Originally Posted by iain:
“but because the sales are largely driven by the objective of stopping TXF from getting to number one, a lot of people would be buying it whatever it was.”
“but because the sales are largely driven by the objective of stopping TXF from getting to number one, a lot of people would be buying it whatever it was.”
And conversely the sales of the X Factor single are largely driven by it being the X Factor single, regardless of the artist and regardless of the song being performed. A lot of people would be buying that whatever it was. Your point being?
The fact is, in order to topple the X Factor dominance, which is the principal factor in this campaign, people have to get behind the same horse in the race. Everyone pulling in a different direction achieves nothing.
Would I prefer a different song on a different label? Yes. But its the point being made ultimately, and none of this distortion about them being on Cowell's label (they aren't) and Killing In The Name profiting Cowell (it isn't) will stop people making their point.
This isn't about Joe, as we all know he'll ultimately be as successful as Steve Brookstein, Shayne Ward and Leon Jackson. This campaign began whilst the winner was being picked, and trying to say its because its Joe is weasely. Personally I'd have much preferred it to be Olly Murs, because I actually don't dislike Joe, whereas Olly isn't a particularly charismatic person.




