongs to the backing vocalists and Brian Friedman.

Largely due to support from primary school kids, and people who took up the 'vote for the worst' cause of ruining the show.

Olly's personality and charisma got Olly to the final.

The boys were hardly weaker than the groups, and the fact that the most consistent act made the final isn't at all relative to the weakness of his peers.

No she didn't. It quite evidently wasn't going to work for Rachel, no matter how well she performed. I thought she was fantastic for weeks three and four, but the votes simply weren't there despite good song choices. I don't see what else Dannii could've done, other than employ a team of people to block vote. She intervened and revamped Rachel's image as early as she could. The initial makeovers aren't down to the mentors, and that's pretty obvious from the rather generic look (which was even more apparent last year). But Rachel had the Rihanna thing going on before the live shows even started. What was Dannii supposed to do, overrule the backstage team and plonk a wig on her head from the outset?

If anyone "scuppered Lucie's chances", it was Simon. That was the sort of song he thought she should've been singing, and he's on record saying that meetings were called because he didn't approve of various things, such as song choices. Whether Dannii's her mentor or not, it's Simon's show. And if he starts giving her grief about it then there's little that she can do. Even without those meetings, he was giving Lucie a hard time on the live shows. And whether we like it or not, a huge number of people believe every last word he ever says.

That point is really quite absurd. There are no comparisons whatsoever between Stacey and Leona beyond gender, whether real or implied. Cowell is the absolute master of tosh, but even for him that entire quote is simply ludicrous.

I think Dannii's song choices more than measure up to the other mentors'. Take a look back through Simon's choices from this year's shows, for example.

That quite simply was never going to happen. Joe was always going to be in the final this year, regardless of how good the girls may have been.

Rachel Hylton "never stood a chance" because she wasn't at all popular. Both her past actions and poor attitude counted against her, and in reality she lacked versatility. We all know that Daniel was poor. But James and Louise were never going to make it, and Daniel already had a fanbase (or sob story, if you prefer) that Suzie didn't.

So hang on - she's at fault because she didn't achieve the impossible by getting all three girls into the final. But she's also at fault for mentoring a shy, naive lad into the most popular act throughout the series and then to victory in the final on top?

Because it was regarded as a weak category. She took all of them much further than most predicted.

Keeping all three acts from what was perceived as XF5's weakest category, until Louis and Simon were down to one act each and Cheryl was down to two, was a massive achievement.

Being "hyped" is not necessarily a mark of popularity, or quality. Of course she was "a contender". Why on earth do you think Virgin/EMI signed her?

What a daft thing to do during Rock week, huh? Or are you classing This Is Me as 'rock'? And how were one or two performances ever going to carry her for another month?

That's the most novel use of the term "charisma" I think I've ever seen.

We know Simon's opinion already, but what's yours? Her hair has/had nothing to do with Dannii, nor does she get to pick which guest artists appear on the show.

I don't see any "mystery". Complacency earns you nothing.”

Bloody brilliant post!
KatrinaK
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by friendlyguy2:
“With a different mentor who genuinely believed in her vocal range and her performing abilities on stage Stacey could have won this year.”

There is no way a female would have won this year, no matter who thier mentor was.
Strictly_Irish
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by MARTYM8:
“Sorry - but she lost Lucie (her strongest singer) through Simon going to deadlock. She voted off Jedward even though she could have picked Olly and he would have gone out.

Maybe Dannii secretly wishes now she had picked Jedward in the sing off the Olly would have gone home 3 weeks ago!”

Lucie was bottom of the votes -- Rock Bottom.

Rachel was in the bottom two a ridiculous amount of times too.
ZipGypsy
13-12-2009
If this is true, then if I were Dannii, I would take good advantage of the media rumours that she's thinking of quitting. And just tell Simon where to put his job.

Go on Dannii........tell the world what Cowell's like and stick it to the man.
radio-one
13-12-2009
Stacey is alright, but she is not really a great singer, her voice is not that good either.
Rose Petals
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by gqq:
“The man chats codswallop. His reputation this series has dramatically plummeted from being someone whose opinions were right on the money 95% of the time to just coming out with distorted, irrelevant, over biased comments. His demeanour towards Dannii this series has been atrocious, always sticking like glue to Cheryl and never giving her eye contact.”

I agree. I love Simon but am quite peed off at the way he's sidelined Dannii this year, what has she done that's so bad?
Acashoonhay
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by beanbean:
“I think its the curse of that song "feeling good".
Danyl was in the bottom 2 when he sung that, and i think Adam Lambert was too. ”

Yes, they both were and there was mention of The Curse of Feeling Good as soon as it was confirmed that Stacey would be singing it.
SCUSA
13-12-2009
I like Dannii & think she is just as good as any other judge (no judge will get it exactly right every time with every contestant)...

But I do agree with a fair amount of what Simon said (or at the the point he was getting at). Although it would have been good to throw in a big ballad once or twice....

Where she could really be relevant and take advantage of a sort of uniqueness she has is with songs like The Scientist & Rule the World. If she had defined herself more down this road, she very likely may have one....

and more importantly would have been the most current winner of the shows history (as ballad sings can only be but so current, even if they are successful). A girl singing these current sounding male group type songs is definitly a good place in the market to be.
Acashoonhay
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Unigal07:
“Because Leona was heads and shoulders above everyone else in her series, and Alexandra sang with Beyonce, who won it for her. Alexandra had topped the vote just once, I'm sure JLS were in the lead until Alexandra sang with Beyonce.”

No they weren't.
Acashoonhay
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by radio-one:
“Stacey is alright, but she is not really a great singer, her voice is not that good either.”

Isn't that the same thing?


Basically, Stacey would have looked the weakest to the new viewers last night.

Her vocals weren't very good, nerves definitely got the better of her. Olly played a blinder with his first performance and was good enough on the other two and Joe, well, Joe was just Joe, head and shoulders above the others vocally as he has been from the start.
jojo2008
13-12-2009
Simon is obsessed with Leona isn't he?
He always has to compare at least one act with her every year :yawn:
Sulty
13-12-2009
That is so hypocritical of SIMON!!! She never did a big song, she sang The scientist, At last, A disney song, That REALLY slow rock song and Son of a preachers man
NONE of those songs needed Huge vocals to make
It wasn't until Simon said "Stacey that was the best performance of the night" when she sang Who wants to live forever , is when dannii started giving Stacey big songs
MARTYM8
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Strictly_Irish:
“Lucie was bottom of the votes -- Rock Bottom.
”

So we believe was Olly 3 weeks ago - and he may still win tonight. Given another chance Lucie might well have made the final 5 or better.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map