• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Amy Pond - Do we know why she's dressed as a tarty policwoman??
<<
<
2 of 6
>>
>
stcoop
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by JCR:
“He's holding hands with her a lot. I also heard he was wearing an 'I love Amy' tee shirt, but I've not seen proof of that one yet.”

Not quite. If you look at the photos from Croatia he's wearing a shirt with a photo of himself and Amy in a Love Heart in them.
JCR
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by stcoop:
“Not quite. If you look at the photos from Croatia he's wearing a shirt with a photo of himself and Amy in a Love Heart in them.”

That was it!
crazzyaz7
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by allen_who:
“Yeah you're right on reflection. The worlds changing and we've all got to deal with it... Good little debate that though vaughan6477 ... easy”

I'm so glad you said that....because your first post on the so called agenda (as really there isn't one) topic was bordering on offensive.....

Any Homosexual content in an RTD story is always done in a way that makes you not bat an eye lid, and makes of the norm....that someone just happens to be gay, just as someone happens to be hetrosexual....I mean, the relationship that was built between Rose and the Doctor....no one complained that RTD has a Hetrosexual agenda....yet he makes one female character say the word "she" instead of "he" and you got people in a forum up in arms about the fact that RTD has a gay agenda....forgetting that in tha very episode, you have a hetrosexual couple, that are more in your face than the supposed lesbian relationship that Sky may have (yes I am talking about Midnight)

I find it so weird that when someone is hetrosexual, it doesn't matter if it has anything to do with the story or not....but yet a someone being Gay can only be Gay if its something to do with a plot????? Otherwise its some agenda because the writer also happens to be gay???? What the???? What RTD does with gay references, soaps and other dramas can only dram of....they make them into huge issues...and the next they are all forgotten about...I remember the time when I used to watch Eastenders...and the pathetic Lesbian story they started with whats her name again....sonia thats it....when soon its all forgotton and never mentioned...if its not sensational, or a huge plot line...you just don't get gay characters....while in Doctor Who, thanks to RTD, a person can be gay, and have nothing to do with the plot, not sensationalism made of it....just a character thing....just like a gay person would go out and about in most of their lives, working or whatever, being gay wouldn't come into it....they are just gay....just like someone is just hetrosexual....
allen_who
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by crazzyaz7:
“I'm so glad you said that....because your first post on the so called agenda (as really there isn't one) topic was bordering on offensive.....

Any Homosexual content in an RTD story is always done in a way that makes you not bat an eye lid, and makes of the norm....that someone just happens to be gay, just as someone happens to be hetrosexual....I mean, the relationship that was built between Rose and the Doctor....no one complained that RTD has a Hetrosexual agenda....yet he makes one female character say the word "she" instead of "he" and you got people in a forum up in arms about the fact that RTD has a gay agenda....forgetting that in tha very episode, you have a hetrosexual couple, that are more in your face than the supposed lesbian relationship that Sky may have (yes I am talking about Midnight)

I find it so weird that when someone is hetrosexual, it doesn't matter if it has anything to do with the story or not....but yet a someone being Gay can only be Gay if its something to do with a plot????? Otherwise its some agenda because the writer also happens to be gay???? What the???? What RTD does with gay references, soaps and other dramas can only dram of....they make them into huge issues...and the next they are all forgotten about...I remember the time when I used to watch Eastenders...and the pathetic Lesbian story they started with whats her name again....sonia thats it....when soon its all forgotton and never mentioned...if its not sensational, or a huge plot line...you just don't get gay characters....while in Doctor Who, thanks to RTD, a person can be gay, and have nothing to do with the plot, not sensationalism made of it....just a character thing....just like a gay person would go out and about in most of their lives, working or whatever, being gay wouldn't come into it....they are just gay....just like someone is just hetrosexual....”

No it wasn't bordering on offensive. Grow up. It was simply a remark about whether I felt it was appropriate for 'who' or not, and I've come down on the side it doesn't matter. What's with the siege mentality amongst the gay community at all???
crazzyaz7
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by allen_who:
“No it wasn't bordering on offensive. Grow up. It was simply a remark about whether I felt it was appropriate for 'who' or not, and I've come down on the side it doesn't matter. What's with the siege mentality amongst the gay community at all???”

It was offensive because you were suggesting that we are all Moff knows that we are all getting fed up of the gay references...and that you hope that he won't do that, and considering that Moff is hetrosexual, You easily seem to ignore the obvious gay references in the Empty Child where Jack slaps the soldier's bottom, and the fact that the Doctor practically suggest that Jack would want to dance with him too...oh and that you felt the innocent, and friendly kiss on the lips made you voilently sick...but no mention of the fact the very RT-Gay agenda-Davies had the Doctor snogging Rose's face off....whether that was appropriate or not....

Plus I wasn't attacking you...I was just merely remarking what I felt by your first post on the topic...and just talking in general about how I feel the gay references are in Who, and how some people in the past have reacted to them...

Oh and I aint gay.... So thanks for suggesting that gay people seem to have a certian mentality....it just proved my point
allen_who
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by crazzyaz7:
“It was offensive because you were suggesting that we are all Moff knows that we are all getting fed up of the gay references...and that you hope that he won't do that, and considering that Moff is hetrosexual, You easily seem to ignore the obvious gay references in the Empty Child where Jack slaps the soldier's bottom, and the fact that the Doctor practically suggest that Jack would want to dance with him too...oh and that you felt the innocent, and friendly kiss on the lips made you voilently sick...but no mention of the fact the very RT-Gay agenda-Davies had the Doctor snogging Rose's face off....whether that was appropriate or not....

Plus I wasn't attacking you...I was just merely remarking what I felt by your first post on the topic...and just talking in general about how I feel the gay references are in Who, and how some people in the past have reacted to them...

Oh and I aint gay.... So thanks for suggesting that gay people seem to have a certian mentality....it just proved my point”

We've done all these points already... I refer you back ten posts ago. I aint repeating myself - apart from to say it aint offensive and to add that you are way way way too deep
crazzyaz7
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by allen_who:
“We've done all these points already... I refer you back ten posts ago. I aint repeating myself - apart from to say it aint offensive and to add that you are way way way too deep”

Hence why I started with my first post as saying, "i'm so glad you said that..."...I was just making a point of what I felt, just like you decided to bring the subject of the gay agenda in a thread that was about Amy looking Tarty....I was glad that you felt times were moving on...and just like you earlier made your opinions heard of why you feel its inappropraite, I was just having a say on the matter as well...again, most of my post was general, after all you hadn't mentioned Midnight had you? I was just referring back to last year when some forum members were shouting "gay agenda" just because of one little word "she"....and just expressing how annoyed I get at this behaviour....just like you were expressing how you feel Jack kissing the Doctor is innappropraite to "Who", and if I was feeling a little offended by something you said...well then I was feeling offended....can't help what I feel, just like you can't help feeling voilently sick at Jack kissing the Doctor.

And yes I am deep....that is very lovely thing for you to say...thankyou
codename_47
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by allen_who:
“We've done all these points already... I refer you back ten posts ago. I aint repeating myself - apart from to say it aint offensive and to add that you are way way way too deep”

You can't tell people how they feel and how quickly they should develop (the grow up comment) then make accusations that she must be gay because she called you out on your closed minded views...

You went from boderline offensive, to backing down, to over the line offensive in your responses to Crazzy...

Moffat is on record saying nothing will change, (non-existant) "Agenda" wise, and that it amuses him that people are looking to him to change things because he has written the gayest joke in Dr Who history ("Does he still have that RUBBISH Beard? ) so anyone thinking he is going to be a barometor of straightness is sorely mistaken.

Bottom line, RTD and Moffat paint an optimistic future where humanity has gotten over prejudice and homophobia, and that irks a certain minority of the fans who wish it was all hidden away behind closed doors so they can go on making tasteless jokes...

Now can we PLEASE get over this "agenda" rubbish.
Analysethis
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by allen_who:
“ I still feel violently ill at the thought of CE's Doctor getting kissed by Barrowman in Parting of the Ways... I aint homophobic by-the-way”

By the preceeding childish comment, you're either homophobic or 8 years old - you pick which. You see the kiss between Jack and the Doctor as unacceptable, but not the one moments before between Jack and Rose.
[LIST][*]You're disgusted by two men kissing, but not a man and a woman.[*]You're being intolerant of a display of homosexuality but not of heterosexuality, not based on any other factors than sexuality.[*]Ergo, homophobe.[/LIST]Get your head out the sand, if you're going to be intolerant you have no right whatsoever to think of yourself as a good person.
crazzyaz7
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by codename_47:
“You can't tell people how they feel and how quickly they should develop (the grow up comment) then make accusations that she must be gay because she called you out on your closed minded views...

You went from boderline offensive, to backing down, to over the line offensive in your responses to Crazzy...

Moffat is on record saying nothing will change, (non-existant) "Agenda" wise, and that it amuses him that people are looking to him to change things because he has written the gayest joke in Dr Who history ("Does he still have that RUBBISH Beard? ) so anyone thinking he is going to be a barometor of straightness is sorely mistaken.

Bottom line, RTD and Moffat paint an optimistic future where humanity has gotten over prejudice and homophobia, and that irks a certain minority of the fans who wish it was all hidden away behind closed doors so they can go on making tasteless jokes...

Now can we PLEASE get over this "agenda" rubbish. ”



Sometimes I really do worry that their optimistic future may just be a fantasy....and that really makes me sad
Check_it
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by allen_who:
“I still feel violently ill at the thought of CE's Doctor getting kissed by Barrowman in Parting of the Ways...”

I'd go to your GP about that if I were you
jimbo_bob
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by alienpanda:
“Any Idea?

Im guessing she's not an actual policewoman??

I did think strippogram but surely thats not fitting for a family show...

so, any ideas??

Maybe shes on her way to a fancy dress party when the doc meets her for the first time, and mistakes her for an actual policewoman?”


Anyway, back on track.....

I'm not sure WHY she's wearing that rather nice outfit, but I am REALLY glad she is...
Cel1084
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by jimbo_bob:
“Anyway, back on track.....

I'm not sure WHY she's wearing that rather nice outfit, but I am REALLY glad she is...”

Doesn't look like she has a gun on the belt or a badge , got what looks like pepper spray and handcuffs though. I wonder why?
Maidenfan666
18-12-2009
why? WHY?

Weirdest question ever - who cares, we get Karen Gillian in numerous short skirts, apaprently, and a sexy policewomens outfit showing off her beautiful long legs, im just thankful for that - reasoning be damned.
andychurchill
18-12-2009
Amy is a real policewoman but is off duty and has dressed up for Rory's "hen" night. Rory is her gay best friend, and they "love" each other in a "best friends" capacity. Rory fancies the doctor, Amy doesn't, Amy prefers older men. The Doctor doesn't fancy anyone anymore, coz he's got his heart set on someone else since she showed up unexpectedly in the last series.

I think that covers it.
SpringheelJack
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by andychurchill:
“Amy is a real policewoman but is off duty and has dressed up for Rory's "hen" night. Rory is her gay best friend, and they "love" each other in a "best friends" capacity. Rory fancies the doctor, Amy doesn't, Amy prefers older men. The Doctor doesn't fancy anyone anymore, coz he's got his heart set on someone else since she showed up unexpectedly in the last series.

I think that covers it. ”

The only thing you missed was the "PHWOOOOARRRR!

PHHHHWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAR!

PHHHHHHWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAR!

Know what I mean, squire?"

</Nudge Nudge Wink Wink>

Gets coat.
Maidenfan666
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by andychurchill:
“Amy is a real policewoman but is off duty and has dressed up for Rory's "hen" night. Rory is her gay best friend, and they "love" each other in a "best friends" capacity. Rory fancies the doctor, Amy doesn't, Amy prefers older men. The Doctor doesn't fancy anyone anymore, coz he's got his heart set on someone else since she showed up unexpectedly in the last series.

I think that covers it. ”


I actually think that sounds like quite a good wee set up, will be interesting having roary on board as well
allen_who
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by Check_it:
“I'd go to your GP about that if I were you”

I did do but he was being violently ill as well

Think all of the above posts having a stab at me are from users who need to get a job in Gorden Browns Government ... worrying about absolutely nothing when the entire world is turning to sh*te...

If RTD hasn't got a gay agenda with that show then I'm Saddam Hussain... All I'm saying is I accept it, it don't matter cos they are just fleeting references... If it's really all about equality then where are the Disabled people, Paraplegics and Down Syndromes?... Where are the Indians? How often doe the Chineese get a look in? Every now and again when they give Chippo Chang a ten minute token spell... Jim Royle... Equality my Arse :yawn: :yawn: :sleep:
andychurchill
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by SpringheelJack:
“The only thing you missed was the "PHWOOOOARRRR!

PHHHHWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAR!

PHHHHHHWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAR!

Know what I mean, squire?"

</Nudge Nudge Wink Wink>

Gets coat.”

Is that what Rory is saying to Amy while leering at the dashing young Doctor?
Hot Dogg
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by SpringheelJack:
“The only thing you missed was the "PHWOOOOARRRR!

PHHHHWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAR!

PHHHHHHWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAR!

Know what I mean, squire?"

</Nudge Nudge Wink Wink>

Gets coat.”


Say no more!

.... What's it like?
JAS84
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by galentine:
“Anyway, back to the policewoman outfit. I like the idea of the hen night because there is no way a real policewoman could uphold authority in a skirt that short!”

True. If she really is a cop, her skirt should be longer (or replaced with trousers) and her hair should be tied up in a bun or something, not worn loose. I agree with the notion that she's in fancy dress and the Doctor just thinks she's a policewoman. If she really is a cop, I'll be annoyed with SM for not doing the research.
SpringheelJack
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by Hot Dogg:
“Say no more!

.... What's it like? ”

ROTFLOL!
SpringheelJack
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by JAS84:
“If she really is a cop, I'll be annoyed with SM for not doing the research.”

I'm not.
Cel1084
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by Maidenfan666:
“why? WHY?

Weirdest question ever - who cares, we get Karen Gillian in numerous short skirts, apaprently, and a sexy policewomens outfit showing off her beautiful long legs, im just thankful for that - reasoning be damned.”

So you don't care why she has on a Very short skirt and caries Handcuffs
NewbieCanuck
18-12-2009
Originally Posted by BaileyBigIdiot:
“How do you know he might be her best friend, just because that he joins the Doctor and Amy doesnt mean that Amy and Rory have to be in a relationship.”

It would serve a lot of people right if "Rory" is Amy's gay best friend and he goes onto the TARDIS because he and the Doctor fall in love.
<<
<
2 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map