Originally Posted by Ambassador:
“When it comes to that bastion of middle class dullness, tennis, the BBC's public service remit is thrown out of the window. Who needs regional news or politics when you can watch two posh blokes hit a ball, thats real PSB
Having it on BBC2 would deliver an equal audience, there's no valid reason for the BBC to yet again put RATINGS ahead of it's PSB remit”
Originally Posted by Ambassador:
“No it's not. It's a tennis match, tennis is a fairly minority sport.”
Has it ever occurred that there might be other people in this great and diverse nation of ours who don't share your working class chip-on-shoulder view of things?
The fact that tomorrow will confirm that several million people tuned in to some or all of this match will show how wrong you are.
Originally Posted by Ambassador:
“BBC2 cannot offer regional output for those areas without the analogiue signal”
What regional shows have been shunted to BBC2, out of interest?
Perhaps one also has to ask why the powers that be decreed that the BBC would only be able to offer regional opt-outs across England on BBC1 on digital, whereas analogue didn't have that restriction. I suspect this wasn't the BBC's doing.
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Morning fellow number crunchers. Not a great result for the BBC but the tense third set should have provided a decent enough peak at least. However the next 35 minutes will probably see the audience tapering off considerably.”
I suppose the average may have been higher across 3h40m than over 5h if Murray had taken it the full distance.
I would think the peak will be very decent around 11.15-11.30am. Didn't the rained-off F1 early in 2009 get something like 6m casual viewers around 11am, and that was only paddock talk?