• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Should BBC presenters be allowed on SCD?
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
Philly1234
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“I'm sorry you cannot get away that easily. Obviously, the braineating zombies are slightly disadvantaged compared to the limb throwing kind (imagine the lifts and acrobatic movements they could all do). Also, because they are zombies, they won't display any emotions. Looking at the forums today, this gives them the unfair advantage that they won't display inappropriate emotions.”

It's not like the zombie would know when their limbs might fly off...are you ageist when it comes to zombies? They're not different types of zombies. They all eat brains, and after awhile their limbs might come off. Please, have some sympathy for the poor things.
kay_bee
13-12-2009
I've got an idea. How about only having pro dancers, no celebs. Only have qualified judges who mark using real criteria. No public vote so it's not a popularity contest but a dance competition.

Hmm. Just need to think of a name for this...Coming Dancing?.... Really Strict Dancing?
lach doch mal
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Philly1234:
“It's not like the zombie would know when their limbs might fly off...are you ageist when it comes to zombies? They're not different types of zombies. They all eat brains, and after awhile their limbs might come off. Please, have some sympathy for the poor things.”

Come on off it! Zombies not knowing when their limbs fly off, it's like imagining that people have facial true facial expressions rather than faked ones. Zombies know very well how to use these limbs to their absolute advantage, it's a fact!! I don't have sympathy with them, they signed up for the show, so they should behave exactly in the way that i want them to behave.
claire2281
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“Come on off it! Zombies not knowing when their limbs fly off, it's like imagining that people have facial true facial expressions rather than faked ones. Zombies know very well how to use these limbs to their absolute advantage, it's a fact!! I don't have sympathy with them, they signed up for the show, so they should behave exactly in the way that i want them to behave.”

Sorry, but zombies already get way too much press. Have you seen the amount of films they've been in the last few years? It wouldn't be fair - what if one of the zombies was a popular one from Shaun of the Dead?
lach doch mal
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by claire2281:
“Sorry, but zombies already get way too much press. Have you seen the amount of films they've been in the last few years? It wouldn't be fair - what if one of the zombies was a popular one from Shaun of the Dead?”

Well maybe we need to get zombies with a similar popularity level on the show. As long as none of the zombies are BBC presenters, we should be fine.
isopap
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by clayton_st:
“Surely if a regular BBC presenter is entered in SCD he/she have an advantage in as much that they are presnted to the public as Mr/Mrs nice guy every time they are on.
Also (In Chris's case) the other morning presenters were always backing him and urging support for him.
Since SCD has now become a popularity contest and not a dance skill contest any presenter entering should not be allowed screen time ( as politicians are not allowed to have jobs in the media during election time).
If it was judged on ability it wouldn't matter but since the GBP vote on whether or not they like a contestant I think a screen ban during contest would be appropriate.”

Firstly, SCD has always combined dancing and popularity within the context.

Secondly, suggesting that a light entertainment show contestants should abide by the same rules as those who stand in election to get the opportunity to run the country LMAO
isopap
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“... and don't forget authors' books are actually read by many people which gives them such an unfair advantage. Depending on the book they might be perceived to be nice people.

Maybe we should only allow people that work in tv but behind the scenes (e.g. the makeup artists in Strictly).”

Sorry but they've already had far too much coverage on ITT this year for their entry into the competition to be viewed as fair
isopap
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by claire2281:
“Sorry, but zombies already get way too much press. Have you seen the amount of films they've been in the last few years? It wouldn't be fair - what if one of the zombies was a popular one from Shaun of the Dead?”

Indeed, and given that this film appears in nearly every list show going in the run up to christmas they would definitely be receiving more media-wide coverage than the other zombies.

P.S. Having clicked the link with a sigh in my heart this is actually turning out to be the best thread in weeks
claire2281
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by isopap:
“Indeed, and given that this film appears in nearly every list show going in the run up to christmas they would definitely be receiving more media-wide coverage than the other zombies.”

And they'd have Simon Pegg supporting them. Can't have someone with media backing like that. we'd have to select our zombies very carefully...

Quote:
“P.S. Having clicked the link with a sigh in my heart this is actually turning out to be the best thread in weeks ”

Well if people will ask silly questions they should get silly responses...
Philly1234
13-12-2009
My god you people are stupid! Zombies don't know anything! They are innocent! Please stop the zombie bashing! It's the producers and the editing! They're ruining everything!
lach doch mal
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by isopap:
“Indeed, and given that this film appears in nearly every list show going in the run up to christmas they would definitely be receiving more media-wide coverage than the other zombies.

P.S. Having clicked the link with a sigh in my heart this is actually turning out to be the best thread in weeks ”

By the way, I feel the same way. A bit of lighthearted fun, something we need desperately on here.

And can I just say I really don't mind zombies at all..... as long as they do not give me their silly sob stories
Vivacious Lady
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“I'm sorry you cannot get away that easily. Obviously, the braineating zombies are slightly disadvantaged compared to the limb throwing kind (imagine the lifts and acrobatic movements they could all do). Also, because they are zombies, they won't display any emotions. Looking at the forums today, this gives them the unfair advantage that they won't display inappropriate emotions.”

I favour robots. Why spoil the show by including humans or ex-humans who might always display inappropriate emotions and facial expressions. A robot can display a consistent facial expression throughout their rumbas and tangos. We should of course exclude any pigeon toed ones, or ones with splayed hands in case they upset Craig.
isopap
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by claire2281:
“And they'd have Simon Pegg supporting them. Can't have someone with media backing like that. we'd have to select our zombies very carefully...



Well if people will ask silly questions they should get silly responses... ”

He has over 100,000 followers on twitter, we'd have to get a court order or something to stop him mentioning SCD on it.

Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“By the way, I feel the same way. A bit of lighthearted fun, something we need desperately on here.

And can I just say I really don't mind zombies at all..... as long as they do not give me their silly sob stories”

But you just know they're going to bang on about being dead all the time Like that's meant to make us feel sorry for them and vote
isopap
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Vivacious Lady:
“I favour robots. Why spoil the show by including humans or ex-humans who might always display inappropriate emotions and facial expressions. A robot can display a consistent facial expression throughout their rumbas and tangos. We should of course exclude any pigeon toed ones, or ones with splayed hands in case they upset Craig.”

Not to mention any that have previously built up a following on Robot Wars
lach doch mal
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by isopap:
“Not mentioning any that have previously built up a following on Robot Wars ”

I think we should not let any Dr Who robots take part either. Although the daleks would be perfect (similar looks, no emotions), I'm sure they have lots of followers, which would be so unfair.

In response to Philly

"My god you people are stupid! Zombies don't know anything! They are innocent! Please stop the zombie bashing! It's the producers and the editing! They're ruining everything!"

Sorry you are obviously very gullible and you are so easily taking in by all this exposure that zombies had on TV. I suggest we take your right to vote away. You cannot be trusted to make the right decision.
Vivacious Lady
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“I think we should not let any Dr Who robots take part either. Although the daleks would be perfect (similar looks, no emotions), I'm sure they have lots of followers, which would be so unfair.”

The daleks would also leave Len with nothing to do. Everyone knows that it is Len's job to look at the footwork. So I agree with you, no daleks.

This is getting complicated.
lach doch mal
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Vivacious Lady:
“The daleks would also leave Len with nothing to do. Everyone knows that it is Len's job to look at the footwork. So I agree with you, no daleks.

This is getting complicated. ”

What about Cyberman then? Although, they still have human brains, so some of them could display human emotions. And to be fair, the way the gurn all the time is very offputting. Back to the drawing board (or the zombies).
hansue
13-12-2009
Loving these humorous posts. However, I have a better idea why don't they have a programme of people who can't help starting stupid threads like this one. You know the people I mean, the ones that their favourite has been knocked out and they are trying to get the rules changed to suit them.
Agent Krycek
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“What about Cyberman then? Although, they still have human brains, so some of them could display human emotions. And to be fair, the way the gurn all the time is very offputting. Back to the drawing board (or the zombies).”


With Cybermen you just know Bruno would moan about the stomping, and they never point their feet - nope, sorry, zombies it is
Helenaka
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by clayton_st:
“Surely if a regular BBC presenter is entered in SCD he/she have an advantage in as much that they are presnted to the public as Mr/Mrs nice guy every time they are on.
Also (In Chris's case) the other morning presenters were always backing him and urging support for him.
Since SCD has now become a popularity contest and not a dance skill contest any presenter entering should not be allowed screen time ( as politicians are not allowed to have jobs in the media during election time).
If it was judged on ability it wouldn't matter but since the GBP vote on whether or not they like a contestant I think a screen ban during contest would be appropriate.”

Errm, You do realise that other BBC presenters have been on before Chris? Off the top of my head, Spangles won, the BBC breakfast news guy (whose name I should know as I watch it all the time) was pants and Gethin Jones did reasonably well.

I watch the BBC breakfast news every day, whilst they are supportive of Chris, there was always an element that they couldn't believe how well he was doing and it is only in the last couple of weeks they have started to think that he could actually win the show. They were not urging for support at all.

That said, I have watched other SCD contestants being interviewed on there regularly and their interviewers have always been impartial and positive in their discussions.

I just get the impression that they are pleased for their work colleague and there is nothing wrong with that.

Don't you think that you are taking SCD a bit too seriously? After all, it is only a TV show?
lach doch mal
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Agent Krycek:
“With Cybermen you just know Bruno would moan about the stomping, and they never point their feet - nope, sorry, zombies it is”

Did you put a bet on the zombies? What is so special about them? Surely they cannot be technically better than the robots (they know how to dance those things). Don't tell me it's all about entertainment with you
Philly1234
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by isopap:
“He has over 100,000 followers on twitter, we'd have to get a court order or something to stop him mentioning SCD on it.



But you just know they're going to bang on about being dead all the time Like that's meant to make us feel sorry for them and vote ”

Ok that one caught me offguard.
dogsdinner
13-12-2009
I want to see yeti on SCD - especially after a wax.
Vivacious Lady
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by dogsdinner:
“I want to see yeti on SCD - especially after a wax.”

Aren't yetis rather tall? In which case, how is Vincent to manage? Sorry, but I think yetis would disadvantage the shorter dancers. (And they do have rather big feet, which must be a disadvantage.)
isopap
13-12-2009
Originally Posted by Vivacious Lady:
“Aren't yetis rather tall? In which case, how is Vincent to manage? Sorry, but I think yetis would disadvantage the shorter dancers. (And they do have rather big feet, which must be a disadvantage.)”

Yeti's are clearly too tall to manage a Jive, I'm not going another series without a decent Jive
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map